On the Relationship of Iranian EFL Learners’ Engagement and Self-regulation with Their Learning Outcomes

  • Yahya Ghelichli Department of English Language Teaching, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4659-9672
  • Seyyed Hassan Seyyedrezaei Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
  • Zari Sadat Seyyedrezaei Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-3214
Keywords: self-regulation, student engagement, learning outcomes, EFL learners, language learning

Abstract

Background. Language learning is a long and tedious process and some students may lose their initial interest, so their learning achievement might in turn decrease. Student engagement and self-regulation can be seen as influential in helping them to restore their enthusiasm and motivation. Engagement can assist students to be actively involved in their school work in order to become more motivated and interested in language learning. Further, self-regulation also seems to contribute to have students regulate their learning behavior and engagement, which could possibly play a role in their learning outcomes.

Purpose. The purpose of this study was thus to investigate the relationships of self-regulation and student engagement with learning outcomes.

Method. The participants, selected through convenience sampling, included 146 language learners learning English at the Iran Language Institute (ILI) Gorgan, Iran. They were given two questionnaires and a language proficiency test.

Results. The obtained data were analyzed by using SPSS, version 26. The results of Spearman’s rho correlation tests indicated that there were statistically significant relationships of self-regulation and student engagement with learning outcomes, with student engagement having a stronger association with learning outcomes. Moreover, student engagement as a global construct was a better predictor of learning outcomes.

Conclusion. Since student engagement is comparatively new in the realm of language education, the findings can contribute to our understanding of its role in learning outcomes. Besides, the results have pedagogical implications for language learners and language teachers alike.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002

Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. The Guilford Press.

Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8

Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488). Cambridge University Press.

Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Self-regulation: An introductory overview. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 1-9). Academic Press.

Choi, Y., Zhang, D., Lin, C. H., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Self-regulated learning of vocabulary in English as a foreign language. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 20(1), 54-82.

Cirica, M., & Jovanovicb, D. (2016). Student engagement as a multidimensional concept. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 187-194). Future Academy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.09.24

Coelho, V., Cadima, J., Pinto, A. I., & Guimarães, C. (2018). Self-regulation, engagement, and developmental functioning in preschool-aged children. Journal of Early Intervention, 41(2),1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118810238

Collaço, C. M. (2017). Increasing student engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(4), 40-47.

Commissiong, M. A. (2020). Student engagement, self-regulation, satisfaction, and success in online learning environments [Doctoral dissertation]. Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=٩٧٩٤&context=dissertations.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. The University of Rochester Press.

Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). Continuum.

Dornyei, Z. (2018). Engaging language learners. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hg2016BSbpVgVU&t=2328s.

Ellis, J. M., & Helaire, L. J. (2018). The effects of adolescent self-regulated learning on engagement in a college access program: An exploratory study. AERA Open, 4(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418756051

Filice, S., Tregunno, D., Edge, D., & Egan, R. (2020). Re-imaging clinical education: The interdependence of the self-regulated clinical teacher and nursing student.International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 17(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2019-0056

Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer.

Fong, C. J., Davis, C. W., Kim, Y., Kim, Y. W., Marriott, L., & Kim, S. (2017). Psychosocial factors and community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 388-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653479

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Ghelichli, Y., Seyyedrezaei, S., Barani, G., Mazandarani, O. (2020). The relationship between dimensions of student engagement and language learning motivation among Iranian EFL learners.International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 8(31), 43-57.

Hart, S. R., Stewart, K., & Jimerson, S. R. (2011). The student engagement in schools questionnaire (SESQ) and the teacher engagement report form-new (TERF-N): Examining the preliminary evidence. Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly The California School Psychologist, 15(1), 67-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340964

Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289

Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Ready to learn? Children's pre-academic achievement in pre- kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 27-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.002

Khajavy, M. H. (2021). Modeling the relations between foreign language engagement, emotions, grit and reading achievement. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al- Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 241-259). Multilingual Matters.

LeMay, J. O. IV (2017). Academic engagement, motivation, self-regulation, and achievement of Georgia southern university sophomore students [Doctoral dissertation]. Georgia Southern University. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1666.

Lunsford, S. F. (2020). Clinical grading rubric and interrater reliability [Master's thesis]. Gardner-Webb University]. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/nursing-msn/8.

Mello, L. V. (2016). Fostering postgraduate student engagement: Online resources supporting self-directed learning in a diverse cohort. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29366

Menken, K. (2010). NCLB and English language learners: Challenges and consequences. Theory into Practice, 49(2), 121-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841003626619

Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 643-660). Springer.

Moyer, A. (2014). Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 418-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu012

Nichols, S. L., & Dawson, H. S. (2012). Assessment as a context for student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 457-477). Springer.

Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., & Nakata, Y. (2017). Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System, 65, 151-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.01.011

Park, S., & Kim, N. H. (2022). University students' self-regulation, engagement and performance in flipped learning. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 22-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-08-2020-0129

Pahuriray, V. G. M. (2021). Self-regulating capacity in language learning and English academic achievement. Globus Journal of Progressive Education, 11(2), 82-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46360/globus.edu.220212012

Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life.Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048

Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365-386). Springer.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024

Rahal, A., & Zainuba, M. (2016). Improving students' performance in quantitative courses: The case of academic motivation and predictive analytics.International Journal of Management Education (Elsevier Science), 14(1), 8-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.11.003

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). Springer.

Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924

Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840

Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer.

Taurina, Z. (2015). Students' motivation and learning outcomes: Significant factors in internal study quality assurance system. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 5(4), 2625-2630.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Higher Education Academy.

Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2009). Autonomy in language learning: Do students take responsibility for their learning? Journal of Theory & Practice in Education, 5(2), 148-169.

Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0090

Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Academic Press.

Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 635-651). Springer.

Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3

Zhang, S., Shi, R., Yun, L., Li, X., Wang, Y., He, H., & Miao, D. (2015). Self-regulation and study-related health outcomes: A structural equation model of regulatory mode orientations, academic burnout and engagement among university students. Social Indicators Research, 123(2), 585-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0742-3

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014).Comparing students' self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.004

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez -Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831202300461

Published
2023-06-30
How to Cite
GhelichliY., SeyyedrezaeiS. H., & SeyyedrezaeiZ. S. (2023). On the Relationship of Iranian EFL Learners’ Engagement and Self-regulation with Their Learning Outcomes. Journal of Language and Education, 9(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.12741