Developing and Piloting a Q-sample on Chinese Language Learners’ Epistemic Beliefs
Abstract
Background. Epistemic beliefs refer to a person’s viewpoints about the nature of knowledge and the process of knowing. A number of studies have explored language learners’ subjective views about what knowing and learning a foreign or a second language (L2) means to them personally. For the most part, these studies adopted quantitative research designs and employed self-reported questionnaires with Likert-type scales to collect the data.
Purpose. This pilot study aimed to assess feasibility of adopting Q-methodology (Q) for explorations of language-related epistemic beliefs held by Chinese university students. A detailed account is given of the development of the research instrument (Q-sample); the findings from the Q-sample piloting are reported.
Methods. The newly-developed Q-sample consisting of 45 statements was tested among six students learning the English language in a university in Mainland China. The students were at a different level of the English language proficiency. The 11-point Q-sorting grid had the values ranging from -5 (“Most disagree”) to +5 (“Most agree”). To gain deeper insights into the students’ personal epistemologies, a semi-structured post Q-sorting interview was conducted with each student.
Results. The newly-developed Q-sample was found suitable for exploring language-related epistemic beliefs. Two groups of students sharing similar beliefs were distinguished. Students who clustered together to form Factor 1 held stronger viewpoints concerning certainty of knowledge; these students were at a lower English language proficiency level. The students who conglomerated on Factor 2 were at a higher level of language proficiency and they held stronger opinions relating to the authority and source of knowledge.
Implications. The findings highlighted the relevance and salience of the epistemic beliefs pertaining to the process of acquiring knowledge. Further research with larger numbers of students is required to explore the role of language proficiency in shaping language learners’ personal epistemologies.
Downloads
References
Albright, E.A., Christofferson, K., McCabe, A., & Montgomery, D. (2019). Lessons learned: Some guidelines to factor interpretation. Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal of Q Methodology, 41, 134-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15133/j.os.2019.001
Banasick, (2019). KADE: A desktop application for Q methodology. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(36), 1360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01360
Barcelos, A. M. F., & Kalaja, P. (2011).Introduction to beliefs about SLA revisited. System, 39(3), 281-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.001
Block, J. (2008). The Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. American Psychological Association.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91-138.
Brown, S.R. (2008). Q methodology. In Lisa M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 699-702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brown, S. R. (2019). Subjectivity in the human sciences. The Psychological Record, 69(4), 565-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00354-5
Caruso, M., & Fraschini, N. (2021). A Q methodology study into vision of Italian L2 university students: An Australian perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 552-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12713
Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2002). Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students' epistemological beliefs: Cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 392-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1102
Damio, S. M. (2018). The analytic process of Q methodology. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 14(1), 59-75. Retrieved from https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/21907/1/AJ_SITI%20MAFTUHAH%20DAMIO%20AJUE%2018.pdf.
Damio, S. M., & Hashim, H. (2014). Conceptions of autonomy in language learning from a cultural perspectives using Q methodology. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1), 33-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v2i1.27
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
Fong, E. T. Y. (2021). English in China: Language, identity and culture. London: Routledge.
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
Irie, K. (2014). Q methodology for post-social-turn research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 13-32. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1134810.pdf.
Irie, K., & Ryan, S. (2015). Study abroad and the dynamics of change in learner L2 self-concept. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Irie, K., Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2018). Using Q methodology to investigate pre-service EFL teachers' mindsets about teaching competences. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 575-598. Retrieved from https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/9444.
Jehng, J. C. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students' epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 23-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1004
Kahsay, M. T. (2019). EFL students' epistemological beliefs and use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in Bahir Dar University.International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 7(26), 69-83. Retrieved from http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_625692_feb95289b803bbd11b87451dd5e7fd6a.pdf.
Lu, X., Zou, X., & Tao, J. (2020). Spanish language teachers' pedagogical beliefs in Chinese universities. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 84, 41-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.71994
Lundberg, A. (2019). Teachers' beliefs about multilingualism: findings from Q method research. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(3), 266-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1495373
Lundberg, A. (2020). Viewpoints about educational language policies: Multilingualism in Sweden and Switzerland. Doctoral dissertation, Malmö universitet. Retrieved from http://mau.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1434537/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
McKeown, B. F., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Mori, Y. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning?. Language Learning, 49(3), 377-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00094
Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2018). Dimensionality in language learners' personal epistemologies.International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 269-282. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1165215.pdf.
Pajares M. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pritchard, D. (2006). What is this thing called knowledge? Routledge: Abingdon.
Ramlo, S. (2020). Divergent viewpoints about the statistical stage of a mixed method: qualitative versus quantitative orientations.International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(1), 93-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1626365
Rock, J. (2013). Exploring vocabulary-related epistemological beliefs with Q-methodology. L'analisi Linquistica E Letteraria, 21(2), 137-154. Retrieved from https://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/index.php/ojs/article/view/282.
Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 551-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01311.x
Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261-275). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2007). The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of.
epistemological beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17, 773-785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.016
Stephenson, W. (1935a). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136(3434), 297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136297b0
Stephenson, W. (1935b). Correlating persons instead of tests. Character and Personality, 4, 17-24.
Stephenson, W. (1936). The foundations of psychometry: Four factor systems. Psychometrika, 1, 195-209.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stephenson, W. (1986a). Protoconcursus: The concourse theory of communication. Operant Subjectivity, 9(2), 37-58.
Stephenson, W. (1986b). Protoconcursus: The concourse theory of communication. Operant Subjectivity, 9(3), 73-96.
Stephenson, W. (1992). Self in everyday life. Operant Subjectivity, 15(2), 29-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15133/j.os.1992.001
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. London, England: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911
Wood, P., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 231-260). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Zheng, Y., Lu, X., & Ren, W. (2019). Profiling Chinese university students' motivation to learn multiple languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(7), 590-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1571074
Copyright (c) 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
