Review of Research on the Use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in ELT-related Academic Writing Classrooms
Abstract
Background. The emergence of information and communication technology and the resulting technological devices have influenced the nature and process of composition and the level of students' engagement and participation in writing activities.
Purpose. The present study reviews 50 studies published in peer-reviewed applied linguistics journals from 2000 to 2020 which have investigated the use and implications of technology for teaching and assessing writing in academic contexts.
Methods. The PRIZMA model was applied for records screening and selection and systematic qualitative content analysis was used to explore the content of these studies and identify the most relevant themes. The most relevant sections of these studies (especially, designs and findings) were selected for further analysis and synthesis.
Results. Results of this systematic thematic review are mainly categorized and discussed based on three main themes: (1) Technology Use in Teaching and Learning Academic Writing, (2) Some Technological Tools for Teaching and Assessing Academic Writing, and (3) Practical Implications of Using Technology in Academic Writing Classrooms. Results of this systematic review indicated that growth in the use of technological resources such as computers, applications, and web-based learning environments in teaching and assessing ELT-related writing in academic contexts can enhance the quality of instruction provided.
Implications. Despite some practical limitations for applying these technologies in writing courses, most of the reviewed studies pointed to the fact that technology-mediated writing instruction and assessment can enhance the students' knowledge and use of new digital literacies and, in turn, can lead to improvements in their composing processes and writing competence while working on various genres.
Downloads
References
Alizadeh, M. (2019). Virtual reality in the language classroom: Theory and practice. CALL-EJ, 20(3), 21-30.
Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., & Tromba, P. (1996). Synchronous writing environments: Real-time interaction in cyberspace. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(2), 134-138.
Anson, C. M., & Schwegler, R. A. (2012). Tracking the mind's eye: A new technology for researching twenty-first-century writing and reading processes. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 151-171.
Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14-27.
Ball, C. E., & Kalmbach, J. (2010). On the rawness of reading and writing new media: Materialities, histories, and happenstance. In Ch. E. Ball & J. Kalmbach (Eds.), Reading and writing new media (pp. 1-14). Hampton.
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79-99.
Black, R. (2009). English language learners, fan communities, and 21st-century skills. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 52(8), 688-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.8.4
Bloch, J. (2018). Technology for teaching English as a second language (ESL) writing. In J. I. Liontas, T. & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of english language teaching (pp. 1-8). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0440
Chapelle, C. A., & Sauro, S. (2017).Introduction to the Handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning. The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 1-9). Wiley-Blackwel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069
Chen, Y., Smith, T. J., York, C. S., & Mayall, H. J. (2019). Google earth virtual reality and expository writing for young English learners from a funds of knowledge perspective.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544151
Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013
Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302
Clemens, C., Kumar, V., & Mitchnick, D. (2013). Writing-based learning analytics for education. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 504-505). IEEE.
Cotos, E. (2014). Automated writing evaluation. In Genre-based automated writing evaluation for L2 research writing (pp. 40-64). Palgrave Macmillan.
Dalton, B., Proctor, C. P., Uccelli, P., Mo, E., & Snow, C. E. (2011). Designing for diversity: The role of reading strategies and interactive vocabulary in a digital reading environment for fifth-grade monolingual English and bilingual students. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(1), 68-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X10397872
Darrington, B., & Dousay, T. (2015). Using multimodal writing to motivate struggling students to write. TechTrends, 59(6), 29-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0901-7
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671-689). Sage Publications Ltd.
Doan, K., & Bloomfield, A. (2014). The effects of browse time on the Internet on students' essay scores. TechTrends, 58(6), 63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0805-y
Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 14-26.
Dugartsyrenova, V. A. (2020). Supporting genre instruction with an online academic writing tutor: Insights from novice L2 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100830
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
Gleason, J. (2014). It helps me get closer to their writing experience. Classroom ethnography and the role of technology in third-year FL courses. System, 47, 125-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.023
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Second language writing online: An update. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 1-15. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44574.
Greer, M., & Harris, H. S. (2018). User-centered design as a foundation for effective online writing instruction. Computers and Composition, 49, 14-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.05.006
Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002
Hitchcock, C. H., Rao, K., Chang, C. C., & Yuen, J. W. (2016). Teen ACE for science: Using multimedia tools and scaffolds to support writing. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(2), 10-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500203
Howell, E., Butler, T., & Reinking, D. (2017).Integrating multimodal arguments into high school writing instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(2), 181-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17700456
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Kervin, L. & Mantei, J. (2016). Digital writing practices: A close look at one grade three author. Literacy, 50(3), 133-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12084
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91-109.
Kessler, M. (2020). Technology-mediated writing: Exploring incoming graduate students' L2 writing strategies with activity theory. Computers and Composition, 55, 102542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102542
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). ‘There's an app for that!' Writing Technology reviews for academic journals. RELC Journal, 51(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/0033688220945419.
Krych-Appelbaum, M., & Musial, J. (2007). Students' perception of value of interactive oral communication as part of writing course papers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(3), 131-136.
Law, S., & Baer, A. (2020). Using technology and structured peer reviews to enhance students' writing. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 23-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417740994
Lawrence, S. A., McNeal, K., & Yildiz, M.N. (2009). Summer program helps adolescents merge technology, popular culture, reading, and writing for academic purposes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(6), 483-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.6.3
Lee, S. M. (2019). A systematic review of context-aware technology use in foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1) 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1688836
Leu, D.J., Jr. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet and other digital technologies. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 310-337).International Reading Association.
Levy, M., & Moore, P. J. (2018). Qualitative research in CALL. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10125/44638.
Li, M., & Storch, N. (2017). Second language writing in the age of CMC: Affordances, multimodality, and collaboration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.012
Limpo, L., Nunes, A., & Coelho, A. (2020).Introduction to the special issue on ‘Technology-based writing instruction: A collection of effective tools'. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.01
Lin, V., Liu, G. Z., & Chen, N. S. (2020). The effects of an augmented-reality ubiquitous writing application: A comparative pilot project for enhancing EFL writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1), 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770291
Little, C. W., Clark, J. C., Tani, N. E., & Connor, C. M. (2018). Improving writing skills through technology-based instruction: A meta-analysis. Review of Education: An International Journal of Major Studies in Education, 6(2), 183-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3114
Lotherington, H., & Ronda, N. (2014). 2B or not 2B? From pencil to multimodal programming: New frontiers in communicative competencies. In J. P. Guikema, & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education (pp. 9-28). CALICO Monograph.
Matsuda, P. K., Canagarajah, A. S., Harklau, L., Hyland, K., & Warschauer, M. (2003). Changing currents in second language writing research: A Colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 151-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00016-X
McKenney, S. & Voogt, J. (2009). Designing technology for emergent literacy: The PictoPal initiative.Computers & Education, 52(4), 719-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.013
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidencebased practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education Center for Technology in Learning.
Mehlenbacher, B., Miller, C. R., Covington, D., & Larsen, J. S. (1999). Active and interactive online: A comparison of web-based and conventional writing classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(2), 166-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/47.843644
Merrill, M., & Rodriguez, M. (2005). New literacies: Technology literacy & online writing conferences. International Journal of Learning, 12(5), 293-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/47.843644
Mills, K., & Stornaiuolo. A. (2018). Digital diversity, ideology, and the politics of a writing revolution. In K. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith, & J. Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies and education in digital cultures (pp. 1-9). Routledge.
Mills, K., Stornaiuolo, A., Smith, A., & Pandya, J. (2018). Handbook of writing, literacies and education in digital cultures. Routledge.
Myazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and perceptions of online writing: simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38, 185-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006
Palermo, C., & Wilson, J. (2020). Implementing automated writing evaluation in different instructional contexts: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 63-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.04
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer.
Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2006). The process approach to writing instruction: Examining its effectiveness. Handbook of Writing Research, 275, 290.
Qin, L. T., & Zhang, J. L. (2019). English as a foreign language writers' metacognitive strategy knowledge of writing and their writing performance in multimedia environments. Journal of Writing Research, 12(2), 394-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.06
Raban, B., & Scull, J. (2013). Young learners: Defining literacy in the early years - A contested space. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 100-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911303800116
Rahimi, M., & Pourshahbaz, S. (2019). English as foreign language teachers' TPACK: Emerging research and opportunities. IGI Global.
Reardon, K. A. (2015).Computerized writing assessment technology: Business law students weigh in on its use in the college classroom for developing workplace-ready writing. Computers and Composition, 38, 32-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.005
Rodrigo, R., & Romberger, J. (2017). Managing digital technologies in writing programs: Writing program technologists & invisible service. Computers and Composition, 44, 67-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.03.003
Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Writing Pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1010-1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032340
Sarani, A., Zarei, M. J., & Navidinia, H. (2021). Effect of online flipped classroom on students' writing development at senior high school. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 12(26), 495-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2021.44600.2348
Sauro, S. (2009).Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96-120. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44170.
Schenker, T. (2016). Syntactic complexity in a cross-cultural e-mail exchange. System, 63, 40-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.012
Smith, B. E., Pacheco, M. B., & de Almeida, C. R. (2017). Multimodal codemeshing: Bilingual adolescents' processes composing across modes and languages. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 6-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.001
Snaza, N. (2019). Animated literacies: Literature, affect and the politics of humanism. Duke University Press.
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies.Computers & Education, 131, 33-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
Takayoshi, P. (2015). Short-form writing: Studying process in the context of contemporary composing technologies. Computers and Composition, 37, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.04.006
Taylor, T. (2002). Ten commandments for computers and composition. In The Allyn and Bacon sourcebook for writing program administration (pp. 228-242). Longman.
Vetter, M. A., McDowell, Z. J., & Stewart, M. (2019). From opportunities to outcomes: The Wikipedia-based writing assignment.Computers and Composition, 52, 53-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.01.008
Vojak, Colleen, Kiline, Sonia, Cope, Bill, McCarthy, Sarah, & Kalantzis, Mary. (2011). New spaces and old places: An analysis of writing assessment technology.Computers and Composition, 28(2), 97-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.004
Wang, Pei-ling. (2013). Can automated writing programs help students improve English writing? International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1), 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.6
Warnock, S. (2015). Teaching the OWI course. In B. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.). Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 151-182). The WAC Clearinghouse.
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Erlbaum.
Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 157-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr190oa
Webb Boyd, P. (2008). Analyzing students' perceptions of their learning in online and hybrid first-year composition courses.Computers and Composition, 25(2), 224-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.01.002
Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2019). Technology and writing: Review of research. Computers & Education, 128, 227-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024
Williamson, K., Given, L. M., & Scifleet, P. (2017). Qualitative data analysis. In K. Williamson & G. Johanson (Eds.), Research methods: Information, systems, and contexts (2nd ed., pp. 453-476). Chandos.
Wolsey, T. D. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program.International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 311-329.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0739456X17723971.
Yamac, A. & Ulusoy, M. (2016). The effect of digital storytelling in improving the third graders' writing skills.International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(1), 59-86.
Yeh, S. W., & Lo, J. J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52(4), 882-892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.014
Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146-165.
Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100753
Zhang, M., Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2021). Digital multimodal composing in post-secondary L2 settings: A review of the empirical landscape. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1), 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1942068
Zheng, B, & Warschauer, M. (2017). Epilogue: Second language writing in the age of computer-mediated communication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 61-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.014
Zheng, B., Lawrence, J., Warschauer, M., & Lin, C.-H. (2015). Middle school students' writing and feedback in a cloud-based classroom environment. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 20, 201-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9239-z
Zheng, B., Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Social media in the writing classroom and beyond. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 5, 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0555
Copyright (c) 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
