Variation in Academic Writing: A Corpus-Based Investigation on the Use of Syntactic Features by Advanced L2 Academic Writers
Abstract
Background: Writing means communication through words whereas academic writing means making careful use of words to communicate ideas to a range of readers and audiences. Therefore, academic writing reflects specificities related to audience, context/discipline and purpose of the use. These specificities result in ample differences in terms of language use.
Purpose: This study investigates disciplinary variation in the use of different syntactic (i.e., clausal, intermediate and phrasal) features in academic writing produced by the Pakistani advanced writers of English as an L2 specializing in different disciplines of arts and humanities, life sciences, physical sciences and social sciences.
Method: For the said purpose, the corpus has been developed from dissertation texts produced by the Pakistani doctoral candidates from 16 academic disciplines of four disciplinary divisions. The analysis has been performed using AntConc Software after tagging with Multidimensional Analysis, and TagAnt Taggers.
Results: The results reveal mixed findings. On the one hand, the results show variation in the use of syntactic features that is observed to be marked by the difference in the frequency of the different types of the said features across disciplines. On the other hand, the results show a similarity in the use of syntactic features that has been evidenced by the finding that the most and least frequently used features are identical across disciplines.
Conclusion: These results suggest both heterogeneity and homogeneity in the use of syntactic features by the Pakistani advanced L2 academic writers. The results of this study have implications for educators, policy makers, and syllabus designers to ensure discipline-specific instruction, and incorporation of the discipline-specific syntactic features into the academic curricula for supporting academic writing development skills in the students particularly at the advanced level of education.
Downloads
References
Abid, A., Manzoor, H., & Siddique, A. R. (2022). Cross-cultural examination of argumentative English essays: A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani and Chinese learners. Linguistic Forum, 4(4), 40–48.
Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Siddique, A. R. (2019). Organisational skills in academic writing: A study on coherence and cohesion in Pakistani research abstracts. Languages, 4(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4040092.
Ahmad, M. (2022). Phrasal complexity in Pakistani academic writing: A corpus-based comparative study of doctoral dissertations across disciplines (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Siddique, A. R. (2022). Exploring disciplinary variation in Pakistani academic writing: A corpus-based research on doctoral dissertations. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(4), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-IV)06.
Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Siddique, A. R. (2023a). Determining the L2 academic writing development stage: A corpus-based research on doctoral dissertations. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0028.
Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Siddique, A. R. (2023b). Features characterizing academic writing: A corpus-based research on dissertations from hard and soft science disciplines. City University Research Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 6(1), 61–78.
Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Siddique, A. R. (2023c). Variation in academic writing: A corpus-based research on syntactic features across four disciplinary divisions. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 17(2), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10015816.
Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008.
Azher, M., Faiz, R., Izhar, A., Nisa, R., & Ali, S. (2019). Revealing disciplinary variation in Pakistani academic writing: A multidimensional analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 258–272.https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p258.
Aziz, A., Pathan, H., & Ali, S. (2016). Linguistic variation across major disciplinary groups of Pakistani academic writing: Multidimensional analysis of doctoral theses. ARIEL-An International Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 27, 27–60.
Becher, T. (1981). Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education, 6(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078112331379362.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016 Eds.). Academic writing: Challenging the stereotypes. In D. Biber & B. Gray (Eds.), Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing (pp. 1–42). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Contrasting the grammatical complexities of conversation and academic writing: Implications for EAP writing development and teaching. Language in Focus, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/lifijsal-2016-0001.
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0034701.
Casal, J. E., Lu, X., Qiu, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Syntactic complexity across academic research article part-genres: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100996.
Dong, J., Wang, H., & Buckingham, L. (2023). Mapping out the disciplinary variation of syntactic complexity in student academic writing. System, 113, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102974.
Elliott, T. (2019). Variation in use of nouns as nominal premodifiers in advanced student writing across academic disciplines [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Iowa State University.
Fatima, N., Siddique, A. R., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Linguistic variations in the abstracts of Pakistani dissertations: A multidimensional analysis across disciplines. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 7(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.33195/btm19817
Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. John Benjamins Publishing Company.https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71.
Housseine, B., & Oifaa, T. (2020). The significance of English scientific writing proficiency for publishing purposes: The case of Moroccan EFL PhD students at the Euromed University of Fes. Linguistic Forum, 2(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2020.2.3.3.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116–125.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002
Jalilifar, A., White, P., & Malekizadeh, N. (2017). Exploring nominalization in scientific textbooks: A cross-disciplinary study of hard and soft sciences. International Journal of English Studies, 17(2), 1–20.https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2017/2/272781
Kachru, B., Kachru, Y., & Nelson, C. L. (2006). Handbook of World Englishes. Blackwell.
Khamaiseh, M. (2023). Toward a model for analyzing the rhetorical move structure of the master thesis introductions in applied linguistics. Linguistic Forum, 5(4), 1–29.
Lan, G., & Sun, Y. (2018). A corpus-based investigation of noun phrase complexity in the L2 writings of a first-year composition course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 14–24.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.001
Lan, G., Zhang, Q., Lucas, K., Sun, Y., & Gao, J. (2022). A corpus-based investigation on noun phrase complexity in L1 and L2 English writing. English for Specific Purposes, 67, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.02.002
Lu, X. (2014). Computational methods for corpus annotation and analysis. Springer.
Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
Lu, X. (2017). Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment. Language Testing, 34(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710675.
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2020). The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100832.
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., Liu, Y., Kisselev, O., & Yoon, J. (2021). The relationship between syntactic complexity and rhetorical move-steps in research article introductions: Variation among four social science and engineering disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101006
Mahboob, A. (2008). Pakistani English: Morphology and syntax. In R. Mesthrie, B. Kortmann & E. Schneider (Ed.), 4 Africa, South and Southeast Asia (pp. 578–592). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208429.2.578.
Mahmood, M. A. (2009). A corpus-analysis of Pakistani English [Doctoral dissertation]. Bahauddin Zakariya University.
Nasseri, M. (2021). Is postgraduate English academic writing more clausal or phrasal? Syntactic complexification at the crossroads of genre, proficiency, and statistical modelling. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100940.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100940
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Olthouse, J. M. (2013). MFA writers’ relationships with writing. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13507972
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492.
Ortega, L. (2015). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 82–94.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008
Parry, S. (1998). Disciplinary discourse in doctoral education. Higher Education, 36, 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003216613001
Pervez, N., Siddique, A. R., & Ahmad, M. (2024). Analyzing linguistic variations in the discussion sections of Pakistani English research articles: A multidimensional study. LinguisticaSilesiana, 45(1), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2024.150392
Rahman, T. (1990). Pakistani English: The linguistic description of a non-native variety of English. National Institute of Pakistan Studies.
Qasim, S., Hussain, Z., & Mahmood, M. A. (2017). A critical analysis of structuralist variations in academic writing. Journal of Research (Humanities), 53(1), 217–240.
Rashid, A., & Mahmood, M. A. (2019). Linguistic variations across disciplines: A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani research articles. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 34–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).04
Saricaoglu, A., Bilki, Z., & Plakans, L. (2021). Syntactic complexity in learner-generated research paper introductions: Rhetorical functions and level of move/step realization. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101037
Saricaoglu, A., & Atak, N. (2022). Syntactic complexity and lexical complexity in argumentative writing: Variation by proficiency. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 16(1), 56–73.
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33(2), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527
Szczygłowska, T. (2022). Lexical verbs of epistemic modality in academic written English: Disciplinary variation. Linguistica Silesiana,43, 91–111. https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2022.141219
Szczygłowska, T. (2023). Adverbial cohesion in English-medium academic prose: Disciplinary and linguacultural considerations. Linguistica Silesiana, 44(2), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2023.146648
Talaat, M. (1993). Lexical variation in Pakistani English. In R. J. Baumgardner (Ed.), The English Language in Pakistan (pp. 55–62). Oxford University Press.
Tian, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Exploring nominalization in academic writing: A comparative study of shipbuilding and oceanography engineering and linguistics. Athens Journal of Philology, 10(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.10-2-2.
Wang, M., & Lowie, W. (2021). Understanding advanced level academic writing on syntactic complexity. In Proceedings of the 35th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 455–465). Association for Computational Lingustics.
Xue, Q., & Ge, T. (2021). A corpus-based study on phrasal complexity in computer science abstracts of novice and advanced writers. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11, 808–822. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.115062
Yin, S., Gao, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System, 97, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102427
Yoon, H. J., & Polio, C. (2017). The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. Tesol Quarterly, 51(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.296
Ziaeian, E., & Golparvar, S. E. (2022). Fine-grained measures of syntactic complexity in the discussion section of research articles: The effect of discipline and language background. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 57, 101116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101116
Copyright (c) 2024 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
