A Reconsidered Language Model Approach to the Problem of Verb Aspectual Pairs in the Russian Language
Abstract
Background. The problem of verb aspectual pairs in Russian studies remains relevant and still causes discussion, despite the large number of studies conducted. Triplets attract intense interest due to their special position in the system of aspectual forms and the implicitness of an aspectual pair of verbs in the triple. Another fundamental issue that causes a lot of discussion is the so-called hypothesis of empty prefix.
Purpose. The purpose is to obtain objective quantitative evaluation of the semantic distance between the verbs in triplets: the basic imperfective verb, the perfective verb, and the secondary imperfective verb. The main problem we solve is which of the two imperfective verbs is semantically closer to the perfective verb, i.e. which pair is aspectual.
Materials and Methods. So far, there have been no operational methods for determining verb aspectual pairs. With the advent of large text corpora and Language Models technology, it has become possible to evaluate the semantic similarity of words using rigorous methods. To solve the issues, the computational technique of embeddings (vector semantics) is used. The present study covers 440 triplets. The data on their frequency and collocations were taken from the Russian subcorpus of the Google Books Ngram database.
Results. For both language models applied, statistical test shows greater semantic similarity for the pairs of perfective and secondary imperfective than for the pairs of basic imperfective and perfective. According to one or both of the models, for most of prefixes considered, the average distance between the pairs of basic imperfective and perfective is statistically significantly greater than between the pairs of perfective and secondary imperfective.
Conclusion. The article presents quantitative analysis of identity of semantics in aspectual pairs of triplets. Secondary imperfective verb form is shown to be statistically closer to the perfective verb than basic imperfective form. This is an argument in favor of the point of view that secondary imperfective verbs form aspectual pairs with perfective verbs. Also, the models applied show that prefixes contribute to the semantics of the perfective verbs. This fact stands against the hypothesis of empty prefixes.
Downloads
References
Akhmanova, O. S. (1974). Dictionary of Russian Homonyms [Slovar’ omonimov russkogo yazyka]. Soviet Encyclopedia Publishing.
Apresyan, Yu. D. (1995) Selected works (vol. 2). School of Languages of Russian Culture.
Becker, R. B., Boutet, D., Cienki A., Debras C., Denisova D., Gonzales-Marques M., Iriskhanova O., Morgenstern F., Muller C., & Richter, N. (2018). Aspectuality across Languages: Event construal in speech and gesture (vol. 62). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dickey, S. M. (2024). Russian aspect from a cognitive linguistic perspective. Russian Linguistics, 48(1), 11.
Gorbova, E. (2011). Species pairing of the Russian verb: Problems and solutions. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 4, 20-45.
Gorbova, E. V., & Chuikova, O. I. (2023). Frequency dynamics as a criterion for differentiating inflection and word formation (in relation to Russian aspectual pairs). In Computational linguistics and intelligent technologies based on Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialog 2023”. 142-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2075-7182-2023-22-142-160
Gorbova, E. V. (2019). Two-component model of the Russian aspect: conditions, predictions, confirmations. Slavistika, 23(1), 45-61.
Gorbova, E.V., Chuikova, O. Iu., & Sharygina, S. S. (2021). Imperfectivability of Russian prefixal perfectives: Regularity and peculiarities. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 4, 91-130.
Gorbova, E. V. (2020). Aspectual triplets of the Russian verb in diachrony: evidence from the Russian National Corpus. In Computational linguistics and intelligent technologies based on Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialog 2020”. M.: RGGU. 321-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2075-7182-2020-19-321-347
Gunduz, H. (2024). Comparative analysis of BERT and FastText representations on crowdfunding campaign success prediction. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e2316 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2316
Heffernan, K., Çelebi, O., & Schwenk, H. (2022). Bitext mining using distilled sentence representations for low-resource languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12654.
Ivanov, V. V. (1990). Historical grammar of the Russian language. Prosveschenie.
Janda, L. A. (2012). Russian prefixes as a verb classifier system. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 6, 3-47.
Janda, L., & Lyashevskaya, O. (2011). Aspectual Pairs in the Russian National Corpus. Scando-Slavica, 57(2), 201-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2011.631780
Kestler, T. (2025). Big Data and Ideational Institutionalism. Reconsidering the Possibilities and Limitations of Google Ngram in the Study of Ideas. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 66(2), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-024-00569-4.
Khrakovskij, V. S. (2005) Aspectual triplets and aspectual pairs. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 9, 46-59.
Kuznetsova, J., & Sokolova, S. (2016). Aspectual triplets in Russian: Semantic predictability and regularity. Russian linguistics, 40(3), 215-230.
Petrukhina, E. (2023). Особенности аспектуальной деривации в русском языке (на славянском фоне) [Features of aspectual derivation in russian (on the slavic background)]. Јужнословенски филолог, 79(2), 11-27.
Kuznetsova, Y. L., & Janda, L. A. (2013). Prefixes from the point of view of cognitive linguistics and typology (an answer to the paper by A.A. Zaliznjak and I.L. Mikaeljan). Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 4, 87-96.
Laura, J., Endresen, A., Kuznetsova, J., Lyashevskaya, O., Makarova, A., Nesset, T., & Sokolova, S. (2013). Why Russian aspectual prefixes aren’t empty: Prefixes as verb classifiers. Slavica.
Muchnik, J. P. (1971). Grammatical Categories of the Verb and the Name in the Modern Russian Literary Language. Nauka.
Pereltsvaig, A. (2022). Aspect lost, aspect regained: Restructuring of aspectual marking in American Russian. In Aspectual inquiries (pp. 369-395). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_16
Pertsov, N. V. (2001). Invariants in Russian inflection. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture.
Popova, Z. D. (2006). The category of the Slavic verb form: discussions, possible solutions. Yuzhnoslavenskiy philology, 62, 233-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/JFI0662251P
Schooneveld, C. H. (1978). Semantic Transmutations. Prolegomena to a Calculus of Meaning. V. 1: The Cardinal Semantic Structure of Prepositions, Cases, and Paratactic Conjunctions in Contemporary Standard Russian. Physsardt.
Sichinava, D. V. (2011). Materials for the project of corpus description of Russian grammar. Moscow. http://rusgram.ru.
Solovyev, V. (2024). Using the google books Ngram corpus to study social evolution. Social Evolution & History, 23(2), 144-164.
Solovyev, V. D., & Bochkarev, V. V. (2015). Evolution of the aspectual triplets in Russian through the prism of Google Ngram. In Proceedings of the international conference «Corpus linguistics – 2015» (pp. 425-434). SpbSU.
Solovyev, V., & Bochkarev, V. (2022). The case for aspectual pairs reopened. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 78, 67-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.17223/19986645/78/4
Solovyev, V., Bochkarev, V., & Bayrasheva, V. (2022). Aspectual pairs: prefix vs. suffix way of formation. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 26(4), 1114-1135. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-27394.
Solovyev, V., & Ivleva, A. (2024). How to Detect Imbalances in the Google Books Ngram Corpus?. In International Conference on Speech and Computer (pp. 334-348). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Tatevosov, S. G. (2010). Primary and secondary in the structure of imperfectives. In Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies [Trudy ILI RAN], Redundancy in the Grammar of Language (vol. VI(2), pp. 299-321). Nauka.
Titarenko, E. Y., & Balatskaya, Y. Y. (2022). Aspectuality and Variability of Verbal Phraseological Units in Russian Language and Speech. Nauchnyi dialog, 11 (3), 152-170.
Tyulina, N., (2025) “Empirical Analysis of Russian Aspectual Prefixes: A Computational Approach to Productivity & Semantic Relatedness”. Society for Computation in Linguistics 8(1): 45. https://doi.org/10.7275/scil.3181
Wiemer, B. (2019). About semantically invariant and grammatically trivial in Russian aspect. In Collection of papers on the 85th anniversary of V. S. Khrakovskij, (pp. 43-66). Languages of Slavic Cultures, Moscow.
Zalizniak, A. A., & Mikaelian, I. L. (2014). Russian verb prefix and the problem of aspectual pairing. Mundoeslavo, 13, 19-33.
Zalizniak, A. A., & Mikaelian, I. L. (2012). On some arguable points of Laura Janda’s aspectological theory. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 6, 48-65. https://dx.doi.org/10.31857/SX0000375-5-1.
Copyright (c) 2025 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
