The Effects of Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) and Different Interaction Patterns on Vocabulary Development of EFL Learners

  • Fatemeh Shamshiri Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
  • Sajad Shafiee Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
  • Fariba Rahimi Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
Keywords: Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL), Individual-Content Interaction, Pair work, Small-group work, Vocabulary Development

Abstract

Background: Research on the integration of Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in EFL contexts has witnessed a significant advance due to the modern changes in language education and technology over the last decades. However, the effects of CALL on vocabulary development through different interaction patterns have not been investigated by researchers.

Purpose: Attempts have been made to assess the effects of CALL and Memrise software on the vocabulary development of intermediate EFL learners through the three interaction patterns: 1) pair-work interaction, 2) small-group-work interaction, and 3) individual content.

Method: A total of 100 male and female Iranian EFL learners were selected through convenience sampling and assigned into three experimental and one control groups, each consisting of 25 learners. The Oxford Quick Placement Test was taken to assure the homogeneity of the participants. Then, a multiple-choice vocabulary test was taken as a pretest. The three experimental groups learned vocabulary through Memrise desktop software with three different interaction patterns, while the control group learned the same through the conventional pattern. A reshuffled version of the pretest constitutes the subsequent posttest.

Result: The results of the comparison between all pretests and posttests indicated that there was a significant difference between the vocabulary scores of the pretest and the posttest of the experimental groups, indicating the efficiency of these treatments. It was revealed that the pair work was slightly more effective than small-group work and that these two types of intervention were more effective than individual-content interaction, where the latter was more effective than conventional instruction.

Conclusion: According to the findings, students are advised to take advantage of CALL-based facilities and participate in interactive activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, M., Wu, T., & Hu, B. (2017). A review on organic-inorganic halide perovskite photodetectors: device engineering and fundamental physics. Advanced Materials, 29(41), 1605242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9

Aist, G. (2002). Helping children learn vocabulary during computer-assisted oral reading. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 5(2), 147-163.

Albright, J. (2000). Working the teacher: A case study in the politics of pedagogy. Teaching Education, 11(2), 159-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713698972

Alhamami, M. (2014). Vocabulary learning through audios, images, and videos: Linking technologies with memory. CALL-EJ, 17(2), 87-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p76

Ariffin, A. (2021). Effects of student collaboration on ESL learners' vocabulary development. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 177-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12627

Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL.Computer assisted language learning, 15(3), 241-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.3.241.8189

Bagheri, E., Roohani, A., &Nejad, A. D. (2012). Effect of CALL-based and non-CALL based methods of teaching on L2 vocabulary Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 744-752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.744-752

Baleghizadeh, S. (2010). The effect of pair-work on a word-building task. ELT Journal, 64(4), 405-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp097

Bangs, P. & Cantos, P. (2004). What can computer assisted language learning contribute to foreign language pedagogy? International Journal of English Studies, 4(9), 221-239.

Barkley, F. E., Cross, P. K., & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844

Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R., Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., & Sokolovskaya, A. (2012). Are contextual and designed student-student interaction treatments equally effective in distance education? Distance Education, 33(3), 311-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723162

Davis, J. N. & Lyman-Hager, M. N. (2002).Computer and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals 30(1), 48-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb01317.x

Delavari Khalifehkari, G., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2022). A comparative study of effects of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) and conventional methods of instruction on Intermediate EFL learners' vocabulary learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(3), 94-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52547/ijree.7.3.94

Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of second language writing, 21(1), 40-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002

Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language teaching research, 4(3), 193-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688000040030

Emami, A., & Amirghasemi, A. (2022). The Effect of CALL on the Vocabulary Learning of Iranian pre-intermediate EFL Learners. Applied Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 70-88.

Enayati, F., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2020). The impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on improving intermediate EFL learners' vocabulary learning.International Journal of Language Education, 4(2), 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.10560

Fathi, J., Alipour, F., &Saeedian, A. (2018). Enhancing vocabulary learning and self-regulation via a mobile application: An investigation of the memrise app. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 5(1), 27-46.

Furnborough, C. (2012). Making the most of others: Autonomous interdependence in adult beginner distance language learners. Distance Education, 33(1), 99-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667962

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2014). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. Vanpatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 194-220). Routledge.

Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(1), 37-57.

Hajebi, M., Taheri, S., Fahandezh, F., &Salari, H. (2018). The role of web-based language teaching on vocabulary retention of adult pre-intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 372-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.20

Hassan, M. M., & Mirza, T. (2020). Information and communication technology (ICT) in the distance education system: An overview. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(6), 38-42.

Hill, M. (1997). The policy processes. Prentice Hall / Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Hill, P. (1997). The migrant cocoa-farmers of southern Ghana: A study in rural capitalism. LIT Verlag Münster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0773

Hu, W. (2001). Mapping the dark matter through the cosmic microwave background damping tail. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 557(2), L79. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/323253

Huong, L. P. (2006). Learning vocabulary in group work in Vietnam. RELC, 37(1), 105-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206063477

Khoshnoud, K., & Karbalaei, A. R. (2015). The effect of computer assisted language learning (CALL) program on learning vocabulary among EFL left and right hemispheric dominant learners. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(4), 761.

Ko, M. H. (2017). Learner perspectives regarding device type in technology-assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 844-863.

Ko, M. H., &Goranson, J. (2014). Technology-assisted vocabulary learning and student learning utcomes: A case study. MultimediaAssisted Language Learning, 17(1), 11-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2014.17.1.11

Kouhsarian, M., Ghoorchaei, B., Mazandarani, O., & Shomoossi, N. (2023). How motivation and collaborative learning impact vocabulary learning: The case of Iranian high school learners. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 11(2), 138-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2023.1979883.1438

Kuo, Y. C., Belland, B. R., Schroder, K. E. E., & Walker, A. E. (2014). K-12 teachers' perception of and their satisfaction with interaction type in blended learning environments. Distance Education, 35(3), 360-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955265

Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2009). Let us read together: development and evaluation of a computer-assisted reciprocal early English reading system.Computers & Education, 53, 1188-1198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.002

Laufer, B., &Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition is a second language: The effect of task-induced involvement load. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1

Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. McGraw-Hill Education.

Lenders, O. (2008). Electronic glossing - is it worth the effort? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 457-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802447933

Lewis, M. (1997). Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach. In J. Coady & Th. Hucking (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 255-270). Cambridge University Press.

Long M. H., & Porter P. A. (1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827

Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and instruction, 6(4), 359-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400759-4

Miles, S., & Kwon, C-J. (2008). Benefits of using CALL vocabulary programs to provide systematic word recycling. English.

Teaching, 63(1), 199-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.63.1.200803.199

Mirzaei, H., Shakeri, A., Rashidi, B., Jalili, A., Banikazemi, Z., & Sahebkar, A. (2017). Phytosomal curcumin: A review of pharmacokinetic, experimental and clinical studies. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 85, 102-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.098

Mirzaeian, V. R. (2020). Collaborative podcasting and its effect on English vocabulary learning and retention. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 12(25), 223-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2020.10682

Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Mourão, J., & Nordi, N. (2018). Ethnoichthyology of artisanal fishermen from the Mamanguape River estuary, Paraíba, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 29(1), 9-17.

Mousavi, S. S., & Nemati, A. (2017). The comparative study of the Iranian EFL learners vocabulary learning through two different formats: Paper & pencil vs. software. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 6(1), 113-131.

Namaziandost, Ehsan & Nasri, Mehdi. (2019). Innovative Practices in L2 Writing Materials in the EFL Classroom: Effect on Writing Enhancement and Attitude to English Course. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 9, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2019.00017.0

Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research Journal, 14(4), 397-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375364

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (vol. 10). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873

Nation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a foreign language, 27(1), 136-145.

Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v12i1.1458

Norouzi Sedeh, S., & Tabatabaei, O. (2021). The effect of teaching vocabulary via textbook versus social media on creativity level of Iranian EFL learners. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 9(Special Issue of NTLL Conference), 121-145.

Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., Nakata, Y., Parker, P., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140-150.

Pahlavanpoorfard, S., & Soori, A. (2014). The impact of using computer software on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL university students.International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(4), 23-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.23

Panitz, T. (1999). Benefits of cooperative learning in relation to student motivation. In M. Theall (Ed.), Motivation from within: Approaches for encouraging faculty and students to excel, New directions for teaching and learning. Josey-Bass Publishing.

Regina, D., & Devi, V. A. (2022). A review on Computer Assisted and Mobile Assisted Language Learning in vocabulary learning to develop retention of learners in a sustainable English Language learning environment. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 15859.

Rogers, J. (2018). Teaching/Developing vocabulary through metacognition. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0737

Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Prentice Hall Inc.

Schunk, D. H. (1999). Social-self interaction and achievement behavior. Educational psychologist, 34(4), 219-227.

Shabaneh, Y., & Farrah, M. (2019). The effect of games on vocabulary retention. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2(01), 79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v2i01.1687

Shokrpour, N., Mirshekari, Z., Moslehi, S., & Popescu, M. (2019). Learning vocabulary electronically: Does computer assisted language learning (CALL) instruction have any impacts on Iranian EFL learners? Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1702827

Soltani, S., &Mohseni, A. (2021). Developing ESP learners' vocabulary learning by contextualization of the FonF practice model in CALL context. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 10(1), 133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v10i1.18897

Storch, N. (2007) Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074600

Tabatabaei, O., & Goojani, A. H. (2012). The impact of text-messaging on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Cross-Cultural Communication, 8(2), 47.

Tabatabaei, O., & Heidari Goojani, A. (2012). The impact of text-messaging on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Cross Cultural Communication, 8(2), 47-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120802.1689

Tamjid, N. H., & Moghadam, S. S. (2012). The effect of using vocabulary teaching software on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' vocabulary acquisition. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(3), 387-394.

Thornbury, S. (2002) How to teach vocabulary. Longman.

Vasilevski, N., & Birt, J. (2020). Analyzing construction student experiences of mobile mixed reality enhanced learning in virtual and augmented reality environments. Research in Learning Technology, 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2329

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.

Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (2000). Language for thinking: A study of children solving reasoning test problems together. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aslsvort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction (pp. 179-192). Pergamon.

Wiharja, C. K., & Cahyadi, J. (2022). The Effectiveness of Vocabulary Acquisition for First-year niversity Students by using Vocabulary. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (pp. 283-287). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3568231.3568277

Zarei, A. A., & Gilani, M. S. (2013). L2 vocabulary learning through collaborative techniques. International Journa lof Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(1), 71-84.

Published
2023-12-30
How to Cite
ShamshiriF., ShafieeS., & RahimiF. (2023). The Effects of Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) and Different Interaction Patterns on Vocabulary Development of EFL Learners. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.12093