Guided Inquiry with Educational Videos: Supporting Retention and Invested Cognitive Effort in EFL Higher Education
Abstract
Background. While videos increasingly support flexible and student-centred learning in higher education, their pedagogical potential is often limited in practice. Transient information effects and insufficient emphasis on generative processing constrain active cognitive engagement. Empirical evidence evaluating how specific pedagogical frameworks, such as the 5E guided inquiry model, impact cognitive load dimensions in EFL higher education remains limited.
Purpose. To investigate how guided inquiry can foster generative processing in video-based learning and help address the transient information effect in terms of learning outcomes and cognitive load.
Method. A pre/post-test quasi-experiment was conducted with 135 English department students, divided into a control group (n=65) and a treatment group (n=70). The participants were first-year EFL students who were novices in the subject domain and reported varied English proficiency, most commonly intermediate or upper-intermediate. Both groups studied the same content across eight sessions. The control group used educational videos and direct instruction, while the treatment group used educational videos combined with the 5E model of guided inquiry. Cognitive load was measured across essential, extraneous, and generative processing, while pre- and post-tests assessed retention and transfer.
Results. Findings demonstrate that the treatment group achieved significantly higher retention (p < .001, r = .414). Due to a ceiling effect, transfer outcomes were deemed uninterpretable rather than evidence of comparability. While the aggregate cognitive-load subscales did not show between-group significance, results demonstrated a localised effect on invested cognitive effort, with one item remaining significant after Holm-Bonferroni correction (p < .001, r = .326). Within this context, the findings suggest that the initial increase in extraneous processing was not sustained over time and appeared to diminish as students adapted to the guided inquiry structure.
Conclusion. This study applies multi-dimensional cognitive load measurements to a 5E guided inquiry intervention within an EFL higher education context. The results indicate that the original hypothesis was supported for retention and partially supported, at the item level, for invested cognitive effort. These findings offer a context-bound perspective for curriculum designers, suggesting that structured inquiry prompts can support foundational knowledge consolidation and specific facets of engagement in comparable EFL multimedia learning environments.
Downloads
References
Alruwaili, R. F. (2025). Scroll immersion and short-form video use: Predictors of attention, memory, and fatigue among Saudi social media users. Acta Psychologica, 260, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105674
Anderson, J. A. E., Campbell, K. L., Amer, T., Grady, C. L., & Hasher, L. (2014). Timing is everything: Age differences in the cognitive control network are modulated by time of day. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037243
Ayres, P., Lee, J. Y., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2021). The Validity of Physiological Measures to Identify Differences in Intrinsic Cognitive Load. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702538
Azevedo, R., & Dever, D. (2021). Metacognition in Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 132–142). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.013
Baker, K., Jessup, N. A., Jacobs, V. R., Empson, S. B., & Case, J. (2020). Productive struggle in action. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12 MTLT, 113(5), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtlt.2019.0060
Beege, M., & Ploetzner, R. (2025). Learning from interactive video: the influence of self-explanations, navigation, and cognitive load. Instructional Science, 53, 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09693-5
Behrendt, M. G., Clark, C., Elliott, M., & Dauer, J. (2024). Relation of life sciences students’ metacognitive monitoring to neural activity during biology error detection. npj Science of Learning, 9, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00231-z
Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
Brod, G. (2020). Generative Learning: Which strategies for what age? Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1295–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9
Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. NSTA Press.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., Wong, M., & Paas, F. (2018). Learning symbols from permanent and transient visual presentations: Don’t overplay the hand. Computers & Education, 116, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.011
Chi, S., Wang, Z., & Liu, X. (2021). Moderating effects of teacher feedback on the associations among inquiry-based science practices and students’ science-related attitudes and beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 43(14), 2426–2456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1968532
Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 5–11.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
de Jong, T. (2021). The guided inquiry principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 394–402). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.041
de Jong, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2014). The guided discovery learning principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 371–390). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139547369.019
de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Fiorella, L. (2021). Multimedia Learning with Instructional Video. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 487–497). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.050
Fiorella, L. (2023). Making sense of generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 185–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.019
Hassoun, A., Beacock, I., Consolvo, S., Goldberg, B., Kelley, P. G., & Russell, D. M. (2023). Practicing information sensibility: How gen Z engages with online information. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581328
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Jaeger, A., Martins, T. H. P. G., Rodrigues, J. P. P., Muniz, B. F. B., Fonseca, A. L. S. da S., & Gonçalves, A. de O. (2025). The benefits of elaborative encoding over retrieval practice for associative learning. Memory & Cognition, 53, 1592–1607. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01671-z
Jiang, D., & Sweller, J. (2021). The transient information principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 268–274). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.027
Kaldaras, L., Wang, K. D., Nardo, J. E., Price, A., Perkins, K., Wieman, C., & Salehi, S. (2024). Employing technology-enhanced feedback and scaffolding to support the development of deep science understanding using computer simulations. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00490-7
Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017). Development and Validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Ginns, P., Krell, M., & Schneider, S. (2022). A Systematic Meta-Analysis Of The Reliability And Validity Of Subjective Cognitive Load Questionnaires In Experimental Multimedia Learning Research. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 2485–2541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09683-4
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023). Development and validation of a theory-based questionnaire to measure different types of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Mayer, R. E. (2021a). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 57–72). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.008
Mayer, R. E. (2021b). The Multimedia Principle. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 145–157). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.015
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2021a). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 3–16). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2021b). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 243–260). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.025
Ouzzine, A., Erguig, R., & Boudlal, A. (2022). Discovery-based teaching methodology: A framework for quality teaching and learning. Journal of Applied Language and Culture Studies, 5, 9–27.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2021). Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 73–81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.009
Paas, F., Ayres, P., & Pachman, M. (2008). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning: Theory, methods and applications. In D. H. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent Innovations in Educational Technology That Facilitate Student Learning (pp. 11–35). Information Age Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-942-220251003
Pannatier, M., & Bétrancourt, M. (2024). Learning from academic video with subtitles: When foreign language proficiency matters. Learning and Instruction, 90, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101863
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S., Kamp, E., Manoli, C., Zacharia, Z., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pellas, N. (2025). The impact of AI-generated instructional videos on problem-based learning in science teacher education. Education Sciences, 15(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010102
Pires, F., Masanet, M.-J., Tomasena, J. M., & Scolari, C. A. (2022). Learning with YouTube: Beyond formal and informal through new actors, strategies and affordances. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 28(3), 838–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211020545
Ritzhaupt, A. D., Pastore, R., & Davis, R. (2015). Effects of captions and time-compressed video on learner performance and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.020
Ruf, A., Zahn, C., Roos, A.-L., & Opwis, K. (2023). How do enhanced videos support generative learning and conceptual understanding in individuals and groups?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 2243–2269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10275-4
Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z
Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2021). The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5
Skulmowski, A. (2022). Guidelines for choosing cognitive load measures in perceptually rich environments. Mind, Brain, and Education, 17, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12342
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A Reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263426
Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2018). Investigating gender and spatial measurements in instructional animation research. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.017
Xu, T., Liu, Y., Jin, Y., Qu, Y., Bai, J., Zhang, W., & Zhou, Y. (2024). From recorded to AI-generated instructional videos: A comparison of learning performance and experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 1463–1487. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13530
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
