Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback and L2 Learners’ Writing Accuracy: Relationship Between Feedback Type and Learner Belief
Abstract
Background: Feedback provided to learners' writing is a construct of identifying a learner's performance, and it can be identified and trifurcated as grammatical form, location in the text, and pragmatic functions. Second language researchers worldwide consider written corrective feedback (WCF) as a vital and valuable teaching tool that enables learners to improve accuracy in L2 writing.
Purpose: In this context, there exists a plethora of studies that examine the efficacy of WCF on L2 learners’ writing accuracy. However, literature is replete with research that looks into the effectiveness of unfocused WCF on L2 learners’ writing accuracy especially concerning learners’ belief of the feedback type. Not much research is available demonstrating unfocused WCF's efficacy on L2 learners’ writing accuracy.
Methods: Using a quasi-experimental design, three intact classes were recruited and were randomly placed into two experimental groups: indirect corrective feedback, direct corrective feedback, and one control group. The participants completed three narrative writings, one each at pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test.
Results: The results of the study unveiled that the WCF enabled the treatment group learners to produce text with fewer errors than the control group participants. The study also reported no relationship between the learners’ beliefs and the efficacy of WCF, meaning that the preference of learners for a particular type of feedback did not influence the efficacy of WCF.
Conclusion: Based on the results of the case study, important pedagogical implications for ESL/EFL instructors are provided
Downloads
References
Al Harrasi, S. N. M. (2019). The effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving the grammatical accuracy of Omani EFL learners [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sterling].
Al-Rubai'ey, F., & Nassaji, H. (2013). Direct and indirect metalinguistic feedback: A matter of suitability rather than superiority. Issues in TEFL in the Arab World (pp. 28-43). Sultan Qaboos University Press.
Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95-127.
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In A. Barcelos & P. Kalaja (Eds). Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp 7-33). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn043
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016
Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
Chen, S., & Nassaji, H. (2018). Focus on form and corrective feedback research at the University of Victoria, Canada. Language Teaching, 51(2), 278-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481800006X
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners' perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign anguage Education, 1(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y
Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ekiert, M., & di Gennaro, K. (2019). Focused written corrective feedback and linguistic target mastery: Conceptual replication of Bitchener and Knoch (2010). Language Teaching, 54(1), 71-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000120
Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2),97-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. The University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Perspectives on Response. Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
Ferris, D., & Robert, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners' accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006
Ghazal, L., Gul, R. B., Hanzala, M., Jessop, T., & Tharani, A. (2014). Graduate students' perceptions of written feedback at a private university in Pakistan. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p13
Guo, Q., & Barrot, J. S. (2019). Effects of metalinguistic explanation and direct correction on EFL learners' linguistic accuracy. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(3), 261-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1540320
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2015). ESL students perceptions of written corrective feedback: what type of feedback do they prefer and why? The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4(1), 5-26.
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2018). The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students' writing. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 519-539. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168818802469.
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback: A critical synthesis of past and present research. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 28-52.
Khezrlou, S. (2019). Effects of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners' written accuracy and fluency through task repetition. The Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 568-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656765
Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 524-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000247
Lee, I., Luo, N., & Mak, P. (2021). Teachers' attempts at focused written corrective feedback in situ. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100809
Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL Students' affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers' written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p14
Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers' beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
Mujtaba, S. M, Parkash, R., Kaur Mehar Singh, M., & Kamyabi Gol, A. (2022). The effect of computer-mediated feedback on L2 accuracy. Does the difference in learners' perceptual style moderate the effectiveness of the feedback? Computers in the Schools, 39 (2), 99-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2041891
Mujtaba, S. M., Reynolds, B. L., Parkash, R., & Singh, M. K. M. (2021). Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision. Assessing Writing, 50, 100566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100566
Mujtaba, S. M., Parkash, R., & Nawaz, M. W. (2019). Do indirect coded corrective feedback and teachers short affective comments improve the writing performance and learners uptake? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(1), 34-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1616638
Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Nassaji, H. (2016). Research timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 49(1), 35-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000403
Nematzadeh, F., & Siahpoosh, H. (2017). The effect of teacher direct and indirect feedback on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' written performance. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 3(5), 110-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jalll.20170305.02
Orts, S., & Salazar, P. (2016). EFL students' preferences towards written corrective feedback: an exploratory study on age and level of proficiency. The grove-working papers on English studies, 23, 109-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v23.a8
Rahimi, M. (2019). A comparative study of the impact of focused vs.comprehensive corrective feedback and revision on ESL learners' writing accuracy and quality. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 687-710. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168819879182.
Reynolds, B. L., & Kao, C. W. (2021). The effects of digital game-based instruction, teacher instruction, and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 462-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1617747
Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL quarterly, 20(1), 83-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390
Rummel, S., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effectiveness of written corrective feedback and the impact Lao learners' beliefs have on uptake. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 66-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.38.1.04rum
Seker, M., & Dincer, A. (2014). An insight to students' perceptions on teacher feedback in second language writing classes. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 73-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n2p73
Selinker, L. (1972).Interlanguage.International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
Sheen, Y., 2007. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41, 255-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
Sherpa, S. Z. (2021). Effects of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on bhutanese learners' grammatical accuracy over time. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 574-603.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners' explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of second language writing, 22(3), 286-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners' accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1), 103-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12029
Sinha, T. S., & Nassaji, H. (2021). ESL learners' perception and its relationship with the efficacy of written corrective feedback. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 41-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12378
Slack, N., & Norwich, B. (2007). Evaluating the reliability and validity of a learning styles inventory: A classroom-based study. Educational Research, 49(1), 51-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701200765
Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119181
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners' processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case Studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532
Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 285-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
Thomson, K., Watt, A., & Liukkonen, J. (2015). Cognitive style and teaching style influences on the motor skill performance of 11 and 12 year old physical education students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(3), 509-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2015.03077
Tight, D. G. (2010). Perceptual learning style matching and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language learning, 60(4), 792-833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00572.x
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003
Truscott, J. (2020). The efficacy of written corrective feedback: A critique of a meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
Truscott, J., (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369. University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL- International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156(1), 279-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language learning, 62(1), 1-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
Wenden, A. L. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: Beyond the basics. System, 27(4), 435-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00043-3
Zabihi, R., & Erfanitabar, D. (2021). The revision effects of varying degrees of written corrective feedback explicitness on L2 learners' writings. RELC Journal, 00336882211054649. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00336882211054649.
Zhang, T. (2021). The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners' explicit and implicit knowledge development. System, 99, 102493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102493
Copyright (c) 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
