English Adjectival Predicates Taking Subjunctive Complements: What to Change in Curricula
Abstract
Background: Similar projects have been undertaken before with the objective to improve English instruction. However, our work is different in that a) it is based on formal theoretical premises; b) the range of the studied data goes far beyond any analogous paper; c) we compare the subjunctive uses to those of indicative and modal auxiliaries; d) we focus on adjectives and their variable selectional properties concerning the mood in complement clauses.
Purpose: We use vast corpus data to reconsider the information about the English subjunctive mood in complement clauses of adjectival predicates. This is needed to fine-tune the English language curricula for undergraduate language and linguistics students, as well as postgraduate students of different areas.
Method: We searched for eleven non-factive adjectives in two English corpora: the academic subcorpus of the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE). The latter is divided into the British and American subcorpora. The adjectives are advisable, anxious, desirable, eager, essential, imperative, important, necessary, obligatory, urgent, vital. We manually sorted the findings in such a way as to discard all unsuitable, wrong, and deficient contexts relying on syntactic and contextual analysis. Then we calculated the number of occurrences of each structure of interest (the subjunctive mood, modal auxiliaries, the indicative mood) after the adjectives. Finally, we analysed the patterns and made appropriate generalisations for further didactic implementation.
Results: We found that the selectional preferences of the adjectives under study fall into three distinct groups: for modals (anxious, desirable, eager), for the indicative (essential, important, vital), for the subjunctive (the rest). We also came across some by-products in our analysis: modal agreement between predicates and auxiliaries in complement clauses; an unexpected contrast in adjectival selectional patterns across the English varieties; a cross-variety robustness of our generalisation concerning the makeup of the established classes.
Conclusion: The conclusions must be taken into account in designing English for Academic Purposes curricula with the new information replacing outdated facts. It should be made clear that English does not have predicates solely selecting for the subjunctive. This statement is corroborated by a fairly regular variation of mood patterns in complements of non-factive adjectives stemming from certain semantic features inherent in them. However, the nature and the realisation of such features in grammar is to be further tested in linguistic theory.
Downloads
References
Aarts, B. (2012). The subjunctive conundrum in English. Folia Linguistica, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.1
Azizpour, Sh., & Alavinia, P. (2021). The impact of focus on form and focus on forms instruction on grammar acquisition of the subjunctive by Iranian advanced EFL learners. Teaching English Language, 15(1), 215–249. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2021.134368
Bastien, R., & Vinz, S. (2014). If I were an ESL student, would I need to learn the subjunctive? An analysis of teaching the subjunctive mood. Linguistic Portfolios, 8(1), 27–32. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling/vol3/iss1/4
Baunaz, L., & Puskás, G. (2014). On subjunctives and islandhood. In M.-H. Côté & E. Mathieu (Eds.), Variation within and across Romance languages (pp. 233–254). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.16bau
Baunaz, L., & Puskás, G. (2022). A cross-linguistic approach to the syntax of subjunctive mood. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04540-0
Bergs, A., & Heine, L. (2010). Mood in English. In B. Rothstein & R. Thieroff (Eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe (pp. 103–116). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.06ber
Blokh, M. Ya. (2000). Teoreticheskaya grammatika angliyskogo yazyka [English theoretical grammar] (3rd ed). Vysshaya shkola.
Brown, K., & Miller, J. (2013). The Cambridge dictionary of linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049412
Cinque, G. (1990). Ergative adjectives and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 8, 1–39.
Cornilescu, A. (2003). Complementation in English: A minimalist approach. Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti. http://ebooks.unibuc.ro/filologie/cornilescu/cuprins.htm
Crowley, P. (2024). Modal tense: If and wish. Linguistics and Philosophy, 47, 401–443. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10988-023-09401-5
Davies, M. G., & Fuchs, R. P. P. (2015). Expanding horizons in the study of world Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide, 36(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2021). Mood and modality in English. In B. Aarts, L. Hinrichs & A. McMahon (Eds.), An introduction to English linguistics (2nd ed., 207–227). Blackwell Publishers. https://hal.science/hal-03093236/document
Deshors, S. C., & Gries, S. Th. (2020). Mandative subjunctive versus should in world Englishes: A new take on an old alternation. Corpora, 15(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2020.0195
Dobrushina, N. (2012). Subjunctive complement clauses in Russian [Dopolnitel’nyye pridatochnyye s soslagatel’nym nakloneniyem v russkom yazyke]. Russian Linguistics, 36, 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-012-9088-0
Egbert, J., & Baker, P. (2019). Introduction. In J. Egbert & P. Baker (Eds.), Using corpus methods to triangulate linguistic analysis (pp. 1–21), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315112466
von Fintel, K., & Iatridou, S. (2023). Prolegomena to a theory of X-marking. Linguistics and Philosophy, 46, 1467–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-023-09390-5
Givón, T. (1994). Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language, 18(2), 265–337. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.2.02giv
Giannakidou, A. (2009). The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity. Lingua, 119(12). 1883–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.007
Giannakidou, A. (2011a). (Non)veridicality and mood choice: Subjunctive, polarity, and time. In R. Musan & M. Rathert (Ed.), Tense across languages (pp. 59-90). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110267020.59
Giorgi, A. (2009). Toward a syntax of the subjunctive mood. Lingua, 119(12), 1837–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.008
Giorgi, A., & Pianesi, F. (1997). Tense and aspect: Form semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford University Press.
Grisot, C., Blochowiak, J., & Puskás, G. (2022). Predicting verbal mood in complement clauses: the role of the semantic category, the tense and the grammatical aspect of the matrix verb. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5798
Hartmann, J. (2012). Varieties of clausal complementation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Iatridou, S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554352
Jabbarpoor, S. & Tajeddin, Z. (2013). Enhanced input, individual output, and collaborative output: Effects on the acquisition of the English subjunctive mood. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 46(82), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342013000200003
Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics: A collection of papers (pp. 143–173). Mouton.
Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Lee, J. F. K. (2006). Subjunctive were and indicative was: A corpus analysis for English language teachers and textbook writers. In Language Teaching Research 10(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr185oa
Léger, C. (2006). La complémentation de type phrastique des adjectifs en français [Phrasal complementation of adjectives in French] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Univérsité du Québec à Montréal.
Li, J. (2023). How to teach pragmatic functions of English Subjunctive mood. Frontiers in Sustainable Development. 3(7), 81–91.
Meltzer-Ascher, A. (2011). Adjectives and argument structure [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University.
Michelson, T. N., & Uspenskaya, N. V. (1989). Sbornik uprazhneniy po osnovnym razdelam grammatiki angliyskogo yazyka. Prakticheskoye posobiye [A collection of exercises on the main sections of English grammar. Practical guide] (5th ed). Nauka.
Moessner, L. (2020). The history of the present English subjunctive: A corpus-based study of mood and modality (1st ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
Noonan, M. (2007). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 2: Complex constructions (2nd ed., pp. 52–150). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.002
Portner, P. (2012). Verbal mood. In K. Heusinger, C. Maienborn, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning. Volume 2 (pp. 1262-1291). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255072.1262
Ramchand, G. (2018). Alternating adjectives. The Linguistic Review 35(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2017-0023
Rubtsova, M. G. (1989). Obucheniye chteniyu angliyskoy nauchnoy i tekhnicheskoy literatury. Leksiko-grammaticheskiy spravochnik [Learning to read English scientific and technical literature. Lexico-grammatical reference book]. Nauka.
Shevtsova, S. V., Brandukova, M. A., Kuz’mina, I. S., & Parkanskaya, L. V. (1984). The Intermediate Modern English Course. Second Year. Vysshaya shkola.
Stowell, T. (2008). The English Konjunktiv II. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), Time and modality. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory (vol. 75, pp. 251–272). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_11
Copyright (c) 2025 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
