Formative Feedback, Writing Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Writing Competence Among EFL University Students in Kosovo: An Associative Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background. Research on EFL writing has widely examined formative feedback and writing self-efficacy, but fewer studies have integrated feedback quality, task-specific writing self-efficacy, and perceived writing competence within a single empirical model. The unresolved problem is whether students’ confidence in performing academic writing tasks functions as an intermediary mechanism through which feedback perceptions are associated with competence self-evaluations, particularly in underrepresented higher education contexts where formative assessment practices are still developing.
Purpose. This study clarifies whether writing self-efficacy operates as a linking construct between formative feedback and perceived writing competence among EFL university students in Kosovo. In doing so, it aims to extend social-cognitive explanations of academic writing by showing how an instructional condition may be connected to students’ self-evaluative judgments through writing-related capability beliefs.
Method. Self-report data were collected from 400 students enrolled in English-medium academic writing courses at four higher education institutions in Kosovo. The measurement model was examined through confirmatory factor analysis, and the hypothesized relationships were tested through observed-variable path analysis. Because the study was cross-sectional and based on self-report data, all findings are interpreted as associative rather than causal.
Results. The hypothesized pattern was supported. Formative feedback was positively associated with writing self-efficacy (β = 0.39) and perceived writing competence (β = 0.30), while writing self-efficacy was positively associated with perceived writing competence (β = 0.37). The indirect association through writing self-efficacy was significant (β = 0.15), indicating partial statistical mediation. Substantively, students who perceived feedback as clearer and more usable also tended to report stronger writing confidence, which in turn was linked to more positive competence evaluations.
Conclusion. The study contributes by testing an integrated model of feedback, self-efficacy, and perceived writing competence in an underrepresented Balkan EFL higher education context. It positions writing self-efficacy as an intermediary construct that helps explain why formative feedback is associated with students’ competence self-evaluations. The findings support the broader applicability of Social Cognitive Theory to EFL writing while also highlighting the need for cross-cultural research that compares how feedback traditions and student engagement shape this model across educational systems.
Downloads
References
Balan, A., & Jönsson, A. (2018). Increased explicitness of assessment criteria: Effects on student motivation and performance. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 81. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00081
Baleghizadeh, S., & Masoun, A. (2014). The effect of self-assessment on EFL learners’ self-efficacy. TESL Canada Journal, 31(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i1.1166
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00092
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903267784
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., Gai, X., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalization of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 788474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474
Gustafson, S., Nordström, T., Andersson, U. B., Fälth, L., & Martin, I. (2019). Effects of a formative assessment system on early reading development. Education, 140(1), 17–27.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hwang, S. (2025). Unpacking the impact of writing feedback perception on self-regulated writing ability: The role of writing self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), Article 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020100
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Komljanc, N., & Marsh, C. J. (2008). Cross-national comparisons of the use of formative assessment in Hong Kong and Slovenia. Curriculum Perspectives, 28(2), 17–23.
Lampert, J. N. (2007). The relationship of self-efficacy and self-concept to academic performance in a college sample [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Pacific University.
Lee, I. (2009). Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal, 63(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn010
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
Pajares, F. (2007). Empirical properties of a scale to assess writing self-efficacy in school contexts. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 39(4), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2007.11909801
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), Self perception (pp. 239–265). Ablex.
Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students’ writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593
Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158–170). Guilford Press.
Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte20076485
Peltzer, K., Lira Lorca, A., Krause, U.-M., Graham, S., Panadero, E., & Busse, V. (2025). How to support at-risk writers: Differential effects of formative feedback on argumentative writing and motivation. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10652-w
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 34–54). Routledge.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2007). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13–27). Oxford University Press.
Siekmann, L., Parr, J. M., van Ophuysen, S., & Busse, V. (2023). Text quality and changing perceptions of teacher feedback and affective-motivational variables: A study with secondary EFL students. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1171914. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1171914
Simon, B. (2019). The effect of formative assessment on student motivation and self-regulation [Master’s thesis]. Concordia University.
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning. Prentice Hall.
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339
Tılfarlıoğlu, F. Y., & Cinkara, E. (2009). Self-efficacy in EFL: Differences among proficiency groups and relationship with success. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 3(2), 129–142.
Tsao, J.-J. (2021). Effects of EFL learners’ L2 writing self-efficacy on engagement with written corrective feedback. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00591-9
Vattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024). Students’ experiences of peer feedback practices as related to awareness raising of learning goals, self-monitoring, self-efficacy, anxiety, and enjoyment in teaching EFL and mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(5), 904–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2192772
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845
Copyright (c) 2026 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
