Accuracy Gains from Unfocused Feedback: Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback as Meaningful Pedagogy
Abstract
Background. A primary question among L2 writing instructors is how to best deliver written corrective feedback (WCF) to support student learning. One promising WCF method is Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback, in which instructors provide unfocused/comprehensive feedback using a coding system coupled with regular rounds of editing on short, in-class student-written paragraphs.
Purpose. In this study, I explored the impact on student accuracy of unfocused DWCF on brief student-produced texts in intermediate and advanced developmental ESL writing classes. This study was motivated by the desire to evaluate this pedagogical intervention and determine if it should continue to be implemented in our developmental writing program.
Methods. Utilizing a quasi-experimental research design using t-test analyses, I coded, tallied, and contrasted the errors in term-final paragraphs of 130 students who participated in classes that used DWCF with 79 students in control sections that did not include DWCF.
Results. I found statistically significant improvements in the treatment sections at both levels for nearly all error types (including but not limited to verb form/tense, sentence structure, work order, work choice, determiner, noun form, and punctuation errors; the only error type that did not return significance differences was prepositions at the intermediate level). These results suggest that unfocused written corrective feedback may be effectively used in multilingual writing classrooms, at least given certain parameters to help ensure that feedback is manageable and specific, per the DWCF process.
Conclusion. This study complicates the so-called best practices stemming from WCF research in which many researchers have advocated for WCF that addresses only a small number of error types. Rather, providing that feedback practices are kept manageable and accessible for the students, multilingual students may effectively process and apply unfocused feedback to their own writing.
Downloads
References
Bates, L., Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to ESL compositions. Heinle & Heinle.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
Bitchener, J. (2019). The intersection between SLA and feedback research. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, (2nd ed., pp. 85-105). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.007
Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832400
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016
Bruton, A. (2009). Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were…. System, 37(4), 600-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.005
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 97-113). Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.007
DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275
Eckstein, G., Sims, M., & Rohm, L. (2020). Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback among graduate students: The effects of feedback timing. TESL Canada Journal, 37(2), 78-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1339
Ellis, R., Y. Sheen, M. Murakami & H. Takashima (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., Strong-Krause, D. (2011) The efficacy of dynamic written corrective feedback for university-matriculated ESL learners. System, 39, 229-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.04.012
Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R., Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in L2 writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14, 445-463.
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
Ferris, D. R. & Kurzer, K. (2019). Does error feedback help L2 writers? Latest evidence on the efficacy of written corrective feedback. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd Ed., pp. 106-124). Cambridge University Press.
Ferris D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
Foin, A. T., & Lange, E. J. (2007). Generation 1.5 writers' success in correcting errors marked on an our-of-class paper. The CATESOL Journal, 19(1), 146-163.
Han Y. & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary ESL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2012). The differential effects of comprehensive corrective feedback on L2 writing accuracy. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 3, 16-46.
Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2015). The effects of dynamic written corrective feedback: A 30 week study. Journal of Response to Writing, 1(2), 6-34.
Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D., Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781
Hyland, K. & F. Hyland (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Pergamon.
Kurzer, K. (in print). Dynamic written corrective feedback. In H. Mohebbi (Ed.) Insights into teaching and learning writing: A practical guide for early-career teachers. Castledown Publishers.
Kurzer, K. (2021). More than just grammar deficiencies: Moving faculty in the disciplines toward a difference-as-resource pedagogical paradigm. In E. Lee, N. Fahim, J. Johnson, and B. R. Schreiber (Eds.), Building a more linguistically just campus: Theory, pedagogy, and advocacy (pp. 198-213). Multilingual Matters.
Kurzer, K. (2019). Dynamic written corrective feedback in a community college ESL writing class setting. In S. M. Anwaruddin (Ed.) Knowledge mobilization in TESOL: Connecting research and practice (pp. 59-75). Brill.
Kurzer, K. (2018b). Student perceptions of dynamic written corrective feedback in developmental multilingual writing classes. Journal of Response to Writing, 4(2), 34-68.
Kurzer, K. (2018a). Dynamic written corrective feedback in developmental ESL writing classes. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 5-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.366
Lalande, J.F. II (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal 66.2, 140-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x
Lane, J., & Lange, E. (2012). Writing clearly: Grammar for editing (3rd ed.). Heinle Cengage Learning.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp043
Lee I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 classroom: what do students think? TESL Canada Journal 22, 1-16. http://dx/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Loza, S. (in print). Oral corrective feedback in the Spanish heritage language context. In S. Loza & S. M. Beaudrie (Eds.), Heritage language teaching: Critical language awareness perspectives for research and pedagogy. Routledge.
Marzban, A., & Arabahmadi, S. (2013). The effect of written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL students' writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1000-1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.186
Messenger, R. A., Evans, N. W., & Hartshorn, K. J. (2020). Managing Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of Response to Writing, 6(1), 5.
Polio, C., & Shea, M. C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.003
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language.
Learning, 46(2), 327-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
Vygotsky, L. (1978).Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.11
Wigglesworth, G. (2008). Measuring accuracy in second language performance. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), New York.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawaii at Maona.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Xu, C. (2009). Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 270-275.
Copyright (c) 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
