«Публикуйся и преуспей» вместо «Публикуйся или умри»: мотивационная модель для подготовки высококачественные публикации
Аннотация
Принцип "публикуйся или умри" практикуется по всему миру, однако многие авторы считают, что он является демотиватором и в целом вреден. В этой статье мы попытались помочь преодолеть растущее давление негативной мотивации на исследователей. Цель работы - предложить модель факторов, мотивирующих исследователей публиковаться в журналах WoS/Scopus, основанную в основном на положительной мотивации и сочетании концепций, включающих теории контроля, управления, заинтересованных сторон и психологии. Модель предназначалась для болгарских университетов. Она охватывает 17 мотивационных факторов и 29 потенциальных характеристик заинтересованных сторон университетов, непосредственно вовлеченных в тему. Ранжирование факторов в модель включено не было. Методология исследования охватывала методы экспертной оценки, анализа/синтеза, индукции/дедукции, а инструментарий состоял из комплексного опроса и рангового коэффициента конкордации Кендалла. Модель была внедрена в одном из болгарских государственных университетов. В эмпирическом исследовании приняли участие 120 исследователей. Это привело к ранжированию факторов среди заинтересованных сторон внутри университета. Самым высоко оцениваемым мотивационным фактором была репутация, а наиболее низко оцениваемым - снижение давления принципа "публикуйся или умри". Наиболее приоритетными потенциальными характеристиками были престиж и возможности университета, а также поддержка в продвижении по работе. Мы считаем, что данная модель вносит вклад в теорию контроля поведения. Модель также улучшит управление университетскими исследованиями, обогатив его инструментарий.
Скачивания
Литература
Alfonso, A. G. (2019). Exogenous factors, implicit theories and linguistic-discursive procedures in scientific writing. Enunciacion, 24(2), 184-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/22486798.15199
Banks, D. (2018). Thoughts on publishing the research article over the Centuries. Publications, 6(1), Article 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6010010
Barreto, I. B., Roa, E. R. A., & Velasquez, T. D. M. (2019). Scientific production of teachers in Peruvian Universities: motivations and perceptions. Revista San Gregorio 35, 86-96.
Beavitt, T. A., & Popova, N. G. (2020). The role of the English article system in developing dialogical context: A view from Russian science. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 52-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10360
Bedeian, A. G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312
Behl, A., Chavan, M., Dutta, P., & Sheorey, P. A. (2020). Benchmarking publication metrics for Indian business researchers. Exploring the role of collaboration. Benchmarking-an International Journal, 27(2), 571-591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-04-2019-0184
Binswanger, M. (2015). How nonsense became excellence: Forcing professors to publish. In Incentives and performance: Governance of research organizations (pp. 19-32). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_2
Blaginin, V., Volkova, M., & Strielkowski, W. (2019). Measuring academic leadership using research performance. In W. Strielkowski (Ed.), Sustainable leadership for entrepreneurs and academics, Esal2018 (pp. 355-362). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15495-0_37
Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. T. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510597680
Cizmas, E., Feder, E.-S., Maticiuc, M.-D., & Vlad-Anghel, S. (2020). Team management, diversity, and performance as key influencing factors of organizational sustainable performance. Sustainability, 12(18), 7414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187414
Daumiller, M., & Dresel, M. (2020). Researchers’ achievement goals: Prevalence, structure, and associations with job burnout/engagement and professional learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101843
Daumiller, M., Siegel, S., & Dresel, M. (2019). Construction and validation of a short multidisciplinary research performance questionnaire (SMRPQ). Research Evaluation, 28(3), 241–252, 10.1093/reseval/ rvz009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz009
David, S. T., Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. (1951). Some questions of distribution in the theory of rank correlation. Biometrika, 38(1-2), 131-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.131
Dornyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dornyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Freeman, R. E. (2015). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Ghinea, V., Mihaylova, L., & Papazov, E. (2015). Organizational culture dynamics: Complex systems dynamics. Quality - Access to Success, 16(141), 99-105.
Hamner, C., Luthans, F., & Krietner, R. (2015). Operant behavior and organizational behavior modification. In Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership (pp. 114-133). Taylor and Francis.
Hung. B. P., & Baranovskaya, T. A. (2020). Second language teaching and teacher education in diverse contexts. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 4-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.11455
Johnston, A. (2016). Motivation and the academic - where the drivers sit. Journal of Management Development, 35(6), 765-777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-09-2015-0140
Karimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F. (2020). Applied linguistics researchers’ possible selves as motivational resources guiding their research productivity. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 25(2), 214-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1742994
Kirova, M. (2010). Effective combination of the performance characteristics of the innovations. In The Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference Business and Management (vol. 1-2, pp. 399-406). VGTU. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2010.054
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
Lambovska, M., & Yordanov, K. (2020). Motivation of researchers to publish in high-quality journals: A theoretical framework. TEM Journal, 9(1), 188-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/tem91-27
Luthans, F., Luthans, B. C., & Luthans, K. W. (Eds.). (2015). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (13th. ed.). Information Age Publishing.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954
Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(4-5), 422-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751
Ministry of Education and Science of the R Bulgaria [MES RB]. (2018). Rules for monitoring and evaluation of the research activity of scientific organizations, the research fund and higher schools [Act]. http://www.mon. bg.pravilnik_ocenka-NIDejnost_290618.
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Bulgaria [MES RB]. (2010). Bulgarian University Ranking System. https://rsvu.mon.bg/rsvu4/#/.
Murray, H. A. (1936). Basic concepts for a psychology of personality. Journal of General Psychology, 15(2), 241-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1936.9917922
Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2014). Academic rankings between the “republic of science” and “new public management”. In A. Lanteri, & J. Vromen (Eds.), Economics of economists: Institutional setting, individual incentives, and future prospects (pp. 77-103). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139059145.005
Raitskaya, L., & Tikhonova, E. (2020a). Overcoming cultural barriers to scholarly communication in international peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Language and Education, 6(2), 4-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.11043
Raitskaya, L., & Tikhonova, E. (2020b). Pressure to publish internationally: Scholarly writing coming to the fore. Journal of Language and Education, 6(1), 4-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10631
Raitskaya, L., & Tikhonova, E. (2020c). Seven deadly sins: Culture’s effect on scholarly editing and publishing. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 167-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.11205
Richard, J. E., Plimmer, G., Fam, K. S., & Campbell, C. (2015). Publishing success of marketing academics: Antecedents and outcomes. European Journal of Marketing, 49(1-2), 123-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-06-2013-0311
Romani-Dias, M., Carneiro, J., & Barbosa, A. D. (2019). Internationalization of higher education institutions: The underestimated role of faculty. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(2), 300-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-07-2017-0184
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Simeonov, O. (1997). Theoretical issues of control. Akadem Consult.
Sink, D. S. (1985). Productivity management: Planning, measurement and evaluation, control and improvement. Wiley.
Sink, D. S. (1986). Performance and productivity-measurement - The art of developing creative scoreboards. Industrial Engineering, 18(1), 86-90.
Stoyanov, I. (2012). Power and behaviour of the human factor in management. Dialog E-journal, 3, 23-55.
Stoyanov, I. (2014). Expectations, attitudes and behavior of the human factor in the organizational environment. KSI Transactions on KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 7(1), 45-49.
Turan, F. K., Cetinkaya, S., & Ustun, C. (2016). A methodological framework to analyze stakeholder preferences and propose strategic pathways for a sustainable university. Higher Education, 72(6), 743-760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9973-8
Vogel, R., & Hattke, F. (2018). How is the use of performance information related to performance of public sector professionals? Evidence from the field of academic research. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 390-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400986
Vorontsova, A., Shvindina, H., Mayboroda, T., Mishenina, H. & Heiets, I. (2020). The impact of state regulation in a sphere of education on sustainable development of national economy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 275-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.23
Vroom, V. H. (1985). Citation Classic - Work and Motivation. Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, 27, 20-20.
Yordanov, K. (1997). Control as state power. Economic Archive, 1, 31-38.
Yordanov, K. (1999). Control on public finances. Economic Archive, 1, 36-41
Copyright (c) 2021 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Авторы, публикующие статьи в журнале, соглашаются с условиями политики авторских прав.
