Analysis of CLIL-Related Research in School Settings: A Systematic Review
Аннотация
Background: Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is an emerging approach in the global educational landscape, and as such, there is a lack of a systematic review of this field.
Purpose: To explore CLIL-related scientific publications in school settings around the world.
Method: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines in WoS and Scopus databases. A total of 142 articles published in the period 2018-2022 were analysed according to three types of variables: extrinsic to the scientific process, methodological, and content based. The results of the methodological and content-based variables were contrasted with the portfolio of CLIL evaluation measures and analysed through the lens of the 4Cs framework.
Results: The findings revealed that CLIL studies were performed in a wide range of countries across continents. It was the secondary school which drew most scientific interest. Apropos of the methodological variable, there was a balance between qualitative and quantitative studies, and a questionмnaire as a tool was favoured by the researchers. The major scientific interest lay in the communication principle, while cognition was understudied.
Conclusions: There was a growing scientific interest in CLIL. Although the major interest laid in linguistic gains, other fields of research transpired. The conclusions provide further agenda for CLIL research.
Скачивания
Литература
Antropova, S., & Poveda García-Noblejas, B. (2023), Database: The worldwide expansion of CLIL in school settings. Mendeley Data, V1,
Basterrechea, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2020). Language-related episodes and pair dynamics in primary school CLIL learners: A comparison between proficiency-matched and student-selected pairs. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 423–447.
Bauer-Marschallinger, S., Dalton-Puffer, C., Heaney, H., Katzinger, L., & Smit, U. (2021). CLIL for all? An exploratory study of reported pedagogical practices in Austrian secondary schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–16.
Bower, K. (2019a). Explaining motivation in language learning: A framework for evaluation and research. The Language Learning Journal, 47(5), 558–574.
Bower, K. (2019b). ‘Speaking French alive’: Learner perspectives on their motivation in Content and Language Integrated Learning in England. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 45–60.
Bower, K. (2020). School leaders’ perspectives on content and language integrated learning in England. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(4), 351–367.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. (2012). Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness – relationships, comparisons and contrasts. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 5–13.
Campillo-Ferrer, J.-M., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2022). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of the level of development of low-order cognitive skills under the Content and Language Integrated Learning Approach. Frontiers in Education, 7.
Castellano-Risco, I., Alejo-González, R., & Piquer-Píriz, A. M. (2020). The development of receptive vocabulary in CLIL vs EFL: Is the learning context the main variable? System, 91, 102263.
Çelik, F., & Yangın Ersanlı, C. (2022). The use of augmented reality in a gamified CLIL lesson and students’ achievements and attitudes: a quasi-experimental study. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 9–30.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262.
Cimermanová, I. (2021). A review of European research on Content and Language Integrated Learning. Integration of Education, 25(2), 192–213.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., & Llinares, A. (2022). CLIL in the 21st century. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 182–206.
Díaz Herrera, C. (2018). Qualitative research and thematic content analysis. Intellectual orientation of Universum journal. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 28(1).
Dvorjaninova, A., & Alas, E. (2018). Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Estonia: Subject and language teacher perspective. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 14, 41–57.
EF English First. (2018). The world’s largest ranking of countries and regions by English skills.
Eurydice Report. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at school in Europe (Y. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education Sport and Culture, Ed.). Publications Office.
Fernández-Barrera, A. (2019). Doing CLIL in the Science classroom: A critical sociolinguistic ethnography in La Mancha secondary schools. Foro de Educación, 17(27), 37–63.
Gil-López, V., González-Víllora, S., & Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. (2021). Learning foreign languages through content and language integrated learning in physical education: A systematic review. Porta Linguarum, 35, 165–182.
Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe: A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal, 18(6), 675–698.
Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S., & Dixon, L. Q. (2018). Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–38.
Hernandez-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill.
Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Shashken, A. (2021). Exploring the potential of CLIL in Kazakhstan: A qualitative study. Revista Complutense de Educación, 32(2), 261–271.
Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284.
Jakonen, T. (2019). The integration of content and language in students’ task answer production in the bilingual classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(4), 428–444.
Kovacikova, E. (2019). Development of speaking at primary schools through CLIL. XLinguae, 12(2), 17–26.
Li, L., Huang, F., Chen, S., Pan, L., Zeng, W., & Wu, X. (2020). Exploring the curriculum development in content and language integrated learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 1102–1113.
Linares, A., & Morton, T. (Eds.). (2017). Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (vol. 47). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ljalikova, A., Meristo, M., Alas, E., & Jung, M. (2021). Narrative analysis as a means of investigating CLIL teachers’ meaningful experiences. Qualitative Research in Education, 10(3), 228–259.
Lockwood, C., & Tricco, A. C. (2020). Preparing scoping reviews for publication using methodological guides and reporting standards. Nursing & Health Sciences, 22(1), 1–4.
Lorenzo, F., & Granados, A. (2020). One generation after the bilingual turn: Results from a large-scale CLIL teachers’ survey. Elia, 20, 77–111.
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE- The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. European Commission.
Martínez Agudo, J. de D., & Fielden Burns, L. V. (2021). What key stakeholders think about CLIL programmes: Commonalities and differences of perspective. Porta Linguarum, 35, 221–237.
McDougald, J. S., & Pissarello, D. (2020). Content and Language Integrated Learning: In-service teachers’ knowledge and perceptions before and after a professional development program. Íkala, 25(2), 353–372.
Mearns, T., & Graaff, R. de. (2018). Bilingual education and CLIL in the Netherlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 122–128.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan Publishers.
Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). The effect of content and language integrated learning programmes’ intensity on English proficiency: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 18–30.
Molina-Azorin, J. F., & Fetters, M. D. (2019). Building a better world through mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 275–281.
Morilla García, C., & Pavón Vázquez, V. (2018). Psychopedagogical factors that affect L2 listening acquisition in diverse Spanish bilingual and non-bilingual instructional settings: Multiple intelligences influence. Journal of English Studies, 16, 185.
Nieto, E. (2020). Mother tongue development in bilingual programs type CLIL in secondary school: A comparative study on written production. RLA. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 58(2), 117–136.
Nieto Moreno de Diezmas, E. (2018). Acquisition of reading comprehension in L1 in bilingual programmes of primary education. A comparative study. Ocnos, 17(1), 43–54.
Nieto Moreno de Diezmas, E. (2019). Students, teachers and management teams in bilingual programmes: Shared perceptions and areas for improvement. Journal of English Studies, 17, 277.
Nikula, T., & Moore, P. (2019). Exploring translanguaging in CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 237–249.
Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Gómez-Parra, M. E. (2021). Foreign and bilingual language education in the UK and Spain: A study of similarities and differences. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 243–255.
Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2019). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: Tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 593–613.
Pfenninger, S. E. (2020). The dynamic multicausality of age of first bilingual language exposure: Evidence from a longitudinal Content and Language Integrated learning study with dense time serial measurements. The Modern Language Journal, 104(3), 662–686.
Roiha, A. (2019). Investigating former pupils’ experiences and perceptions of CLIL in Finland: A retrospective analysis. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 5(2), 92–103.
Ruiz Cordero, M. B. (2019). Assessing English writing skills of students from bilingual and non-bilingual schools in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. A comparative study. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 95–113.
Ruiz Cordero, M. B. (2022). The oral skill English level in bilingual and non-bilingual educational centres of Castilla-La Mancha. Revista Complutense de Educación, 33(2), 201–213.
Siepmann, P., Rumlich, D., Matz, F., & Römhild, R. (2021). Attention to diversity in German CLIL classrooms: Multi-perspective research on students’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
Stimson, R. (2014). Handbook of research methods and applications in spatially integrated social science. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Tagnin, L., & Ní Ríordáin, M. (2021). Building science through questions in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(34).
Valverde Caravaca, R. (2019). Effective questioning in CLIL classrooms: Empowering thinking. ELT Journal, 73(4), 367–376.
Van Mensel, L., Hiligsmann, P., Mettewie, L., & Galand, B. (2020). CLIL, an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(1), 1–14.
Copyright (c) 2024 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Авторы, публикующие статьи в журнале, соглашаются с условиями политики авторских прав.
