Integrating Digital Multimodal Composition into EFL Writing Instruction
Abstract
Research background: Digital multimodal composition has recently received paramount attention in the instruction of second language writing.
Gap in knowledge: Although the merits of digital multimodal composition have widely been acknowledged by many scholars, the instruction of English writing has still remained monomodal in Iran.
Purpose of the study: The present quasi-experimental study aimed to investigate the differential impacts of the two types of writing (multimodal/monomodal) on English as a Foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing ability in terms of content, communicative achievement, organization, and language across five times.
Methods: To this end, two intact groups, including 59 EFL learners at a university in southeastern Iran participated in the study. The participants were assigned into two comparison groups of multimodal (n = 30) and monomodal (n = 29) compositions. The students in the multimodal group composed five digital essays, while the monomodal group used only the textual mode to produce their essays throughout the semester. Following a repeated measures design, the researchers assessed the participants’ writing ability across five times. A mixed between-within ANOVA was conducted to address the research questions.
Findings: The results revealed that both groups showed significant improvement in their writing ability across time. Furthermore, the multimodal group outperformed the monomodal group in their writing ability.
Value added: The findings suggest that writing instructional practices in Iran should be redefined and updated to accommodate the needs and expectations of the twenty-first century learners.
Downloads
References
Agee, J., & Altarriba, J. (2009). Changing conceptions and uses of computer technologies in the everyday literacy practices of sixth and seventh graders. Research in the Teaching of English, 43, 363-396.
Anderson, K., & Kachorsky, D. (2019). Assessing students' multimodal compositions: An analysis of the literature. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(3), 312-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-11-2018-0092
Bae, J., & Lee, Y. (2012). Evaluating the development of children's writing ability in an EFL context. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(4), 348-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.721424
Baron, D. (2014). From pencils to pixels: The stages of literacy technologies. In E. Wardle & D. Downs (Eds.), Writing about writing: A college reader (pp. 690-710). Bedford/St. Martin's.
Bax, S. (2011). Normalization revisited: The effective use of technology in language education.International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1-15.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). Negotiating the local in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 197-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S02671905060001
Collins, J., & Pascarella, E. T. (2003). Learning on campus and learning at distance: A randomized instructional experiment. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 315-326.
Cope, B., & Gollings, G. (2001). (Eds). Multilingual book production: Technology drivers across the book production supply chain, from the creator to the consumer.Common Ground.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design. Palgrave Macmillan.
Crystal, D. (2011).Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.
De Palma, M. J., & Alexander, K. P. (2015). A bag full of snakes: Negotiating the challenges of multimodal composition.Computers and Composition, 37, 182-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.008
Dymoke, S., & Hughes, J. (2009). Using a poetry wiki: How can the medium support pre-service teachers of English in their professional learning about writing poetry and teaching poetry writing in a digital age? English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8, 91-106.
Ferdig, R. E., & Pytash, K. E. (2014). Exploring digital multimodal composition and digital writing. IGI Global.
Garcia, J., & de Caso, A. (2006).Comparison of the effects on writing attitudes and writing self-efficacy of three different training programs in students with learning disabilities.International Journal of Educational Research, 43(4/5), 272-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.006
Grapin, S. E., & Llosa, L. (2020). Toward an integrative framework for understanding multimodal L2 writing in the content areas. Journal of Second Language Writing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100711
Hawisher, G., & Selfe, C. (2004). Becoming literate in the information age: Cultural ecologies and the literacies of technology. College Composition and Communication, 55(4), 642-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4140666
Hockly, N. (2012). Digital literacies. ELT Journal, 66, 108-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr077
Hundley, M., & Holbrook, T. (2013). Set in stone or set in motion? Multimodal and digital writing with preservice English teachers. Journal of adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6), 500-509.
Intrator, S. M., & Kunzman, R. (2009). Who are adolescents today? Youth voices and what they tell us. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 29-46). Guilford.
Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang Publishing.
Jiang, L. (2018). Digital multimodal composing and investment change in learners' writing in English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 60-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.002
Jiang, L., & Gao, J. (2020). Fostering EFL learners' digital empathy through multimodal composing. RELC Journal, 51(1), 70-85. http://dx.doi.org /. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219898565
Jiang, L., & Luk, J. (2016). Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System, 59, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org /. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.001
Jiang, L., & Ren, W. (2020). Digital multimodal composing in L2 learning: Ideologies and impact. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1753192
Jiang, L., Yang, M., & Yu, S. (2020). Chinese ethnic minority students' investment in English learning empowered by digital multimodal composing. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 954-979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.566
Kern, R., & Schultz, J. M. (2005). Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and the literary in second and foreign language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 381-392.
Khadka, S., & Lee, J. C. (2019). Bridging the multimodal gap: From theory to practice. University Press of Colorado.
Kim, Y., & Belcher, D. (2020). Multimodal composing and traditional essays: Linguistic performance and learner perceptions. RELC Journal, 51(1), 86-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220906943
Kimber, K., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2010). Secondary students' online use and creation of knowledge: Refocusing priorities for quality assessment and learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(5), 607-625.
Kimmons, R., Darragh, J. J., Haruch, A. & Clark, B. (2017). Essay composition across media: A quantitative comparison of 8th grade student essays composed with paper vs. chromebooks.Computers and Composition, 44, 13-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.03.001
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
Lee, S., Lo, Y., & Chin, T. (2021). Practicing multiliteracies to enhance EFL learners' meaning making process and language development: A multimodal problem-based approach.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34, 66-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614959
Li, M., & Akoto, M. (2021). Review of recent research on L2 digital multimodal composing.International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2021070101
Lim, F. V., & Toh, W. (2020). Children's digital multimodal composing: Implications for learning and teaching. Learning, Media, and Technology, 45(4), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1823410
Luke, C. (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 69-91). Routledge.
Lutkewitte, C. (2014). Multimodal composition: A critical source book. Bedford/St. Martin's.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 12, 125-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Mehlenbacher, B., Miller, C. R., Covington, D., & Larsen, J. S. (2000). Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of web-based and conventional writing classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(2), 166-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/47.843644
Miller, K. S., Lindgre, E., & Sullivan, P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension of second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 433-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00140.x
Mohiti Asli, Y. (2019). Developing a multiliteracies pedagogy in mature female English language learners in Iran [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Windsor.
Moje, E. (2009). Standpoints: A call for new research on new and multi-literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 43(4), 348-362.
Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 81-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.05.001
Naghdipour, B., & Koç, S. (2015). The evaluation of a teaching intervention in Iranian EFL writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 389-398.
Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (2), 99-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_4
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perception of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments.Computers and Composition, 38, 16-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001
Oldakowski, T. (2014). A multimodal assignment that enriches literacy learning: The problem. Insight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 9, 70-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46504/09201406ol
Pegrum, M. (2009). From blogs to bombs: The future of digital technologies in education. UWA Publishing.
Rance-Roney, J. (2010). Jump-starting language and schema for English-language learners: Teacher-composed digital jumpstarts for academic reading. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53, 386-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.5.4
Sankey, M. D. (2006). A neomillennial learning approach: Helping non-traditional learners studying at distance. The International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 2(4), 82-99.
Sapp, D. A., & Simon, J. (2005).Comparing grades in online and face-to-face writing courses: Interpersonal accountability and institutional commitment.Computers and Composition, 22, 471-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.005
Scheiter, K., Schubert, C., & Schüler, A. (2017). Self-regulated learning from illustrated text: Eye movement modelling to support use and regulation of cognitive processes during learning from multimedia. British Journal of Education, 88(1), 80-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12175
Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Extending multimedia research: How do prerequisite knowledge and reading comprehension affect learning from text and pictures.Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 73-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.022
Selinker, L. (1992). Rediscovering interlanguage. Longman.
Shin, D., & Cimasko, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer's design of multimedia texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714
Skains, R. L. (2017). The adaptive process of multimodal composition: How developing tacit knowledge of digital tools affects creative writing.Computers & Composition, 43, 106-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.11.009
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
Takayoshi, P., & Selfe, C. L. (2007). Thinking about multimodality. In L. C. Selfe (Ed.), Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers (pp. 1-12). Hampton Press, Inc.
Terrell, S. (2011).Integrating online tools to motivate young English language learners to practice English outside the classroom.International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 16-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2011040102
Unsworth, L., & Mills, K. (2020). English language teaching of attitude and emotion in multimodal composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100712
Vandommele, G., Branden, K.V., Gorp, K. V., & Maeyer, S. D. (2017). In-school and out-of-school multimodal writing as an L2 writing resource for beginner learners of Dutch. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 23-36.
Wang, S. P., & Chen, Y. L. (2018). Effects of multimodal learning analytics with concept maps on college students' vocabulary and reading performance. Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 12-25.
Warschauer, M. (2009). Digital literacy studies: Progress and prospects. In M. Baynham, & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 123-140). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wind, A. M. (2013). Second language writing development from a dynamic systems theory perspective [Conference presentation]. Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching. Lancaster University, UK.
Yeh, E., & Mitrich, S. (2020). Bridging activities: Social media for connecting language learners' in-school and out-of-school literacy practices.International Journal of Computer- Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 48-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2020070104
Yi, Y., Shin, D., & Cimasko, D. (2020). Multimodal composing in multilingual learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 7-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100717
Zhang, Y., & O'Halloran, K. (2019). Empowering the point: Pains and gains of a writer's traversals between print-based writing and multimodal composing. Linguistics and Education, 51, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.04.003
Copyright (c) 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
