EFL Students’ Attitudes to Oral Corrective Feedback in Two Different Contexts: Spain Versus Algeria
Abstract
Background: Although oral corrective feedback (OCF) has been shown to benefit second language acquisition, relatively few studies have examined students’ attitudes toward it, which may impact on its effectiveness. Moreover, even though students’ attitudes to language learning can depend on different variables, such as students’ level or cultural background, very few studies have looked at the possible impact of such variables on students’ attitudes to OCF. Even fewer studies have focused on affective responses to OCF and hardly any have included non-WEIRD populations.
Method: To fill these gaps, the present study compared students’ attitudes to OCF, as well as their affective responses to OCF, in two contrasting EFL higher-education settings with different L2 teaching traditions, by means of a cross-sectional Likert-type questionnaire: 213 Spanish and 261 Algerian EFL students at the university level. Descriptive statistics in the form of percentages of agreement and disagreement were calculated, and chi-square tests of independence were carried out to investigate possible differences in attitudes.
Results: Contrary to previous findings that cultural background only appears to have a minor effect on students’ attitudes to OCF, we found significant differences between Spanish and Algerian students’ attitudes for several aspects of OCF, such as frequency, error type, OCF-type and affective responses to OCF. For instance, although most students expressed a wish to receive as much OCF as possible, there were more Algerian students who preferred to be corrected only in certain cases. With regard to OCF types, the majority of students in both contexts expressed a preference for metalinguistic feedback, but Algerian students were more positive about recasts.
Conclusion: Given these observed differences, we cannot expect students from all contexts to have similar beliefs about OCF. Teachers are thus advised to discuss OCF with their students in order to avoid mismatches between students’ beliefs and teachers’ practices, as this can negatively affect the learning process. This study sheds light on the beliefs about OCF of students from different backgrounds, including an underrepresented, non-Western population, i.e., Algerian EFL students. It also highlights a need to further explore the possible reasons behind the observed differences in attitudes.
Downloads
References
Andringa, S., & Godfroid, A. (2020). Sampling bias and the problem of generalizability in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190520000033
Akiyama, Y. (2017). Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: A longitudinal investigation. System, 64, 58–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.007
Alzahrani, H.F. (2016). Teachers stated beliefs on coded unfocused corrective feedback in EFL writing at a Saudi university. TESOL International Journal, 11(1), 52–61.
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all?: Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060268
Arroyo, D. C., & Yilmaz, Y. (2018). An open for replication study: The role of feedback timing in synchronous computer‐mediated communication. Language Learning, 68(4), 942-972. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12300
Benmoussat, S., & Benmoussat, N. D. (2018). ELT in Algeria: The hegemony of the teach-to-the-test approach. English Language and Literature Studies, 8(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v8n2p63
Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814563200
Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (Vol. 1, pp. 66–84). Routledge.
Carson, J. G. & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.
Cathcart, R. L., & Olsen, J. E. W. B. (1976). Teachers’ and students’ preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors. In J. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’76 (pp. 41–53). TESOL.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Chengchen Li (2020) Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World [Chinese外语界], 196(1), 34-49.
Dewaele, J. & Meftah, R. (2023). The trajectory of English foreign learners’ emotions and motivation from the start to the end of their learning journey: A pseudo-longitudinal investigation. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 7(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.22599/ jesla.94
Fu, M., & Li, S. (2022). The effects of immediate and delayed corrective feedback on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 2-34. https://doi:10.1017/S0272263120000388
García Bermejo, M. L. (2021). Foreign language education in Spain: A historical view. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2020-0021
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Garrett, P., Coupland, N., & Williams, A. (2003). Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and performance. University of Wales Press.
German, E., & Mahmud, Y.S. (2021). Students’ perception and preference on corrective feedback in online writing classes. TESOL International Journal, 16(8), 54–71.
Ghounane, N. (2020). Moodle or social networks: What alternative refuge is appropriate to Algerian EFL students to learn during Covid-19 pandemic. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 21-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.2
Ghounane, N., & Rabahi, H. (2023). Moodle in the Algerian EFL context during COVID-19: Exploring students’ attitudes and academic achievements. Arab World English Journal. Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces, 17-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/comm1.2
Ha, X. V., Murray, J.C., & Riazi, A.M. (2021). High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 235–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.4
Ha, X.V., & Nguyen, L.T. (2021). Targets and sources of oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: Are students’ and teachers’ beliefs aligned? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697160
Hamidi, D., Babajani Azizi, D., & Kazemian, M. (2022). The effect of direct oral corrective feedback on motivation to speak and speaking accuracy of Iranian EFL learners. Education and Self-development Journal, 17(3), 50-63. http://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.3.05
Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588240
Havranek, G., & Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1(August 2001), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.1.10hav
Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying students’ beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 110–129). Prentice Hall International.
Hu, G. (2019). Culture and peer feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and Issues (2nd ed., pp.45-63). Cambridge University Press.
Hu, X., & Gong, W. (2025). Mapping the emotional landscape of SLA: A two-decade bibliometric exploration (2000–2024). SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251375379
Irfani, B., & O’Boyle, A. (2024). Teacher practices and student preferences of oral corrective feedback in Indonesian EFL classrooms: A Vygotskian perspective. Training, Language and Culture, 8(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-1-101-114
Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2011). Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring? Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01143.x
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). Cultural orientation and academic language use. In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, & M. Byran (Eds.), Language and culture (pp. 84–97). BAAL and Multilingual Matters.
Kadri, N., & Amziane, H. (2021). Students’ attitudes about self-assessment: A neglected aspect in the Algerian EFL classrooms. The Educational Review, 5(8), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2021.08.004
Kaivanpanah, S., Alavi, S. M., & Sepehrinia, S. (2015). Preferences for interactional feedback: Differences between learners and teachers. Language Learning Journal, 43(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.705571
Kartchava, E. (2016). Learners’ beliefs about corrective feedback in the language classroom: Perspectives from two international contexts. TESL Canada Journal, 33(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v33i2.1235
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). Learners’ beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.101
Kartchava, E., Gatbonton, E., & Ammar, A. (2020). Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 24(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818787546
Kim, J.-H., & Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 269–297). Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (2009). Principles and practice in second language acquisition (Internet edition). http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000020
Levshina, N. (2015). How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. John Benjamins.
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 84, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.307
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004010
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). John Benjamins.
Mahalingappa, L., Polat, N., & Wang, R. (2022). A cross-cultural comparison in pedagogical beliefs about oral corrective feedback: the case of English language teachers in China versus the US. Language Awareness, 31(4), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1900211
McCargar, D. F. (1993). Teacher and student role expectations: Cross-cultural differences and implications. The Modern Language Journal, 77(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01963.x
Nelson, G. L., & Murphey, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 135-142.
Nouioua, R. (2019). Attitudes to learner autonomy and learning strategies in Algerian EFL context. Journal of Human Sciences, 29(3), 97-126.
Pawlak, M. (2011). Cultural differences in perceptions of form-focused instruction: The case of advanced Polish and Italian learners. In J. Arabski & A. Wojtaszek (Eds.), Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 77–94). Springer.
Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00001
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
Psaltou-Joycey, A. (2008). Cross-cultural differences in the use of learning strategies by students of Greek as a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29(4), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630802147817
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2015). Exploring non-native English-speaking teachers’ cognitions about corrective feedback in teaching English oral communication. System, 55, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.09.006
Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.002
Rassaei, E. (2013). Corrective feedback, learners’ perceptions, and second language development. System, 41(2), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.837912
Roothooft, H. (2014). The relationship between adult EFL teachers’ oral feedback practices and their beliefs. System, 46, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.012
Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 25(4), 318–335.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1235580
Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitude. In M. J. Rosenberg, C. I. Hovland, W. J. McGuire, R. P. Abelson, & J. W. Brehm (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 1-14). Yale University Press.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012a). Investigating the pedagogical potential of recasts for L2 vowel acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.25
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012b). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /r/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x
Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA‐Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301–322). Oxford University Press.
Slimani, S. (2016). Teaching English as a foreign language in Algeria. Revue des Sciences Humaines – Université Mohamed Khider Biskra, 44, 33-44.
Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437
Van De Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bimmel, P. (2015). Learning new grammatical structures in task-based language learning: The effects of recasts and prompts. Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12211
Wach, A., & Monroy, F. (2020). Beliefs about L1 use in teaching English: A comparative study of Polish and Spanish teacher-trainees. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 855–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819830422
Wiboolyasarin W., Tiranant P., Khumsat T., Ngamnikorn T., Wiboolyasarin K., Korbuakaew S., & Jinowat N. (2023). Preferences for oral corrective feedback: Are language proficiency, first language, foreign language classroom anxiety, and enjoyment involved? Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.1614
Yang, J. (2016). Learners’ oral corrective feedback preferences in relation to their cultural background, proficiency level and types of error. System, 61, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.004
Yang, N. D. (1992). Second language learners’ beliefs about language learning and their use of learning strategies: A study of college students of English in Taiwan [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas.
Yakisik, B. Y. (2021). EFL learners’ preferences and emotions about oral corrective feedback at secondary education in Turkey: Are there gender and grade-level differences? Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 103-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.889
Yilmaz, Y. (2012). The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62(4), 1134–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.x
Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.2167/la429.0
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05378.x
Zhu, Y., & Wang, B. (2019). Investigating English language learners’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback at Chinese universities: A large-scale survey. Language Awareness, 22(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1620755
Copyright (c) 2025 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
