Becoming an ESL Researcher: A Personal Monologue

  • Irfan Ahmed Rind Sukkur IBA University
Keywords: reflexivity, self-conversation, qualitative research, philosophical stance, social stance, novice researchers

Abstract

This reflective paper narrates my research journey from a naïve researcher to a critic and from a behaviorist to a post-structuralist. It highlights the different philosophical, methodological, and theoretical dilemmas I faced in conceptualizing students’ experiences in an English as a Second Language program in higher education during my doctoral studies. This journey is divided into three phases: construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction. In the construction phase, I conceptualized students’ experiences from my own established knowledge, which was grounded in my presumptions about teaching and learning. During the deconstruction phase, I questioned my understanding of knowledge and social realities. In the reconstruction phase, I interacted with Phenomenography, Activity Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, Communities of Practice, and Bourdieusian Structuralism. This paper narrates these interactions, focusing mainly on the dilemmas I faced as a researcher. These reflections could be highly beneficial for new researchers who may face the same situations at different stages of their research careers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, I. (2012). Investigating students' experiences of learning English as a second language at the University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan. The Sindh University Journal of Education-SUJE, 45(1), 1-20. http://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/SUJE/article/view/2320.

Ashwin, P. (2012). Analysing teaching-learning interactions in higher education: Accounting for structure and agency. A&C Black.

Berglund, A. (2004). A framework to study learning in a complex learning environment. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(1), 65-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v12i1.21457

Bo, N., Rind, I. A., & Asad, M. (2020). Influence of teacher educators on the development of prospective teachers' personal epistemology and tolerance. Sage Open, 10(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914639

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative research guidelines project. http://www.qualres.org/index.html.

Daniels, H. (2004). Activity theory, discourse and Bernstein. Educational Review, 56(2), 121-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0031910410001693218

Dunne, M., Pryor, J., & Yates, P. (2005). Becoming a researcher: A research companion for the social sciences: A companion to the research process. McGraw-Hill Education.

Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747

Entwistle, N. (1997). Contrasting perspectives on learning. The Experience of Learning, 2, 3-22.

Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205

Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2008). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. Routledge.

Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. ERIC.

Havnes, A. (2004). Examination and learning: an activity-theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 159-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188456

Hawkins, B. (2008). Using sociocultural theory to examine the context (s) of language learning and teaching. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v8i1.1498

Heylighen, F. (1993). Epistemology: Introduction. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/EPISTEMI.html.

Hopman, J. (2021). Fieldwork supervision: Supporting ethical reflexivity to enhance research analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(1), 41-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1706467

Lantolf, J. (2014). (S) econd (L) anguage (A) ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). Taylor and Francis.

Leont'eV, A. N. (1982). Problems of the development of the mind. In Progress Publishers. Progress.

Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11.

McCafferty, S. G. (2002). Gesture and creating zones of proximal development for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 86(2), 192-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00144

Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT press.

Richardson, L. (2000). Evaluating ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 253-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600207

Rind, I. A. (2014). Investigating students' experiences in an ESL programme at the University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan. Compare, 44(6), 1002-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.822244

Rind, I. A. (2015). Gender identities and female students' learning experiences in studying English as Second Language at a Pakistani University. Cogent Education, 2, 1115574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1115574

Rind, I. A. (2016a). Conceptualizing students' learning experiences in English as second language in higher education from structure and agency. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), 1191978.

Rind, I. A. (2016b). How newly appointed ESL teachers' beliefs are translated into their pedagogic strategies. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(1), 2320-7388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0613124132

Rind, I. A., & Alhawsawi, S. (2013). The effects of students' previous learning on graph-comprehension in the English as second language (ESL) textbooks in a Pakistani university. EducationalFutures, 5(2), 44-58. https://educationstudies.org.uk/?p=630.

Rind, I. A., & Kadiwal, L. (2016). Analysing institutional influences on teaching-learning practices of English as second language programme in a Pakistani university. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1160606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1160606

Rind, I. A., & Ning, B. (2020). Evaluating scientific thinking among Shanghai's students of high and low performing schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 113, 364-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1832430

Rind, I. A., Shahriar, A., & Fatima, S. (2016). Rural-ethnic identities & students'learning experiences in english as second language programme in a public sector university of Pakistan. The Sindh University Journal of Education-SUJE, 45(1), 1-20.

Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a Psycholinguistic task. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 79-85). Oxford University Press.

Scott, D. (1999). Values and Educational Research. Institute of Education.

Scott, David, & Usher, R. (1996). Understanding educational research. Psychology Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Published
2021-03-31
How to Cite
RindI. A. (2021). Becoming an ESL Researcher: A Personal Monologue. Journal of Language and Education, 7(1), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10298