The Effects of Asynchronous Cross-cultural Communication on EFL University Students’ Writing Performance and Motivation
Abstract
Background: Researchers have integrated cross-cultural communication (CCC) with writing to examine students’ writing performance, motivation, and perceptions in EFL classrooms. However, the exploration of how authentic CCC with students from different cultural backgrounds benefits lower-proficiency students’ English writing competence and motivation remains underexplored.
Purpose: This mixed-methods study, employing pre-test and post-test designs, examined the effects of asynchronous CCC on EFL university lower-proficiency students’ writing performance, motivation, and perceptions to determine whether asynchronous CCC facilitated EFL lower-proficiency students’ writing competence and motivation and to elucidate its impact on their writing performance.
Method: Twenty-nine freshmen, who were non-English majors, were divided into lower-proficiency (N=15) and higher-proficiency (N=14) groups. Data were collected from the writing tests and Writing Motivation Questionnaires (WMQ) completed in the pre-test and post-test. The questions in the writing tests were identical in both tests, while the WMQ comprised 33 five-point Likert-scale questions and an open-ended question aimed at exploring the students’ motivation and perceptions regarding writing in this study.
Results: The results indicate that the features of social interaction and cross-cultural engagement within asynchronous CCC significantly developed lower-proficiency students’ writing performance and mitigated their negative writing motivation. Utilising asynchronous CCC, which facilitated feedback exchange and collaborative writing with higher-proficiency peers, notably bolstered lower-proficiency students’ writing proficiency. Additionally, the integration of meaningful, intriguing, and authentic asynchronous CCC activities contributed to reducing negative writing motivations among lower-proficiency students. However, delayed responses from online peers and a sense of demotivation while collaborating with lower-proficiency peers may have contributed to the insignificant development observed among higher-proficiency students.
Conclusion: Engaging EFL university lower-proficiency students in asynchronous CCC to exchange cultural and linguistic knowledge could enhance their writing performance and reduce their negative writing motivation. This is because the features inherent in asynchronous CCC render English writing meaningful, intriguing, and authentic.
Downloads
References
Ahmetovic, E., Becirovic, S., Dubravac, V., & Brdarevic-Celjo, A. (2023). The interplay between corrective feedback, motivation and EFL achievement in middle and high school education. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.12663
Alsamadani, H. A. (2021). Developing intercultural awareness and EFL writing skills of college-level students through email interaction. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 71-85. https://www.jltl.com.tr/index.php/jltl/article/view/334/140
Angelova, M., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness and language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.907320
Azis, Y. A., & Husnawadi. (2020). Collaborative digital storytelling-based task for EFL writing instruction: Outcomes and perceptions. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(2), 562-579. https://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.2.16.562
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Challob, A. I. (2021). The effect of flipped learning on EFL students’ writing performance, autonomy, and motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3743-3769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10434-1
Chang, W. Y. (2020). Exploring solutions to decrease Taiwanese university lower achievers’ English writing difficulties via blogging. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 21(2), 114-131. https://old.callej.org/journal/21-2/Chang2020.pdf
Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2014a). Fostering foreign language learning through technology-enhanced intercultural projects. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 57-75. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44354
Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2014b). Promoting cross-cultural understanding and language use in research-oriented Internet-mediated intercultural exchange. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 262-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.937441
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/330107
Ellis, R. (1997). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky's zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549-1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.396
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
Guerrero Moya, M. E., Muñoz Ortiz, L., & Niño Díaz, A. M. (2016). Evidence of intercultural communication competence in tenth grader’s narrative texts. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 13, 111-130. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.315
Guo, W., & Bai, B. (2022). Effects of self-regulated learning strategy use on motivation in EFL writing: A comparison between high and low achievers in Hong Kong primary schools. Applied Linguistics Review, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0085
Guskova, N., & Golubovskaya, E. (2023). Enhancement of academic performance through developing cross-cultural communicative competence: A case study of students majoring in Economics. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.13989
Hartnett, M. (2016). The importance of motivation in online learning. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2
Hsu, S.-Y. S., & Beasley, R. E. (2019). The effects of international email and Skype interactions on computer-mediated communication perceptions and attitudes and intercultural competence in Taiwanese students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4209
Hughey, J. B., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Jacobs, H. L. (1983). Teaching ESL composition: Principles and techniques. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kavanagh, B. (2019). The teaching of intercultural communication with academic writing through a CLIL based approach – A case study of a Tohoku University course. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association, 1, 100-118. https://www.j-clil.com/_files/ugd/d705d2_b75ea00bc4fc413da9281de6de9f9b32.pdf
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 207-226). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203628942
Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53-72. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44155
Leki, I., & Carson, J. G. (1994). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587199
Lin, C. C., Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G. Z. (2021). English outside the academic sphere: A mobile-based context-aware comparison study on collaborative and individual learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37, 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12514
Moslehi, S. ,& Kafipour, R. (2023). Predictors of language proficiency among medical and paramedical students: Vygotskian sociocultural theory. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.16615
Özdemir, E. (2017). Promoting EFL learners’ intercultural communication effectiveness: A focus on Facebook. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 510-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1325907
Rafieyan, V., Rafieyan, A., Rafieyan, N., Rafieyan, S., Rafieyan, P., & Rafieyan, M. (2015). Effect of developing pragmatic competence through telecollaboration on improving English as foreign language learners’ writing proficiency. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(27), 121-131. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077410.pdf
Rokhmah, S. (2020). Teaching writing skills through telecollaboration. Loquen English Studies Journal, 13(1), 1-29. http://repository.uinbanten.ac.id/5220/
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2015). A pilot study: Facilitating cross-cultural understanding with project-based collaborative learning in an online environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 123-139. http://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1607
Shadiev, R., Wang, X., & Huang, Y.-M. (2021). Cross-cultural learning in virtual reality environment: Facilitating cross-cultural understanding, trait emotional intelligence, and sense of presence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2917-2936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10044-1
Shang, H. F. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 496-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0
Shang, H. F. (2019). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
Shen, B., & Bai, B. (2024). Enhancing Chinese university students’ writing performance and self-regulated learning (SRL) writing strategy use through a strategy-based intervention. System, 122, 103249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103249
Sun, L., & Asmawi, A. (2023). The effect of WeChat-based instruction on Chinese EFL undergraduates’ business English writing performance. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1613a
Tran, T. Q. & Ngo, D. X. (2024). “I know how to behave appropriately in multiple contexts”: Vietnamese L2 learners’perceptions of intercultural intelligence enhancement via Skype-mediated course. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 25(1), 2024, 168-184. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/100/367
Tseng, S. S., & Yeh, H. C. (2019). The impact of video and written feedback on student preferences of English speaking practice. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10125/44687
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wang, C. M. (2011). Instructional design for cross-cultural online collaboration: Grouping strategies and assignment design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.968
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005
Wu, Z. (2020). Tracing EFL writers’ digital literacy practices in asynchronous communication: A multiple-case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100754
Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: The use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556
Xu, Z. (2017). Developing metacultural writing competence for online intercultural communication: Implications for English language teaching. TESL-EJ, 20(4), 1-9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1137966
Yang, Y. F. (2018). New language knowledge construction through indirect feedback in web-based collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1414852
Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time!
Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 72–93. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44227
Yeşilyurt, S. (2008). A self-determination approach to teaching writing in pre-service EFL teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/537546
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
Copyright (c) 2024 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
