Эффективность объяснения лексики для улучшения словарного запаса и навыков письма изучающих английский язык как неродной

Ключевые слова: пополнение словарного запаса, знание лексики, родственные слова в контексте, словарный запас, объяснение в обучении лексике

Аннотация

Считается, что объем словарного запаса тесно связан с языковыми навыками учащихся, пониманием прочитанного, приобретением знаний и академической успеваемостью. В Малайзии недостаточность словарного запаса была признана одной из причин неспособности учащихся овладеть иностранным языком. В данном полуэкспериментальном исследовании изучалось влияние применения модели контекстуализированных родственных слов (КРС) для прямого обучения лексике на объем словарного запаса и навыков письма среди учащихся средней школы с учетом трех уровней владения языком. Методом целевой выборки было отобрано 143 учащихся 8 класса, которые были разделены на три группы по уровню владения языком и которым была предложена одинаковая схема родственных слов в контексте. Для измерения объема словарного запаса участников использовался тест на определение уровня активного словарного запаса. Для подсчета баллов до и после тестирования использовались контрольные задания по написанию эссе. Результаты показали положительный эффект от использования модели КРС на расширение словарного запаса и развитие навыков письма у студентов. После десятинедельного курса большинство студентов из групп с низким, средним и высоким уровнем владения языком смогли увеличить свой словарный запас с менее чем 1000 слов до 1000-2000 слов. Также во всех трех группах увеличилось количество студентов, которые смогли достичь уровня словарного запаса в 2000 слов. Результаты данного исследования подтвердили положительный эффект от использования модели КРС для увеличения не только объема словарного запаса, но и навыков письма у студентов с высоким и средним уровнем владения языком. В тестах по письму студенты с высоким уровнем владения языком показали значительный прогресс, в то время как у студентов со средним уровнем владения языком результаты тестов по письму увеличились незначительно, но это было несущественно. Удивительно, но после курса обучения у студентов с низким уровнем знаний значительно снизились результаты письменного теста, несмотря на увеличение словарного запаса. В будущих исследованиях рекомендуется применять подлинно экспериментальный метод с более длительным периодом обучения, особенно для изучения эффективности модели в отношении навыков письма у учащихся.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.

Биографии авторов

Фрэнки Субон, Университет менеджмента и науки

Senior Lecturer, School of Education and Social Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Норсеха Унин, Университет Технологи Мара

Senior Lecturer, Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sarawak, 94300 Kota

Литература

Adolps, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.425

Albrechtsen, D., Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (2008). Vocabulary and writing in a first and second language: Processes and development. Palgrave Macmillan.

Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. Continuum.

Al-Khasawneh, F. (2019). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on the reading comprehension of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 24-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8822

Asgari A., & Mustapha, G. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies of Malaysian ESL students. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanity, 20(3), 751-764.

Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 84-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p84

August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English Language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120.x

Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6, 1-27.

Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1985). Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives, 23(1), 11-15.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life; Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.

Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In A. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Ed.)., Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223-242). Erlbaum.

Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (2005). Vocabulary essentials: From research to practice for improved instruction. Scott Foresman and Co.

Chua, Y. P. (2013). Mastering research statistics. McGraw-Hill Education.

Chung, S. F. (2012). Research-based vocabulary instruction for English language learners. The Reading Matrix, 12(2), 105-120.

Cohen, A. D. (1988). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longman.

Coyne, M., McCoach, B., Loftus, D., Zipoli, S., Ruby, R., Crevecoerut, Y., & Kapp, S. (2010). Direct and extended vocabulary instruction in kindergarten: Investigating transfer effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 93-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345741003592410

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997) Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability ten years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.934

Danilović Jeremić, J. (2015). Lexical knowledge of Serbian L1 English L2 learners: Reception vs. production. Nastava i vaspitanje, 64(1), 87-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas1501087D

Duin, A.H., & Graves, M. F. (1987). Intensive vocabulary instruction as a prewriting technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 311-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/747971

Durkin, D. (1979). What classroom observation reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-538.

Dutro, S., & Moran, C. (2003). Rethinking English language instruction: An architectural approach. In G. Garcia (Ed.), English learners: Reaching the highest level of English literacy (pp. 227-258). International Reading Association.

Frayer, D. A., Frederick, W. C., & Kalausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of concept mastery. Technical Report No. 16. University of Winconsin Research and Development Centre for Cognitive Learning.

Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). Effective instruction for English-language learners: What we know about effective instructional practices for English language learners. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 454-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600402

Ghapanchi, Z., Eskandari, Z., & Tabasi, E. (2012). The effect of text-based direct vocabulary instruction on vocabulary acquisition. World Journal of English Language, 2(1), 74-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v2n1p74

Graves, M. F. (2000). A vocabulary programme to compliment and bolster a middle grade comprehension programme. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp.116-135). International Reading Association.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (1990). Second language writing: Assessment issues. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 69-87). Cambridge University Press.

Haris, M., & Yunus, M. M. (2018). Vocabulary size of ESL IGCSE students. International Journal of Advance Research, 6(8), 263-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7518

Hestad, L. C. (2014). The impact of vocabulary instruction on writing fluency [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3633490).

Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (1998). Current Research and Practice in Teaching Vocabulary. Japan Association for Language Teaching, 22(1), 7-11.

Hutton, T. L. (2008). Three tiers of vocabulary and education. https://www.superduperinc.com/handouts/pdf/182_v.

İlter, I. (2017). Teaching word meanings to students at different reading ability: A controlled assessment of the contextual-based vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension. Education and Science, 42(190), 437-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6482

İlter, İ. (2018). Effects of the instruction in inferring meanings from context on the comprehension of middle school students at frustration reading level. Journal of Education, 198(3), 225-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057418818818

Jacobs, H., Zingraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V.F., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing ESL composition: Apractical approach. Newbury House Publishers.

Kaur, N. Othman, N. H., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2012). Lexical competence among tertiary students: Teacher-student perspectives. The English Teacher, 37, 90-104.

Kaur, N., & Kabilan, M. K. (2007). Autonomy in ESL: To what extent? Paper presented at Literary Conference (LITCON) 2007, Penang, Malaysia.

Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. e joint (Ed.). Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126-132). Macmillan.

Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x

Laufer, B., & Sim, D. D. (1985). Measuring and explaining the reading threshold needed for English for academic purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals, 18(5), 405-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1985.tb00973.x

Mast, D. W. (2011) Using semantic maps and word families in the beginning-level middle school foreign language classroom. A Journal for K - 16+ Foreign Language Educators, 68(1), 63-70.

Mckeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2011). Making vocabulary interventions engaging and effective. In R. E. O'Connor, & P. F. Vadasy, (Ed.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 138-168). New York: Guilford Press.

McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Pople, M. T. (1985). Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words. Reading research Quarterly, 20, 522-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/747940

Moore, D. W. (2010). Direct Instruction: Targeted strategies for student success. http://www.insideng.com/profdev/guides/Moore_Instruction.pdf.

Nadarajan, S. (2009). The effect of instruction and context on L2 learners' vocabulary development. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(2), 177-189.

Naeimi, M., & Foo, T. C. V. (2015). Vocabulary Acquisition through Direct and Indirect Learning Strategies. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 142-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n10p142

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in another Language. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6-9). Cambridge University Press.

National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Nemati, A. (2010). Proficiency and size of receptive vocabulary: Comparing EFL and ESL environments. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(1), 46-53.

Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Ed.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp.174-200). Cambridge University Press.

Qian, D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193

Raasch, K. (2018). The Effects of Purposeful Vocabulary Instruction. https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/274.

Scarcella, R. C. (1996). Secondary education in California and second language research: Instructing ESL students in the 1990's. The CATESOL Journal, 9, 129-152.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2007). Currentperspectivesonvocabulary teaching and learning. In J. Cummins, & C. Davison (Eds.), International Handbooks of English Language Teaching (pp. 827-839). Springer.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Teaching vocabulary. White Ppains. Pearson Education.

Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 145-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588328

Scott, J. A., & Nagy, W. E. (1997). Understanding the definitions of unfamiliar words. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 184-200.

Sedita, J. (2005). Effective Vocabulary Instruction. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 2(1) 33-45.

Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (2008). Second language research methods. Oxford University Press.

Senechel, M., Oulette, G., & Rodney, D. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. In D. K. Dickinson, & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 173-182). Guilford.

Shostak, J. (2002) The value of direct and systematic vocabulary instruction. Professional development series, 7, 1-11.

Silsüpür, B. (2017). Does using language games affect vocabulary learning in EFL Classes? Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 2(1), 83-104.

Solati-Dehkordi, S. A., & Salehi, H. (2016). Impact of explicit vocabulary instruction on writing achievement of upper-intermediate EFL learners. International Education Studies, 9(4), 141-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p141

Soureshjani, K. H. (2011). The effects of contextualizing and decontextualizing techniques on lexical-oriented knowledge of Persian EFL language learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 547-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.5.547-552

Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001072

Stone, B., & Urquhart, V. (2008). Remove limits to learning with systematic vocabulary instruction. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544614.pdf.

Subon, F. (2016). Direct vocabulary instruction: The effects of contextualised word families on learners' vocabulary acquisition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 284-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.461

Subon, F. (2018). The contextualized word family model of direct vocabulary instruction. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 23, 57-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2303035770

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Pearson Education Limited.

Tosuncuoğlu, İ. (2015). Teaching vocabulary through Sentences. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 4(4), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v4i4.501

Tschirner, E. (2004). Breadth of vocabulary and advanced English study: An empirical investigation. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 27-39.

Waring, R. (2002). Why should we build up a start-up vocabulary quickly? http://www1.harenet.ne.jp/~waring/vocab/principles/early.htm.

Xie, R.,Zhang, J.,Wu, X., & Nguyen, T. P. (2019). The relationship between morphological awareness and reading comprehension among Chinese children. Frontiers Psychology, 10, 1-13. https//. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00054

Yonek, L. M. (2008). The effects of rich vocabulary instruction on students' expository writing [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh. https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/9995/1/yoneklisa122008.pdf.

Zakaria, Z. (2005). Dictionary as tool in vocabulary acquisition for rural students [Unpublished master's dissertation], Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Zimmerman, K. (2005). Newly placed versus continuing students: Comparing vocabulary size. ESL Reporter, 38(1), 52-60.

Опубликован
2021-03-31
Как цитировать
SubonF., & UninN. (2021). Эффективность объяснения лексики для улучшения словарного запаса и навыков письма изучающих английский язык как неродной. Journal of Language and Education, 7(1), 190-205. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10209
Раздел
Оригинальное исследование