Self-Regulated Learning and Sociodemographic Factors in Students’ L1/L2 Writing Proficiency
Abstract
Background: Academic writing is a complex and demanding activity in which students have to regulate their (meta)cognitive, motivational, and linguistic processes and self-regulatory writing strategies might serve as a tool to accomplish writing tasks. The research was done as part of a verification of Zimmerman & Risemberg’s (1997) model of self-regulation in writing. Previous research on the relationships between students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) and writing performance has suggested their positive impact.
Purpose: This paper provides insights into Croatian university students’ first/second language (L1/L2) writing performance regarding the SRL strategy use.
Method: Students’ written performance in both L1 (Croatian) and L2 (English) was checked, and the contributions of SRL and sociodemographic factors were explored. A total of 104 students from the initial and final years of teacher education study were included in the research. A quantitative research method was used including the following instruments: The learning orientation scale, the Perceived academic control scale, the Croatian version of the values subscale, Writing strategies questionnaire.
Results: Descriptive analyses revealed that students’L1/L2 writing proficiency was on average. There was no difference between L1 and L2 writing proficiency. Furthermore, the study showed that students mostly initiated learning goal orientation, writing tasks were valuable to them and they had more results of academic control over the mentioned tasks. Participants mostly used the most effective writing strategy - checking and correcting the text. The final study year students had better L1 writing proficiency compared to the initial study year students. Such results were expected since students were exposed to the extensive L1 academic experience, which was not the case with the exposure to learning English as a foreign language (EFL learning), resulting in a lower level of L2 essay writing proficiency. Success in L1 writing proficiency was explained more by cognitive and less by sociodemographic and motivational factors. The greater academic control over writing assignments and the lower goal orientation on avoiding effort was shown, the greater success was achieved. Success in L2 writing proficiency was mostly explained by cognitive factors, but also significantly by some sociodemographic and motivational factors. The higher GPA in L2 and the less asking for help and writing by the model strategy was employed, the greater success in writing assignments was achieved. The study indicated the importance of mastering SRL, especially cognitive factors in both L1 and L2 learning.
Implication: The implications of the study were discussed which may benefit L1/L2 teachers to teach their students SRL writing strategies by which students could self-regulate their thoughts, feelings, and behaviours throughout the writing process to achieve academic success.
Downloads
References
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0804-4
Almazloum, M. (2018). A mixed methods study: The impact of self-regulated learning on L2 writing and strategy use [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Western Ontario. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5355.
Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). EJ extra: A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. The English Journal, 100(6), 14-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23047875.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
Bećirović, S., Brdarević-Čeljo, A., & Polz, E. (2021). Exploring the relationship between language learning strategies, academic achievement, grade level, and gender. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 93-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10771
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
Brooks, G. (2013). Assessment and academic writing: A look at the use of rubrics in the second language writing classroom. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 17, 227-240. http://hdl.handle.net/10236/10548.
Burić, I. (2010). Provjera Pekrunove teorije kontrole i vrijednosti [A test of Pekrun's theory of control and value] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Zagreb.
Camping, A., Graham, S., Ng, C., Aitken, A., Wilson, J. M., & Wdowin, J. (2020). Writing motivational incentives of middle school emergent bilingual students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(9), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10046-0
Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2001).Teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press. http://assets.cambridge.org/052180/1273/sample/0521801273ws.pdf.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe (2001).Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg.
Crystal, D. (2009). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Dockrell, J. E., Marshall, C. R., & Wyse, D. (2016). Teachers' reported practices for teaching writing in England. Reading and Writing, 29(3), 409 - 434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9605-9
Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2010). Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook (6th ed.). Psychology Press.
Golparvar, S. E., & Khafi, A. (2021). The role of L2 writing self-efficacy in integrated writing strategy use and performance. Assessing Writing, 47, 100504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100504
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3 - 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457 - 478). Erlbaum.
Graham, S. (2013). It all starts here: Fixing our national writing crisis from the foundation. https://srsdonline.org/teachers-of-writing.
Graham, S., Cappizi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1015-1042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
Graham, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Writing education around the globe: Introduction and call for a new global analysis. Reading and Writing, 29, 781-792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9640-1
Graham, S., Liu, K., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., & Holzapel, J. (2018). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279 - 304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277 - 303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
Graham, S., Camping, A., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., Wilson, J. M., Wdowin, J., & Ng, C. (2021). Writing and writing motivation of students identified as English language learners.International Journal of TESOL Studies, 3(1), 1 - 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2021.01.01
Hammann, L. (2005). Self-regulation in academic writing tasks.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 15 - 26. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe.
Hayes, I. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In R. Indrisano & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Perspectives on writing: Research theory and practice (pp. 6-44).International Reading Association.
Hyland, K. (2004). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Jolly, D. (1984). Writing tasks. Cambridge University Press.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509336986
Kuhlemeier, H., Van Til, A., Hemker, B., De Klijn, W., & Feenstra, H. (2013). Balans van de schrijfvaardigheid in het basis - en speciaal basisonderwijs 2 [Second evaluation of writing skills in primary education and special education]. Stichting Cito Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling.
MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2004). Insights from instructional research or revision with struggling writers. In L. Allal, I. Changuoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 125 - 137). Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_8
Magno, C. (2009). Self-regulation and approaches to learning in English composition writing. TESOL Journal, 1, 1-16. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1579404.
Mihaljević Djigunović, J., & Bagarić, V. (2007). English in Croatia - From needs to achievements. Metodika, 8(1), 38-50.
Neumann, A. (2012). DESI - Text production. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castello, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, & L. V. Waes (Eds.), Learning to write effectively: Current trends in European research (pp. 193 - 197). Emerald Group Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000025055
Niemivirta, M. (1996). Motivational-cognitive components in self-regulated learning [Conference presentation]. 5th International Conference on Motivation, Landau, Germany.
Niemivirta, M. (1999.). Individual differences in motivational and cognitive factors affecting self - regulated learning: A pattern - oriented approach. In P. Nenniger, R. S. Jäger, A. Frey, & M. Wosnitza (Eds.), Advances in motivation. Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
Nikčević-Milković, A. (2007). Cognitive and metacognitive writing processes in students of different educational level. In G. Shiel, I. Stričević, & D. Sabolović-Krajina (Eds.), Literacy without boundaries. In 14th European Conference on Reading (pp. 133 - 137). Croatian Reading Association.
Nikčević-Milković, A. (2012). Samoregulacija učenja u području pisanja [Self-regulation of learning in the field of writing] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Zagreb.
Nikčević-Milković, A. (2014). Pregled kognitivnih i motivacijskih čimbenika pisanja [An overview of cognitive and motivational writing factors]. Psihologijske Teme, 23(2), 189 - 208.
Nikčević-Milković, A. (2015). Istraživanje samoregulacije učenja kod studenata u tri temeljna obrazovna područja: Pisanju, čitanju i matematici [Research of self-regulation of learning in students in three basic educational areas: Writing, Reading and Mathematics]. In Zbornik prispevkov konference EDUvision 2015 ‘'Modern Approaches to Teaching Coming Generation'' (pp. 521 - 537). EDUvision.
Nikčević-Milković, A., & Brala-Mudrovčić, J. (2015). Provjera instruktivne intervencije procesa samoregulacije pisanja i čitanja na kvalitetu pisanih uradaka studenata [Checking the instructive intervention of the process of self-regulation of writing and reading on the quality of students' written works]. In Zbornik prispevkov konference EDUvision 2015.,Modern Approaches to Teaching Coming Generation (pp. 538 - 558). EDUvision.
Nikčević-Milković, A., Jerković, A., & Brala-Mudrovčić, J. (2018). Ispitivanje nekih komponenti samoregulacije učenja u domenama čitanja i pisanja kod učenika različite dobi i roda [Examination of some components of learning self-regulation in the domains of reading and writing in students of different ages and genders]. Napredak, 159, 1-2, 73 - 99.
Nikčević-Milković, A. (2018). Samoregulacija i pisano izražavanje [Self-regulation and written expression]. Suvremena Psihologija, 21(2), 161 - 185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21465/2018-SP-212-03
Nikčević-Milković, A., & Lončarić, D. (2019). Changes in the self-regulation of learning experience after negative self-evaluation of essay writing school task. In V. Petkova, T. Stefanov, & V. Chukov (Eds.), 3leCSHSS: Conference Proceedings (pp. 99-110). Center for Open Access in Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.03
Oxford, R. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 166-172). Cambridge University Press.
Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., & Pelletier, S. T. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 776 - 789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.776
Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Zeinder (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Respondek, L., Seufert, T., Stupnisky, R., & Nett, U. E. (2017). Perceived academic control and academic emotions predict undergraduate university student success: Examining effects on dropout intention and achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 243 - 261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00243
Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Сlassroom practice, time, teachers' beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 640 - 663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000237
Rijavec, M., & Brdar, I. (2002). Coping with school failure and self-regulated learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17(2), 177 - 194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173257
Samanian, S., & Roohani, A. (2018). Effects of self-regulatory strategy development on EFL learners' descriptive writing and reflective thinking. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 6(1), 95 - 116.
Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Factorial and construct validity of a new instrument for the assessment of reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 51, 221-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.134
Sorić, I., & Burić, I. (2010). Skala akademske kontrole [Academic Control Scale]. In I. Tucak Junaković, V. Ćubela Adorić, Z. Penezić, & A. Proroković (Eds.), V. Zbirka psihologijskih skala i upitnika. Sveučilište u Zadru.
Sorić, I. (2014). Samoregulacija učenja [Self-regulation of Learning]. Možemo li naučiti učiti. Naklada Slap.
Tompkins, G. E. (2008). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product. Pearson.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer - A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73 - 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
Vandermeulen, N., Maeyer, S. D., Steendam, E. V., & Lesterhuis, M. (2020). Mapping synthesis writing in various levels of Dutch upper-secondary education: A national baseline study on text quality, writing process and students' perspectives on writing. Pedagogische Studien, 97, 187 - 236.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Wilcox, K., Jeffrey, J., & Gardner-Bixler, A. (2016). Writing to the common core: Teachers' response to changes in standards and assessments for writing in elementary schools. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 903-928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9588-6
Williams, J. D., & Takaku, S. (2011). Help seeking, self-efficacy, and writing performance among college students. Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.1
Copyright (c) 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
