Fiction vs. Reality: How Students Discover Real-Life Representations in Prose Using Engaged Reading
Abstract
Background: The reading of fiction texts requires intense effort to integrate mind, emotion, and intrinsic reading motivation, in order to discover real-life representations. There is limited research in this area.
Purpose: This study employs the engaged reading strategy combined with discovery learning, in order to investigate improvements in students’ competence in prose appreciation.
Method: This study used a mixed-method design. Thirty-two Indonesian Language Education students participated in the study. Data was collected using student worksheets, observation, and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was conducted by identifying and interpreting the results of prose appreciation for each reading activity.
Results: This study found that while explaining the theme and through description students were able to activate prior knowledge. The students' reading motivation mainly focused on the intrinsic element of stories. They clearly understood the plot, characterizations, and messages, but supporting details varied because of the differences in students’ knowledge, experience, and social background related to short stories. In the post-reading stage, students revealed new knowledge and mental imagery. Based on our findings, engaged reading combined with discovery learning can enrich students' experience and ability to elaborate information, as well as to discover new knowledge about real-life representation in prose.
Conclusion: Based on the research findings, teachers and lecturers are able to utilize the engaged reading strategy combined with discovery learning to promote students’ ability to read literature. Further research should involve more diverse participants. Experimental research could also examine the advantages and disadvantages of engaged reading and discovery learning.
Downloads
References
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Fact vs fiction-How paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss098
Auyoung, E. (2018). When fiction feels real: Representation and the reading mind. Oxford University Press.
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2019). Academic Emotional Learning: A Critical Component of Self-Regulated Learning in the Emotional Learning Cycle. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 84-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1582345
Bensalah, H., & Gueroudj, N. (2020). The Effect of Cultural Schemata on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension Ability. Arab World English Journal, 11(June), 383-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.26
Berkowitz, M. W. (2011). What works in values education.International Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 153-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.07.003
Brosch, R. (2017). Experiencing narratives: Default and vivid modes of visualization. Poetics Today, 38(2), 255-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-3868527
Burke, M. (2015). The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: Pitfalls, parameters, and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(August), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00442
Cahyani, I., & Yulindaria, L. (2018). The effectiveness of discovery learning model in improving students' fiction writing. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 1(1), 37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v1i1.1281
Caracciolo, M. (2012). Narrative, meaning, interpretation: An enactivist approach. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 367-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9216-0
Cheetham, M., Hänggi, J., & Jancke, L. (2014). Identifying with fictive characters: structural brain correlates of the personality trait ‘fantasy.' Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1836-1844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst179
Chen, J. M., Chen, M. C., & Sun, Y. S. (2014). A tag-based learning approach to knowledge acquisition for constructing prior knowledge and enhancing student reading comprehension.Computers and Education, 70, 256-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.002
D'Olimpio, L., & Peterson, A. (2018). The ethics of narrative art: Philosophy in schools, compassion and learning from stories. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1), 92-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v5i1.1487
De Graaf, A. (2014). The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: Similarity influences health beliefs through self-referencing. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 73-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12015
Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Nunes Filho, G., Jobert, A., et al. (2010). How Learning to Read Changes The Cortical Networks for Vision and Language. Science, 33, 1359-1364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194140
Dill-Shackleford, K. E., Vinney, C., & Hopper-Losenicky, K. (2016). Connecting the dots between fantasy and reality: The social psychology of our engagement with fictional narrative and its functional value. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 634-646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12274
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014). The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037999
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014). The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 498-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037999
Dodell-Feder, D., Lincoln, S. H., Coulson, J. P., & Hooker, C. I. (2013). Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: A new task for assessing theory of mind in adults. PLoS ONE, 8(11), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081279
Edge, C. U., & Olan, E. L. (2020). Reading, literacy, and English language arts teacher education: Making meaning from selfstudies of teacher education practices. In T. Kitchen, A. Berry, S. M. Bullock, A.C. Crowe, M. Taylor, H. Guðjónsdóttir & L. Thomas (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 779-821). Sptinger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1710-1_27-1
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A. (2013). What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034084
Fradj, N. H. B. (2020). The effectiveness of an extr trinsic approach in reading Henry y James ' s Fiction History in Henry James's Fiction. Research Journal of Language, Literature and Humanities, 7(1), 14-23.
Friend, S. (2017). The real foundation of fictional worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95(1), 29-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1149736
Galda, L. (2010). First thing first: Why good books and time to respond to them matter. The Nera Journal, 46(1), iii-iv.
Gasser, L., Dammert, Y., & Murphy, P. K. (2022). How Do children socially learn from narrative fiction.
Getting the lesson, simulating social worlds, or dialogic inquiry? Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09667-4
Handayani, N. D., Mantra, I. B. N., & Suwandi, I. N. (2019).Integrating collaborative learning in cyclic learning sessions to promote students' reading comprehension and critical thinking.International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(5), 303-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n5.777
Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning for teacher: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Hodges, T. S., McTigue, E., Wright, K. L., Franks, A. D., & Matthews, S. D. (2018). Transacting with characters: Teaching children perspective taking with authentic literature. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(3), 343-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2018.1464529
Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M., & Sanders, J. (2016). Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 292-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12076
Hoggan, C., & Cranton, P. (2015). Promoting transformative learning through reading fiction. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(1), 6-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614561864
Hsu, C. T., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Fiction feelings in Harry Potter: Hemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience. Neuroreport, 25(17), 1356-1361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000272
In'am, A., & Hajar, S. (2017). Learning geometry through discovery learning using a scientific approach.International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 55-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.1014a
Jajdelska, E., Butler, C., Kelly, S., McNeill, A., & Overy, K. (2010). Crying, moving, and keeping it whole: What makes literary description vivid? Poetics Today, 31(3), 433-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2010-002
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
Johnson, Dan R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S. (2013). Potentiating empathic growth: Generating imagery while reading fiction increases empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 306-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033261
Khataee, E., & Davoudi, M. (2018). The role of cultural schemata in inferential reading comprehension: An investigation in the Iranian EFL context. Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 11-27.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918
Koopman, E. M. (2016). Effects of literariness on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 82-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000041
Kranzler, A., Hoffman, L. J., Parks, A. C., & Gilham, J. E. (2014). Innovative models of dissemination for school-based interventions that promote youth resilience and well-being. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools. Routledge.
Kristjánsson, K. (2015). Aristotelian Character Education. Routledge.
Kuzmičová, A. (2012). Presence in the reading of literary narrative: A case for motor enactment. Semiotica, 2012(189), 23-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.071
Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 17(3), 37-46.
Magulod, G. C. (2018). Innovative Learning Tasks in Enhancing the Literary Appreciation Skills of Students. SAGE Open, 8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018820382
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition and Emotion, 25(5), 818-833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.515151
Mar, R. A., & Rain, M. (2015). Narrative fiction and expository nonfiction differentially predict verbal ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(6), 419-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1069296
Marsh, E. J., Butler, A. C., & Umanath, S. (2012). Using fictional sources in the classroom: Applications from cognitive psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 449-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9204-0
Massey, D. D., & Heafner, T. L. (2004). Promoting reading comprehension in social studies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(1), 26-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.48.1.3
McGeown, S. P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between adolescent's reading skills, reading motivation, and reading habits. Reading and Writing, 28(4), 545-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9537-9
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students' comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
Nico, H. G., Setyosai, P., Widiati, U., & Degeng, I. N. S. (2016). The effect of inquiry learning strategy versus expository and achievement motivation on the students ' outcomes in reading fiction of critical literacy approach.International Conference on Education Education in 21th Century: Responding to Current Issues (pp. 343-354). University Malang.
Nikolajeva, M. (2013). Did you Feel as if you Hated People?: Emotional literacy through fiction. New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship, 19(2), 95-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2013.813334
Nordin, R., & Eng, L. S. (2017). Text-selection for teaching reading to ESL tertiary students: A study on genre and content preferences.International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 71-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1015a
Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46-e54. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2016-44825-001.
Parrott, H. M., & Cherry, E. (2011). Using structured reading groups to facilitate deep learning. Teaching Sociology, 39(4), 354-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X11418687
Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M. (2016). The use of literary fiction to promote mentalizing ability. PLoS ONE, 11(8), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254
Pollio, H. R., Barlow, J. M., Fine, H. J., & Pollio, M. R. (2023). Psychology and the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy, and education. Taylor & Francis.
Priebe, S. J., Keenan, J. M., & Miller, A. C. (2012). How prior knowledge affects word identification and comprehension. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 131-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9260-0
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work ? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rapp, D. N., Hinze, S. R., Kohlhepp, K., & Ryskin, R. A. (2014). Reducing reliance on inaccurate information. Memory and Cognition, 42(1), 11-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0339-0
Richardson, A. (2011). Defaulting to fiction: Neuroscience rediscovers the romantic imagination. Poetics Today, 32(4), 663-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-1459845
Riddell, A., & Van Dalen-Oskam, K. (2018). Readers and their roles: Evidence from readers of contemporary fiction in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 13(7), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201157
Satriani, I., Emilia, E., & Gunawan, M. H. (2012). Contextual teaching and learning approach to teaching writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 10-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v2i1.70
Shernoff, D. J. (2010). The experience of student engagement in high school classrooms: Influences and effects on long-term outcomes. Lambert Academic Publishing.
Shernoff, D. J., Abdi, B., Andersen, B., & Csikzenmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow in schools revisited: Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In Michael J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools (pp. 219-234). Routledge.
Silva, C., Montant, M., Ponz, A., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Emotions in reading: Disgust, empathy and the contextual learning hypothesis. Cognition, 125(2), 333-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.013
Starr, G. G. (2015). Theorizing imagery, aesthetics, and doubly directed states. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (pp. 246 - 72). Oxford University Press.
Sua, M. R. (2021). Cognitive strategies for developing students' reading comprehension skills using short stories. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias En Educación, 20(44), 233-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162.v20.n43.2021.014
Sugiarti, S., & Prihatini, A. (2019). Engaged reading strategy in literature appreciation learning and its implications on character education. Proceedings of the 4th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (pp. 1-10). EAI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.7-8-2019.2288407
Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016). Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv114
Tarchi, C. (2015). Fostering reading comprehension of expository texts through the activation of readers' prior knowledge and inference-making skills.International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 80-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.013
Trasmundi, S. B., & Cowley, S. J. (2020). Reading: How readers beget imagining. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(September), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531682
Troscianko, E. T. (2013). Reading imaginatively: The imagination in cognitive science and cognitive literary studies. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42(2), 181-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2013-0009
Usher, A. et. al. (2012). What is motivation and why does it matter? Center on Education Policy, George Washington University.
Van de Weghe, R. (2009). Engaged learning. Corwin.
Van Laer, T., De Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers' narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797-817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/673383
Van Leeuwen, N. (2013). The meanings of imagine Part I: Constructive imagination. Philosophy Compass, 8(3), 220-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00508.x
Winarni, E. W., Hambali, D., & Purwandari, E. P. (2020). Analysis of language and scientific literacy skills for 4th grade elementary school students through discovery learning and ict media.International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 213-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13215a
Yudar, R. S., Gowasa, N. S., & Nursafira, M. S. (2019). Exploring the plot analysis Kami (bukan) Sarjana Kertas Novel: Seeking for characters' problems. SELL Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(2), 131-137.
Copyright (c) 2023 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
