Exploring Reading Attitudes, Reading Self-Efficacy, and Reading Proficiency in a Blended Learning Context Among EFL Learners

Keywords: L2 reading attitudes, L2 reading self-efficacy, L2 reading proficiency, emergency remote teaching, EFL learning

Abstract

Background. Affective variables such as second language (L2) reading attitudes (RAs) and L2 reading self-efficacy (RSE) have been regarded as factors which influence academic results in regular face-to-face reading instruction. Research has reported that although positive RAs among adolescents may decline as they go through school, they still engage in diverse formal and informal reading environments involving printed and/or digital resources. These attitudes can be impacted by the sudden change in the way instruction is delivered in blended learning contexts which emerged due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Purpose. The present study applied a mixed methods approach to explore the relationship between the L2 RAs, L2 RSE, and L2 reading proficiency (RP) of Chilean high school students in a blended-learning context.

Method. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was adopted to gather data from 124 Chilean high school students. The quantitative data collection was carried out by means of two adapted surveys assessing RAs and RSE, while the reading section of the Preliminary English Test (PET) was administered to determine the RP of participants. The qualitative aspect of the study involved semi structured interviews with ten participants.

Results. Participants displayed moderately positive levels of RA and RSE. Furthermore, a strong correlation was found between RAs and RSE, and RSE was significantly correlated with RP. Qualitative data analysis revealed that the  emergency remote teaching context during the pandemic affected student reading behaviour in relation to the attitudes towards recreational digital reading, and that teacher instruction can influence their RAs and RSE.

Conclusion. It is essential for EFL teachers to nurture student L2 RSE by means of effective and consistent reading activities with increasing challenge that include synchronous and asynchronous learning. Since most participants preferred to complete reading tasks in a recreational digital setting rather than an academic digital one, teachers should incorporate academic reading activities which are more engaging and contextualised to student age and preferences to effectively use the synchronous and asynchronous time at their disposal in blended settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, J. E., & Filler, R. C. (1976). Attitudes and reading.International Reading Association.

Artamonova, T. (2020). L2 learners' language attitudes and their assessment. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 807-826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12498

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (5th ed., pp. 307-337). Information Age Publishing.

Bernhardt, E. (2010). Understanding advanced second-language reading. Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cancino, M., & Towle, K. (2022). Relationships among higher education EFL student perceptions toward fully online language learning and computer self-efficacy, age, gender, and proficiency level in emergency remote teaching settings. Higher Learning Research Communications, 12(0). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v12i0.1317

Cambridge Assessment (2019). The Cambridge English Scale explained: A guide to converting practice test scores to Cambridge English scales scores. Cambridge University Press.

Cambridge English Language Assessment (2014). Cambridge English Preliminary 8 student's book with answers. Cambridge University Press.

Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., Bryant, C., Craft, A., & McKenna, M. C. (2013). Measuring adolescents' attitudes toward reading: A classroom survey. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(7), 565-576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.183

Crawford, B. (2001). Extensive reading in English: Habits and attitudes of a group of Italian university EFL students. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(2), 135-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00137

Creswell J. W., & Guetterman T. C. (2018). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. RELC Journal, 29(2), 187-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900211

de Souza, G. H. S., Jardim, W. S., Lopes Junior, G., Marques, Y. B., Lima, N. C., & Ramos, R. S. (2020). Brazilian students' expectations regarding distance learning and remote classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri/Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 20(4), 65-80.

Dizon, G., & Thanyawatpokin, B. (2021). Language learning with Netflix: Exploring the effects of dual subtitles on vocabulary learning and listening comprehension.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 52-65.

Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 421-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.4.421

Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. http://. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553

Fathi, J., & Soleimani, H. (2020). The effect of reading strategy instruction on reading self-efficacy and reading attitudes: A case of young female Iranian EFL learners. Applied Research on English Language, 9(3), 382-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2019.116944.1461

Fithriani, R. & Alharbi, M. (2021). The adoption of Edmodo in a hybrid EFL writing class: What do Indonesian students and lecturers say?. Asian EFL, 28(2.3), 38-60.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Francom, G. M. (2020). Barriers to technology integration: A time-series survey study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1679055

Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language learning, 55(4), 575-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x

Genc, G., Kulusakli, E., & Aydin, S. (2016). Exploring EFL learners' perceived self-efficacy and beliefs on English language learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 53-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.4

Grgurović, M. (2017). Blended language learning: Research and practice. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (1st ed., pp. 149-168). Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch11

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educase Review, 27.

Hsieh, P. P. H., & Kang, H. S. (2010). Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606-627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00570.x

IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 27.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.

Ismailov, M., & Ono, Y. (2021). Assignment design and its effects on Japanese college freshmen's motivation in L2 emergency online courses: A qualitative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 263-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00569-7

Jang, B. G., Conradi, K., McKenna, M. C., & Jones, J. S. (2015). Motivation: Approaching an elusive concept through the factors that shape it. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 239-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1365

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of texts. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256-270). Sage Publications.

Lee, J., & Schallert, D. L. (2014). Literate actions, reading attitudes, and reading achievement: Interconnections across languages for adolescent learners of English in Korea. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 553-573. http://. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12088

Lee, J., Schallert, D.L. & Kim, E. (2015). Effects of extensive reading and translation activities on grammar knowledge and attitudes for EFL adolescents. System, 52, 38-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.016

Li, Y., & Wang, C. (2010). An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 144-162.

Liao, H. C., & Wang, Y. H. (2018). Using comprehension strategies for students' self-efficacy, anxiety, and proficiency in reading English as a foreign language. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 447-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6648

Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R. & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking Beyond Zoom: Using Asynchronous Video to Maintain Connection and Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383-391. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216192.

Mathewson, G. C. (1994). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R. B.Ruddell, M. R.Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1131-1161).International Reading Association.

McKenna, M.C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B.G., & Meyer, J.P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 283-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.021

McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J., & Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934-956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/748205

Miche, M., Elsässer, V. C., Schilling, O. K., & Wahl, H. W. (2014). Attitude toward own aging in midlife and early old age over a 12-year period: Examination of measurement equivalence and developmental trajectories. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 588-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037259

Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 276-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Oh, E-J. (2016). Relationships among perceived self-efficacy, vocabulary and grammar knowledge, and L2 reading proficiency. English Teaching, 71(2), 3-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.71.2.201606.3

O'Donoghue, B., O'Connor, K., Thompson, A., & McGorry, P. (2021). The need for early intervention for psychosis to persist throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 38(3), 214-219. http://. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.56

Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190510000115

Park, A. Y. (2020). A comparison of the impact of extensive and intensive reading approaches on the reading attitudes of secondary EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 337-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.2.6

Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language.

Teaching, 5(11), 60-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p60

Ro, E., & Chen, C. L. A. (2014). Pleasure reading behavior and attitude of non-academic ESL students: A replication study.

Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 49-72.

Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030

Smith, M. C. (1990). A longitudinal investigation of reading attitude development from childhood to adulthood. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(4), 215-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885958

Tang, B., Bragazzi, N. L., Li, Q., Tang, S., Xiao, Y., & Wu, J. (2020). An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov). Infectious Disease Modelling, 5, 248-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.001

Thoms, J. J. (2020). Re-envisioning L2 hybrid and online courses as digital open learning and teaching environments: Responding to a changing world. Second Language Research & Practice, 1(1), 86-98. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69842.

Urdan, T., & Pajares, F. (Eds.). (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. IAP.

Wang, C., Kim, D. H., Bai, R., & Hu, J. (2014). Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language learners in China. System, 44, 24-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.015

Wang, X., and Jin, Y. (2020). Measuring multiple dimensions of chinese adolescents' attitudes toward reading: introducing the survey of adolescent reading attitudes to chinese teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(6), 661-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1040

Yamashita, J. (2013). Effects of extensive reading on reading attitudes in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 248-263.

Yang, Z., Zeng, Z., Wang, K., Zhong, N., & He, J. (2021). Scientific guidance to fight the pandemic: the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of Thoracic Disease, 13(2), 505-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2021-02

Published
2023-12-30
How to Cite
CancinoM., & GonzalezN. (2023). Exploring Reading Attitudes, Reading Self-Efficacy, and Reading Proficiency in a Blended Learning Context Among EFL Learners. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.16303