Conceptual Metaphors to Foster Students’ Vocabulary Learning Outcomes in English for Business Purposes
Abstract
Background: Metaphors are found to have positive impacts on vocabulary teaching and learning. However, further investigations into the existing literature disclosed a lack of thorough research regarding the utilization of conceptual metaphors in teaching business vocabulary. In addition, while these studies have shed light on the impact of orientational metaphors in teaching vocabulary, there remains a lack of consensus concerning the effects of teaching vocabulary through structural metaphors or ontological metaphors.
Purpose: To examine the effectiveness of utilizing the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) in teaching English vocabulary for business purposes to enhance students' vocabulary learning outcomes, including vocabulary acquisition, retention, and lexical inference.
Method: A quasi-experimental study was designed and conducted over a duration of 10 weeks with the participation of 58 second-year students specializing in International Business. The participants were randomly and equitably allocated to the experimental group, which utilized the CMT-based teaching method, and the Control group, which employed traditional teaching methods. The data were collected via a pre-test, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test, thereafter, analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 26.0.
Results: While the pre-test scores exhibited their homogeneity in their English proficiency before the experiment, the students in the experimental group achieve a mean score of 7.662; 1.228; and 7.429, surpassing the control group's mean score of 6.710; 0.510; and 6.476 regarding the results gained in the overall Immediate post-test, Inference questions, and Delayed post-test respectively.
Conclusion: CMT-based teaching approach significantly enhances students’ vocabulary learning outcomes, including vocabulary acquisition, lexical inference, and vocabulary retention. The current study contributes to the literature relating to vocabulary instructional approach. The study indicates that instructors can facilitate business vocabulary learning by explicitly emphasizing the conceptual frameworks that support key lexical elements. Furthermore, the findings suggest that future classroom applications may be improved by integrating metaphor education into case studies, presentations, and real-world business situations, enabling students to utilize metaphors in contextually relevant manners. These pedagogical insights can assist educators in designing more cognitively engaging evidence-based practice programs that promote long-term vocabulary growth.
Downloads
References
Al-Khasawneh, F. (2019). The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge on the Reading Comprehension of Saudi EFL Learners. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8822
Al-Otaibi, G.M. (2019). A cognitive approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs: Rudzka-Ostyn’s Model. Journal of Language and Education, 5(2), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8170
Alnan, A., & Halim, H. A. (2024). Examining vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size among Syrian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70356
Alnujaidi, S. (2025). Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches. Journal of Language and Education, 11(2), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.18364
Akramy, S. A., Noori, A. Q., Orfan, S. N., & Hashemi, A. (2022). Effective techniques of teaching vocabulary in Afghan EFL classrooms. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00151-8
Apriliyani, M. V., & Prasetyarini, A. (2021). Strategies in teaching vocabulary to the fifth grade students of SD Negeri 3 Sobokerto in 2021 academic year [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Bennett, P. (2022). Metaphorical vocabulary in English as a medium of instruction courses. In P. Ferguson & R. Derrah (Eds.), Reflections and new perspectives. JALT. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTPCP2021-31
Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.553
Boers, F. (2004). Expanding learners' vocabulary through metaphor awareness: What Expansion, what learners, what vocabulary? In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 211-232). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.211
Borys, D. (2023). Conceptual Metaphor in English Slang Phytonyms. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 20(2). 79-98.
Çelik, B. (2021). The importance of using metaphors in foreign language teaching and learning. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(2), 55-65. ttps://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v1i2.17
Chung, E., Fung, D., & Wan, A. (2025). A mixed-methods study of strategy use in academic vocabulary learning among first-year undergraduates in Hong Kong. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 74, 101482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101482
Chung, E., & Newton, J. (2025). Metaphors as windows into academic vocabulary learning. TESOL Quarterly, 59(2), 1036-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3375
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Ed.). Sage.
Dabbagh, A., & Janebi Enayat, M. (2017). The role of vocabulary breadth and depth in predicting second language descriptive writing performance. The Language Learning Journal, 47(5), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1335765
Gocić, M. P. S., Vujnović, S. N., & Stevović, J. R. R. (2023). Role of metacognition in EAP vocabulary development: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(3), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP230612047S
Enayat, M. J., Ghadim, N. A., & Arabmofrad, A. (2025). Effects of two mobile-assisted language learning apps on L2 receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A mixed-methods study. System, 133, 103763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103763
Han, L. (2025). Effects of single-player and multi-player role-playing game genres on developing incidental vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2479135
Hanh, N. T. T. (2024a). Conceptual metaphor BUSINESS IS A JOURNEY in business terminology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(11), 3463-3470. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.15
Hanh, N. T. T. (2024b). Military affair and building as source domains in nominating strategic management terminology. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 21(2), 161-180.
Hanh, N. T. T. (in press). Ontological Metaphors in English Business Economics Terminology and their Equivalence in Vietnamese. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2025(25), Article 3383. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.3383
Hua, H. (2020). A Study of english vocabulary learning in China - From the perspective of conceptual metaphor theory. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 427-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1103.11
Huong, N. T., & Chi, N. H. L. (2023). Students’ views on Quizlet as a learning medium to enhance legal English vocabulary acquisition. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 39(3), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5079
Janebi Enayat, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Vocabulary size and depth as predictors of second language speaking ability. System, 99, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102521
Jiang, S., & Zhao, H. (2025). Learning english vocabulary via Instagram or YouTube: Surveying the impacts on motivation, growth mindfulness, willingness to communicate, and enjoyment from the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Motivation, 89, 102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102089
Kalay, D., & Keçik, İ. (2023). Metaphorical insights: Phrasal verb knowledge gain in the light of conceptual metaphor theory. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 7(3), 82-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v7i3.5070
Karahan, P. (2015). The effect of conceptual metaphors on Turkish EFL learners’ comprehension and production of phrasal verbs. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 3(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijlc.v3n1a10
Kheovichai, B. (2015). Metaphor in business English. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 15(1), 93-130. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hasss/article/view/33288
Kirkpatrick, A. (2017). The languages of higher education in East and Southeast Asia: Will EMI lead to Englishisation? In B. Fenton-Smith, P. Humphreys, & I. Walkinshaw
(Eds.), English-medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy. (pp. 21-36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51976-0_2
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kovecses, Z., & Szabco, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.3.326
Kweldju, S. (2005). Lexically-based language teaching: metaphor for enhancing learning. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 52-65. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/110274/lexically-based-language-teaching-metaphor-in-english-for-specific-purposes
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lee, J. H., Ahn, J. J., & Lee, H. (2022). The role of motivation and vocabulary learning strategies in l2 vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 435-458. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.3.5
Li, R. (2021). Does game-based vocabulary learning APP influence Chinese EFL learners’ vocabulary achievement, motivation, and self-confidence? Sage Open, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211003092
Liu, F., Lu, X., & Jin, T. (2025). Using ChatGPT to facilitate vocabulary learning in continuation writing assessment tasks. Assessing Writing, 65, 100952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100952
Lu, Z., & Sun, J. (2017). Presenting English polysemous phrasal verbs with two metaphor-based cognitivemethods to Chinese EFL learners. System, 69, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.016
Mariappan, L. (2025). Examining the influence of outdoor experiential learning on ESL vocabulary retention. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2516871. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2516871
Masrai, A., Milton, J., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., & Elmenshawy, H. (2021). Measuring the contribution of specialist vocabulary knowledge to academic achievement: Disentangling effects of multiple types of word knowledge. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-021-00114-5
Medina, E. G. L., & Hurtado, C. P. R. (2017). Kahoot! A digital tool for learning vocabulary in a language classroom. Revista Publicando, 4(12), 441-449. Retrieved from https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/673
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nguyen, H. V., Vu, T. D., Saleem, M., & Yaseen, A. (2024). The influence of service quality on student satisfaction and student loyalty in Vietnam: the moderating role of the university image. Journal of Trade Science, 12(1), 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-12-2023-0032
Nhu, N., & Huyen, P. (2009). Conceptual metaphor and its application in teaching phrasal verbs to English majors at Thuc Hanh High School, HCMC. HCMC University of Education, 13-26.
Rasti-Behbahani, A. (2021). Why digital games can be advantageous in vocabulary learning. Theory and practice in language studies, 11(2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1102.01
Schmitt, N. (2007). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Shadish W. R., Cook T., Campbell D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Shahiwala, S., & Rahul, D. R. (2025). Protocol for Bayesian meta-analysis on digital game-enhanced vocabulary learning. Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/29984475.2025.2490568
Shi, W. (2025). The application of systematic analytical thinking in teaching vocabulary for English majors. Acta Psychologica, 257, 105091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105091
Smirnova, O., Rackevičienė, S., & Mockienė, L. (2021). Frame semantics methodology for teaching terminology of specialised domains. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(4), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104765S
Tri, D. H., & Moskovsky, C. (2019). English-medium instruction in Vietnamese higher education: A road-mapping perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1319-1336. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.721977441692400
Wei, M., & Macaro, E. (2024). Vocabulary learning in EMI courses: A longitudinal study of Chinese university students over a term. System, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103479
White, B. J. (2012). A conceptual approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs. The Modern Language Journal, 96(3), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01365.x
Wu, Y. P., Abd Halim, H., & Hamzah, M. H. (2024). Assessing the roles of L1 and meaning knowledge in processing and production of English collocations among Chinese EFL learners. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 30(1), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3001-13
Zafirovska, A., & Xhaferi, B. (2022). Vocabulary acquisition in English for medicine – Students’ perspective. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(3), 505-532. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2203505Z
Zarrati, Z., Zohrabi, M., Abedini, H., & Xodabande, I. (2024). Learning academic vocabulary with digital flashcards: Comparing the outcomes from computers and smartphones. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100900
Copyright (c) 2025 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
