Exploring the Use of ChatGPT in EFL/ESL Writing Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review

Keywords: ChatGPT, EFL/ESL, literature review, students, teachers, writing

Abstract

Background: ChatGPT has become increasingly prevalent in higher education, particularly within EFL/ESL writing classrooms. However, the rise in plagiarism and academic dishonesty associated with its unethical use is concerning. Educational institutions must explore and design AI-use-related best practices for using generative AI technology, such as ChatGPT, more ethically in the writing classrooms.

Purpose: To systematically review previous studies to investigate how university students use ChatGPT in their EFL/ESL writing classrooms. Given the evidence of how the students used ChatGPT, this study explores existing best practices to regulate ChatGPT’s ethical and responsible use in the classes.

Materials and Methods: Thirty-two (32) articles (i.e., 17 empirical and 15 non-empirical studies) from 31 peer-reviewed international journals were selected based on specific criteria comprising article types, quality, year of publication content, and contexts of the study, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The articles were searched in May 2024, facilitated by the Publish or Perish software. Within the software, Google Scholar was deliberately chosen as the primary database. The inductive data analysis results were rigorously checked using multiple validation strategies and presented as themes to address the research goal.

Results: The analysis revealed that ChatGPT was utilized in the writing process for various academic and non-academic writing tasks, highlighting the potential bright and dark sides of ChatGPT’s use in writing. The study then identified four main categories of regulating the use of ChatGPT in EFL/ESL writing classrooms, which include institutional policies, instructional writing strategies, assessment design innovation, and ethical co-regulation practices. Drawing on the analyses and discussions of the previous studies, the researcher suggested sample writing activities with the ethical and productive use of ChatGPT, outlined pedagogy and policy implications for regulating ChatGPT in the writing classrooms, and proposed directions for future research.

Conclusion: Key patterns in how EFL/ESL learners have used ChatGPT in writing tasks and eight replicable best practices for regulating its use in classroom contexts were identified, where among these, co-creating ethical guidelines with students and emphasizing the writing process seemed to be particularly promising strategies to mitigate the unethical use of ChatGPT in EFL/ESL writing classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberth. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in academic writing: A blessing or a curse in disguise? TEFLIN Journal, 34(2), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2/337-352

Algaraady, J., & Mahyoob, M. (2023). ChatGPT’s capabilities in spotting and analyzing writing errors experienced by EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 9, 3–17. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1

Alqasham, F. H. (2023). ChatGPT in the Saudi EFL classroom: A study of learner usage patterns and possibilities in learning optimization. Migration Letters, 20(S7), 1251–1263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS7.4828

Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745

Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.858

Baskara, F. R., & Mukarto, F. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343–358. https://ijeltal.org/index.php/ijeltal/article/view/1387

Bonner, E., Lege, R., & Frazier, E. (2023). Large language model-based artificial intelligence in the language classroom: Practical ideas for teaching. Teaching English With Technology, 23(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.56297/bkam1691/wieo1749

Carlson, M., Pack, A., & Escalante, J. (2023). Utilizing OpenAI’s GPT-4 for written feedback. TESOL Journal, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.759

Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: Recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

Cheong, W., & Hong, H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1), 37–45. https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/article/view/103

Cong-Lem, N., Tran, T. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Academic integrity in the age of generative AI: Perceptions and response of Vietnamese EFL teachers. Teaching English with Technology, 24(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.56297/FSYB3031/MXNB7567

Črček, N., & Patekar, J. (2023). Writing with AI: University students’ use of ChatGPT. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.17379

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Hang, N. T. T. (2023). EFL techers’ perspectives toward the use of ChatGPT in writing classes: A case study at Van Lang University. International Journal of Language Instruction, 2(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.23231

Ho, A., & Nguyen, H. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in language learning: EFL students’ perceptions of technology acceptance. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53761/fr1rkj58

Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605

Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2024). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT for foreign language education at the university level. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269319

Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int

Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024). “AI, will you help?” How learners use artificial intelligence when writing. XLinguae, 17(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.03

Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981

Mali, Y. C. G. (2017). Promoting effort attributions to EFL students. Accents Asia, 9(1), 30–40. http://www.issues.accentsasia.org/issues/9-1/Gai_Mali.pdf#:~:text=Attribution describes an explanation that learners provide for,role to promote the effort attributions to students.

Mali, Y. C. G. (2024). EFL graduate students’ voices on their technology-integrated classroom language tasks. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning, 27(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.7375

Mali, Y. C. G. (2025). Factors hindering the integration and potential of technology in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 9(1), 171–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v9i1.9553

Mali, Y. C. G., & Salsbury, T. L. (2021). Technology integration in an Indonesian EFL writing classroom. TEFLIN Journal, 32(2), 243–266. https://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1558/354

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

McAdoo, T. (2024). How to cite ChatGPT. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt

Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050

Mohammadkarimi, E. (2023). Teachers’ reflections on academic dishonesty in EFL students’ writings in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.10

Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600–3606. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788737/

Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151

Muslem, A., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Juliana, R. (2018). Perceptions and barriers to ICT use among English teachers in Indonesia. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 3–23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1170638.pdf

Özçelik, N. P., & Ekşi, G. Y. (2024). Cultivating writing skills: The role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8

Peachey, N., & Crichton, R. (2024). AI activities and resources for English language teachers. British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2024-11/Peachey_2024_ AI_activities_resources_English_language_teachers.pdf

Poveda-Garcia-Noblejas, B., & Antropova, S. (2024). Analysis of CLIL-related research in school settings: A systematic review. Journal of Language and Education, 10(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.18150

Rababah, L. M., Rababah, M. A., & Al-Khawaldeh, N. N. (2023). Graduate students’ ChatGPT experience and perspectives during thesis writing. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48395

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Harlow.

Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2018). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Sage Publications, Inc.

Schmidt-Fajlik, R. (2023). ChatGPT as a grammar checker for Japanese English language learners: A comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(1), 105–119. https://asiacall-acoj.org/index.php/journal/article/view/29

Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843

Sulistyo, T., Eltris, K. P. N., Mafulah, S., Budianto, S., Saiful, S., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Learning outcomes and students’ attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169

Teng, M. F. (2024a). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304

Teng, M. F. (2024b). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Tikhonova, E., & Raitskaya, L. (2024). The culture of research: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Language and Education, 10(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.21526

Tseng, W., & Warschauer, M. (2023). AI-writing tools in education: If you can’t beat them, join them. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 3(2), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0008

Tseng, Y.-C., & Lin, Y.-H. (2024). Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ writing with ChatGPT: A university-level course design. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 78–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.5.3329

Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212

Yeo, M. A. (2024). ChatGPT and the future of editorial writing. RELC Journal, 55(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003368822412405

Zadorozhnyy, A., & Lai, W. Y. W. (2023). ChatGPT and L2 written communication: A game-changer or just another tool? Languages, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.3390/languages9010005

Zain, D. S. M. (2022). Flipped classroom model for EFL/ ESL instruction in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Language & Education, 8(3), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12855

Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
MaliY. C. G. (2025). Exploring the Use of ChatGPT in EFL/ESL Writing Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Language and Education, 11(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.21793