Predictors of Language Proficiency among Medical and Paramedical Students: Vygotskian Sociocultural Theory

  • Shadab Moslehi Department of English Language, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Reza Kafipour Department of English Language, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9906-7242
Keywords: cultural factors, language proficiency, linguistic factors, medical students, paramedical students, social factors

Abstract

Background: There are many factors in determining language proficiency among university students. Identifying these factors can help the teaching and learning process to move forward more quickly and effectively.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the relationship between social, cultural, and linguistic factors and the language proficiency of 221 medical and paramedical students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences to identify if these factors contribute to language proficiency as an effective variable in students’ communication, academic performance, and quality patient care.

Method: The authors administered a questionnaire on these factors' role and a proficiency test. Then, they ran Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses to determine the relationship and effects of such factors concerning language proficiency.

Results: The t-test revealed a statistically meaningful difference between medical and paramedical students concerning both mean scores of proficiency and cultural factors. The results indicated only social and cultural factors statistically correlated with paramedical students’ proficiency. Furthermore, none of these factors built any relationship or exerted any effects on the proficiency of medical students.

Conclusion: The results implied that educational policymakers should consider the existing differences between university students of different fields since they come from different sociocultural and linguistic backgrounds that have affected the academic stance in which they are studying. Moreover, the findings necessitate encouraging the policymakers and university lecturers to enhance their sociocultural competencies to adapt and fulfill the needs of such students and highlighting the roles of the family's socioeconomic positions through some workshops since the role of the family is an important variable in determining the extent to which a learner has acquired a specific cultural competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfayez, S. F, Strand, D. A., & Carline, J. D. (1990). Academic, social, and cultural factors influencing medical school grade performance. Medical Education, 24(3), 230-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.765551

Alkhudiry, R. (2022). Theory in mediating l2 knowledge co-construction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2117-2123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19

Amir Abadi, S., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2022). A qualitative study of socio-cultural and linguistic factors affecting Iranian EFL learners' language proficiency. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 1(1), 33-47.

Amirabadi, S. & Razmjoo, S. A. (2017). Social, cultural and linguistic factors affecting EFL learners' language proficiency: A Quantitative analysis.International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 5(17), 121-135.

Bagheri, M., & Andi, T. (2015). The relationship between medical student's attitude towards English language learning and their English language proficiency. ICT & Innovations in Education- International Electronic Journal, 3(1), 7-19.

Bennett, K., & Lyons Z. (2011).Communication skills in medical education: an integrated approach. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(2), 45-56.

Bhatti, M. A., & Alnehabi, M. (2023). Impact of Arabic language proficiency (ALP) on expatriate adjustment and job performance in Saudi Arabia: Role of personal and environmental factors. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 59-73.

Bourdieu, P., & Johnson, R. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press.

Credé, M., & Kuncel, N.R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: the third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6),425-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x

Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. Routledge/Falmer.

David, F. (2014). English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among EFL students. Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(9), 38-41.

Gardner, Richard C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.

Gholami, R. (2012). Social context as an indirect trigger in EFL contexts: Issues and solution. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5(3), 73-82.

Haworth, P., Cullen, J., Simmons, H., Schimanski, L., McGarva, P., &Woodhead, E. (2006). The role of acquisition and learning in young children's bilingual development: A sociocultural interpretation.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(3), 295-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668651

Khalifa, E. (2012). The effects of age factor on learning English: A case study. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5(1), 127-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n1p127

Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. Rouledge.

Lantolf, J.P., Poehner, M.E., & Thorne, S.L. (2020). Sociocultural theory and L2 development. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 223-247). Routledge.

Lantolf, J.P., Thorne, S.L., & Poehner, M.E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 207-226). Routledge.

Lantolf, J. (2002).Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed). Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lori, A. A., & Al-Ansari, S. H. (2001). Relations of some sociocultural variables and attitudes and motivations of young Arab students learning English as a second language. Psychological Reports, 88(1), 91-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2001.88.1.91

Masuda, K., & Arnett, C. (2015). Cognitive linguistics, sociocultural theory and language teaching: Introduction. In Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory (pp. 1-22). De Gruyter Mouton.

Oh, L., & Kit-fong A. T. (2005). Learning Spanish as a heritage language: The role of socio-cultural background variables. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18(3), 229-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310508668744

Poonam, U., Shamim, M., Priya Sh., Reddy, V., & Verma, Sh. (2023). Investigating the relationship between culture and English language learning. European Chemical Bull, 12(8),3478-3489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48047/ecb/2023.12.si8.261

Razmjoo, S. A., & Movahed, M. (2009). On the relationship between socio-cultural factors and language proficiency (Case study: Shiraz University MA students). Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 59-76.

Sadeghi, B., Moshtaghi Kashanian, N., Maleki, A. & Haghdoost, A. (2013). English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among medical students in Iran. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2315-2321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2315-2321

Sadeghi, K. (2013). Learner's starting age of learning EFL and use of language learning strategies. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 6(1), 28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p28

Thorne, S. (2000). Second language acquisition theory and the truth(s) about relativity. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural approaches to second language research (pp. 219-243). Oxford University Press.

Turuk, M. C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky‘s Sociocultural Theory in the second language classroom. ARECLS, 5, 244-262.

Verhoeven, L. & Vermeer, A. (2006). Sociocultural variation in literacy achievement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 189-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00341.x

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: The fundamentals of defectology (vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Reiber & A. Carton (Eds.), Problems of general psychology (vol. 1, pp. 39-285). Plenum Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1990). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (vol. 2). Plenum Press.

Vygotsky, L., S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wertsch, J. V., & Hickmann, M. (1987). Problem solving in social interaction: A microgenetic analysis. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to thought (pp. 251-266). Academic Press.

Published
2023-12-30
How to Cite
MoslehiS., & KafipourR. (2023). Predictors of Language Proficiency among Medical and Paramedical Students: Vygotskian Sociocultural Theory. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.16615