The Container Image Schema as the Conceptual Basis of English Adjectives’ Semantics
Abstract
This paper focuses on the cognitive foundation of the semantics of English adjectives that denote mental and moral characteristics of human beings. Research into these adjectives seems a challenging task because they denote abstract qualities that cannot be perceived through vision, hearing, or touch; and here a question arises: How are abstract qualities interpreted in English encoded through adjectives? To answer it, this study follows the idea of two-level semantics, i.e. word semantics is treated as a two-level phenomenon that comprises the semantic (external) level and the conceptual (deep) one. This study is the first to address adjectival semantics from this perspective. Here a novel approach to revealing the cognitive foundation of adjectives is introduced: given that adjectives originated from old syncretic items and a word cognitive model forms at the moment of word creation, cognitive models underlying adjectives' semantics are unearthed via analysis of their etymological data. Our contribution is two-fold. First, the approach has revealed that the image schema CONTAINER guides semantics of an array of various adjectives independent of their morphemic structure or date of origin. The examples demonstrate that abstract human qualities are interpreted via the following container features: boundary, container substance, size, hardness/softness of a container shell, etc. The semantics of affixed or compound adjectives appear to stem from the integration of concepts represented by an affix and a root or two roots, respectively. Second, the findings show that the value given to every container feature appears to predetermine the evaluation conveyed by an adjective. Container features tend to possess ambivalent value, realizing the positive or negative one due to the interaction with a frame in which the CONTAINER is incorporated, therefore the same polysemantic adjective may develop both positive and negative meanings. To reveal the whole inventory of cognitive models that govern adjectival semantics in English, further research needs to be conducted.
Downloads
References
Abd Rahim, N. (2013). Adjective identification in television advertisements. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 86-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.311
Alessandroni, N., & Rodrigues, C. (2017). Is container a natural and embodied image schema? A developmental, pragmatic, and cultural proposal. Human Development, 60(4), 144-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000478841
Allan, K. (2008). Metaphor and Metonymy: A Diachronic Approach. Wiley-Blackwell.
Baker, M. (2003). Lexical categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge University Press.
Barnhart, R.K., & Steinmetz, S. (Eds.). (1988). The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology. Wilson.
Berg, T. (2019). Adjective phrases with doubly modified heads: How lexical information influences word order and constituent structure. English Language and Linguistics, 23(2), 341-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000430
Bierwisch, M. (1983). Semantische und konzeptuelle Repräsentation lexikalischer Einheiten [Semantics and conceptual representation of lexical items]. In R. Růžička & W. Motsch (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur Semantik (pp. 61-99). Akademie Verlag.
Bierwisch, M., & Lang, E. (1987). Grammatische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjectiven [Grammatical and conceptual aspects of dimensional adjectives] (Vol. 26/27, pp. 1-28). Akademie-Verlag.
Bierwisch, M., & Bosch, P. (1995). Semantic and Conceptual Knowledge. IBM Deutschland.
Boldyrev, N.N. (2016). Cognitive schemas of linguistic interpretation. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki, 4(49), 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2016-4-10-20
Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. University of Chicago Press.
CODEE. (2003). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford University Press.
Cristani, M., Chitó, I., Tomazzoli, C., & Zorzi, M. (2018). A sample algorithm for the lexical classification of comparable adjectives. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 626-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.297
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals. Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D. (2017). The lexicon. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics (pp. 235-255). Wiley.
Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Image-schematic scaffolding in textual and visual artefacts. Journal of Pragmatics, 122, 91-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07013
Dixon, R. M. W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? Mouton Publishers.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2004). Adjective classes in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Adjective classes. A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1-49). Oxford University Press.
Evans, V., & Green M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Gamkrelidze, T. V., & Ivanov, V. V. (1984). Indoevropejskij yazyk i indoevropejcy [The Indo-European language and Indo-Europeans] (Vol. 2). Tbilisi University.
Gans, E. (1981). The Origin of Language: A Formal Theory of Representation. University of California Press.
Givon, T. (1970). Notes on the semantic structure of English adjectives. Language, 46(4), 816-837.
Givon T. (2014). On understanding grammar. Academic Press.
Hampe, B., & Grady, J. E. (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.
Hiramatsu K., Rulf K. E., & Epstein S. (2010). When knowledge causes failure: Children's extension of novel adjectives and the interpretation of one. In Lingua, 120(5), 1209-1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000232
Hurtienne, J. (2017). How cognitive linguistics inspires HCI: Image schemas and image-schematic metaphors. In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1232227
Ioannou, G. (2018). Constructions and image-schema preservation. A historical-comparative analysis of PAY in Greek and English. Lingua, 206, 85-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.02.001
Ivanov, V. V. (1992). Levyj i pravyj [Left and right]. In S.A. Tokarev (Ed.), Mify narodov mira. Encyclopeadia [Myths of the world's nations] (Vol. 2, pp. 43-44). Soviet Encyclopeadia.
Jackendoff, R. (2011). Conceptual Semantics. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Vol. 1, pp. 688-709). Mouton de Gruyter.
Jespersen, O. (1951). The philosophy of grammar. Allen & Unwin.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kacnel'son, S. D. (2001). Kategorii yazyka i myshleniya: Iz nauchnogo naslediya [Language categories and cognition]. Yazyki Slavyanskoj kul'tury.
Klimov, G. A. (1977). Tipologiya yazykov aktivnogo stroya [The typology of active-stative languages]. Nauka.
Kubryakova, E. S. (1999). Semantika v kognitivnoj lingvistike (o koncepte kontejnera i formah ego obektivacii v yazyke) [Semantics from cognitive linguistics perspective (on the concept ‘container' and its language representation)]. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatura i yazyk, 58(5-6), 3-12.
Kubryakova, E. S. (2008). Chasti rechi v onomasiologicheskom osveshchenii [Parts of speech from the onomaseological point of view]. LKI.
Lakoff G. (1970). Pronominalization, negation, and the analysis of adverbs. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 145-165). Wiltham.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Lang, E., & Maienborn, C. (2011). Two-level Semantics: Semantic Form and Conceptual Structure. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Vol. 1, pp. 709-740). Mouton de Gruyter.
LaTerza, I. (2015). Adjectives and determiners. Lingua, 168, 85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.09.007
Martinez, I., Español, S., & Pérez, D. (2018). The interactive origin and the aesthetic modelling of image-schemas and primary metaphors. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(4), 646-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9432-z
Maturana, H.R., & Varela, F.J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambala Publications.
Meletinskij, E. M. (1976). Poetika mifa [The myth poetics]. Nauka.
Merriam-Webster (n.d.). Merriam-Webster dictionary online. An Encyclopeadia Britannica Company. http://www.merriam-webster.com.
Nokolaeva I. (2008). Between nouns and adjectives: A constructional view. Lingua, 118(7), 969-996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.07.003
OED. (1989). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). The Clarendon Press.
Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. Routledge & Kegan.
Podosinov, A. V. (1999). Orientaciya po stranam sveta v arhaicheskih kul'turah Еvrazii [Cardinal direction orientation in archaic cultures]. Yazyki Russkoj kul'tury.
Pokorny, J. (1959). Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch [Indo-Germanic Etymology Dictionary]. http://www.proto-indo-european.ru/dic-pokorny/iew-p.htm.
Porohnickaya, L. V. (2014). Konceptual'nye osnovaniya ehvfemii v yazyke (na materiale anglijskogo, nemeckogo, francuzskogo, ispanskogo i ital'yanskogo yazykov) [The conceptual basis of euphemia in language: Analysis of English, German, French, Spanish and Italian] [Doctoral dissertation]. Moscow State Linguistic University.
Potebnya, A.A. (1968). Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike [Some notes on Russian grammar] (Vol. 3). Prosveshchenie.
Potebnya, A.A. (1926). Thought and Language. State Publishing House.
Pustet R. (2006). Adjectives. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 60-63). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00282-0
Ratkus, A. (2018). This is not the same: The ambiguity of a Gothic adjective. Folia Linguistica Historica, 52(539-2), 475-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2018-0017
Roget, P. M. (1987). The Original Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases. Longman.
Schuchardt-Brevier, H. (1928). Ein Vademecum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft [A vademecum of general linguistics] (2nd ed.). Niemeyer.
Senkbeil, K. (2017). Image schemas across modes and across cultures: Communicating horror in Philip Roth's Nemesis and Ridley Scott's Alien. Language and Literature, 26(4), 323-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017739741
Sosnina, A. (2015). Semantic relations of the adjective ‘empty' in Modern English language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 531-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.017
Trotzke, A., & Wittenberg, E. (2019). Long-standing issues in adjective order and corpus evidence for a multifactorial approach. Linguistics, 57 (2), 273-282. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-4282.
Vaan, de M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Brill.
Vernillo, P. (2019). The role of the image schema in the analysis of the semantic variation of action verbs. Data from IMAGACT. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2347. http://doi.org/urn:nbn:de:0074-2347-1.
Watkins, C. (2000). The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. HMH. http://www.proto-indo-european.ru/dic-watkins/ier-p.htm.
Weekley, E. (1967). An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English (Vol. 2). Dover Publications.
Weicker, M., & Schulz, P. (2019). Red train, big train, broken train: Semantic aspects of adjectives in child language. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 63, 203-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.11wei
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press.
Zhirmunskij, V.M. (1976). Obshchee i germanskoe yazykoznaniev [General and Germanic linguistics]. Nauka.
Zykova I.V. (2018). Synesthesia in the process of phraseologism-formation: A new approach. Yearbook of Phraseology, 9(1), 85-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2018-0006
Copyright (c) 2020 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
