Exploring How Rhetorical Organization Contributes to the Readability of Essays
Abstract
The facilitative benefits of genre-specific reading have often been cited as a truism in the field of writing education. In line with this, writing center self-access libraries typically provide a selection of composition texts, including rhetorics (anthologies of model paragraphs and essays). Readability formulae (e.g., the Lexile Readability Formula) are often used to determine whether these texts will be a good fit for potential readers, and although the Lexile Formula reliably and validly assesses two features (i.e., semantic and syntactic), it does not consider other contributing features during the text selection process (e.g., rhetorical organization). To address this, this sequential, mixed-methods study explored the effects of rhetorical organization on undergraduate English language learners’ perceptions of difficulty when reading exemplars (i.e., essays) excerpted from rhetorics. The results indicated that rhetorical organization influences readability both as (a) a primary (i.e., an isolated feature) and (b) a conjoined feature (i.e., comprising two or more associated entities where the second impacts the first). The article also provides a suggestion for writing education professionals and the publishing industry: Readability formulae should be administered in a hybrid fashion, where additional features such as rhetorical organization are subjectively considered when assessing the difficulty of exemplars.
Downloads
References
Abe, M. (2009). Noticing in comparing own essay with model essay: An exploratory study of Japanese L2 writers. The bulletin of the Kanto-koshin-etsu English Language Education Society, 23, 71-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20806/katejo.23.0_71
Armbruster, B, B. (2016). Matching readers and texts: The continuing quest. In Lapp, D., Flood, F., & Farnan, N. (Eds), Content area reading and learning: Instructional strategies (pp. 47-64). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.06.08
Baker, J. R. (2019). Writing about the writing center in the Asian context: Exploring the mis/match between the reading levels of self-access materials and the students who visit the center. The Asian ESP Journal, 15(3), 256-285. https://www.asian-esp-journal.com/volume-15-issue-3-december-2019.
Baker, J. R. (2020). A checklist for use with the Lexile Readability Formula when choosing materials for the writing center self-access library. Asian ESP Journal, 16(61), 9-68.
Baker, J. R., & Chung, Y. S. (2018). Writing about the writing center: Exploring what factors motivate writing center usage outside the north American context. Asian ESP Journal, 14(7.1), 7-56.
Bengeleil, N. F., & Paribakht, T. S. (2004). L2 reading proficiency and lexical inferencing by university EFL learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 61(2), 225-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.2.225
Bereiter, C. (1978). Discourse type, schema, and strategy: A view from the standpoint of traditional design. Paper presented at the AERA, Toronto.
Bloom, L. (1999). The essay canon. College English, 61(4), 401-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(89)80016-7
Bock, M. (1980). Some effects of titles on building and recalling text structures. Discourse Processes, 3(4), 301-311. https://doi.org/1080/01638538009544494.
Calfee, R. C., & Curley, R. (1984). Structure of prose in the content areas. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 161-180). International Reading Association.
Carrell, P. L. (1983a). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1(2), 81-92.
Carrell, P. L. (1983b). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33(2), 183-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00534.x
Carrell, P. L. (1984a). The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 441-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586714
Carrell, P. L. (1984b). Evidence of a formal schema in second language comprehension. Language Learning, 34(2), 87-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14671770.1984.tb01005.x
Carrell, P. L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 461-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586498
Chall, J. S., Bissex, G. L., Conrad, S. S., & Harris-Sharples, S. (1996). Qualitative assessment of text difficulty. Brookline Books.
Chall, J.S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Brookline Books.
Chromik, M. (2002). Proofreading, its value, and its place in the writing center (EJ929331). ERIC.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26, 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.1968.tb00749.x
Dalfonos, D. (2003). Grammy rewards. In T. Cooley (Ed.), The Norton sampler: Short essays for composition (pp. 206-208). Norton & Company.
Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 9(3), 185-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288722
Devanadera, A. C. (2018) Assessing Vietnamese EFL students' writing in the light of world Englishes. The Journal of English as and International Language, 13(2), 88-105.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69(2), 145-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069002145
Dubay, W. (2007a). Unlocking language: The classic readability studies. Impact Information.
Dubay, W. (2007b). Smart language: Readers, readability, and the grading of the text. Impact Information.
Dubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (1993). Predicting word meanings from contextual clues: Evidence from L1 readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 181-202). Abex.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.
Ferris, D., & Hedgcock J. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flick, W. C, & Anderson, J. I. (1980). Rhetorical difficulty in scientific English: A study in reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 14(3), 345-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586599
Fooh, R. W. K. (1989). A reading experiment with L2 readers of English in Hong Kong: Effects of the rhetorical structure of expository texts on reading comprehension. Hong Kong papers in linguistics and language teaching, 12, 49-62. ERIC.
Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and health, 25(10), 1229-1245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015
Freedle, R., & Kostin, I. (1991). The prediction of SAT reading comprehension item difficulty for expository prose passages. ERIC.
Freedle, R., & Kostin, I. (1993). The prediction of TOEFL reading comprehension item difficulty for expository prose passages for three item types: Main Idea, inference, and supporting idea items. ERIC.
Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus leveling: Both of these procedures can help teachers select books for readers at different stages. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 286-292.
Gilliand, G. (1972). Readability. Hodder and Stoughton.
Goh, S. T. (1990). The effects of rhetorical organization on expository prose on ESL readers in Singapore. RELC Journal, 21(2), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100201
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2016). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Language Teaching, 49(3), 339-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000082
Grimes, J. E. (1975). The thread of discourse. ERIC.
Gunning, T. G. (2003). The role of readability in today's classrooms. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 175-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200307000-00005
Harris, S. (2001). Freedom and security. In G. Levin (Ed.), Prose models (4th ed., pp. 389-392). Wadsworth.
Harrison, C. (1980). Readability in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Hirsch, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8(2), 689-696.
Hughes, L. (2007). Salvation. In S. V. Buscemi, & C. Smith (Eds.), 75 readings plus (pp. 10-14). McGraw-Hill.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of second language writing, 16(3), 148-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Johns, A. M. (2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll (Ed.) Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 195-217). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524810.014
Kintsch, W., & Miller, J. R. (1981). Readability: A view from cognitive psychology. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 220-232). International Reading Association.
Kintsch, W., & Vipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 329-366). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Klare, G. (1963). The measurement of readability. Iowa State Press.
Klare, G. (1984). Readability. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 1, pp. 681-744). Longman.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Kuzel, A. 1992. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. Crabtree, & W. Miller (Eds). Doing qualitative research (pp. 31-44). Sage.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Lei, J. (2010). An investigation of the effects of discourse types on Taiwanese college students reading strategy use [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Lexile. (2010). Lexile Professional Anaylzer. http://lexile.com/analyzer.
Liao, M. T., & Chen, C. H. (2009). Rhetorical strategies in Chinese and English: A comparison of L1 composition textbooks. Foreign Language Annals, 42(4), 695-720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01050.x
Lively, B., & Pressey, S. (1923). A method for measuring the vocabulary burden of textbooks. Educational Administration and Supervision, 9, 389-398.
Lorge, I. (1944). Word lists as background for communication. Teachers College Record, 45(8), 543-552. http://www.tcrecord.org.
McDonald, C. P. (2003). A view from the bridge. In T. Cooley (Ed.), The Norton sampler: Short essays for composition (pp. 37-41). Norton & Company.
Merriam, S. B. (1991). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
Mesmer, H. (2008). Tools for matching readers to texts. Guilford Press.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. North-Holland.
Meyer, B. J. F. (2003). Text coherence and readability. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 204-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/0001136320030700000007
Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1162357
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019) Reproducibility and replicability in science. National Academies Press.
Nunan, D. (1996). Towards autonomous learning: Some theoretical, empirical, and practical issues. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L., Li, W. W. F. Or, & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 13-26). Hong Kong University Press.
Ojemann, R. H. (1932). The reading ability of parents and factors associated with reading difficulty of parent education materials. Presented at the meeting of Iowa Academy of Science. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/222999801.pdf.
Paiz, J. M. (2017). Uses of and attitudes towards OWLs as L2 writing support tools. Asian EFL Journal, 19(1), 56-80.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195-224.
Pearson, P. D., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., & Barr, R. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of reading research. Routledge.
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of second language writing, 10(4), 277-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7
Schirmer, A., & Lockman, B. R. (2001). How do I find a book to read? Middle and high school students use a rubric for self-selecting material for independent reading. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(1), 36-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990103400105
Schwartz, M., & Flammer, A. (1981). Text structure and title-effects on comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(3), 61-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S00225371(81)90301-7
Selinker, L., Trimble, R. M., & Trimble, L. (1976). Presuppositional rhetorical information in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 281-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3585704
Sharp, A. (2002). Chinese L1 schoolchildren reading in English: The effects of rhetorical patterns. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 1-22.
Spiro, R. J., & Taylor, B. M. (1980). On investigating children's transition from narrative to expository discourse: The multidimensional nature of psychological text classification. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED199666.
Strube, M. J. (2000). Reliability and generalizability theory. In L. G. Grimm, & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics (p. 23-66). American Psychological Association.
Talbot, D., Ng, P., & Allan, A. (1991). Hong Kong students reading expository prose: Replication of the effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers by Patricia Carrell. Working Papers of the Department of English, City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, 3(1), 52-65. https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk.
Traig, J. (2008). A guide to proper hand-washing technique. In M. L. Conlin (Ed.), Patterns plus: A short prose reader with argumentation (9th ed., pp. 176-178). Houghton Mifflin.
Weaver, B. M. (2000). Leveling books K-6: Matching readers to text. International Reading Association.
Yali, S., & Jiliang, C. (2007). Effects of text type and test type on L2 reading comprehension test performance. CELEA Journal, 30(2), 16-14.
Zakaluk, B. L., & Samuels, S. J. (1988). Toward a new approach to predicting text comprehensibility. In B. L. Zakaluk, & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Readability: Its past, present, and future (pp. 121-140). International Reading Association.
Zhang, X. (2008). The effects of formal schema on reading comprehension - An experiment with Chinese EFL readers. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 13(2), 197-214
Copyright (c) 2021 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
