Increasing EFL Learner Participation through Eliciting Language: Insights from Conversation Analysis
Abstract
The idea that interaction shapes learning in the second language classroom by increasing opportunities for participation, and that teachers can achieve this by adequately eliciting language from learners has been discussed in the literature. However, research specifying interactional resources deployed by teachers when eliciting language from their learners has been scarce. To this end, the present study used conversation analysis to examine the interactional resources produced in the elicitation of questions belonging to a specific lesson stage, namely, the ‘classroom context mode’ (CCM). In the CCM, fluency and meaningful exchanges are encouraged, and learners are prompted to talk about their feelings, emotions, and experiences, which represent a fruitful interactional juncture for eliciting learner language. The data collected in the present study come from four teachers and their students in an adult English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom at a language institute in Chile. The participants were audio-recorded over a total of six lessons that were delivered as part of a 10-week course. From the analysis, two novel elicitation resources, namely the ‘effective management of closed questions’ and the ‘use of open referential questions as initiators of CCM’, were found to promote a facilitator-oriented approach to teaching. The pedagogical value of these resources is discussed in terms of their potential for initiating and sustaining a CCM, and their inclusion in a framework that seeks to develop teachers’ classroom interactional competence.
Downloads
References
Atkinson, J., & Heritage, J. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. IX-XVI). Cambridge University Press.
Barahona, M. (2016). Challenges and accomplishments of ELT at primary level in Chile: Towards the aspiration of becoming a bilingual country. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(82). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2448
Brock, A. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47-59.
Cancino, M. (2015). Assessing learning opportunities in EFL classroom interaction: What can conversation analysis tell us? RELC Journal, 46(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688214568109.
Cancino, M. (2017). Shaping learner contributions in the EFL language classroom: A conversation analytic perspective. Lenguas Modernas, 49, 53-75.
Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal, 52(3), 179 - 187.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
Glas, K. (2008). El inglés abre puertas.. ¿A qué? Análisis del discurso sobre la enseñanza del inglés en Chile, 2003-2006 [English opens doors.. To what? Analysis of the discourse on teaching English in Chile, 2003-2006]. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 20(51),11-122.
Gómez, E. & Pérez, S. (2015). Chilean 12th graders' attitudes towards English as a foreign language. Colombian Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 313-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.2.a10
Heritage, J. (1997). Conversational analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 161-182). Sage Publications.
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Polity.
Jafari, J. (2013). The role of elicitation questions in language learning: A function-based framework. Anchor Academic Publishing.
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117-142). Taylor & Francis.
Lazaraton, A. (2004). Conversation analysis and the nonnative English speaking ESL teacher: A case study. In D. Boxer & A. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 49-57). Multilingual Matters.
Lee, Y. A. (2006). Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40264304
Lee, W., & Ng, S. (2010). Reducing student reticence through teacher interaction strategy. ELT Journal, 64(3), 302-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp080
Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 583-596.
Markee, N. (2015). The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. John Wiley & Sons.
Matear, A. (2008). English language learning and education policy in Chile: Can English really open doors for all? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(2), 131-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802036679
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
Ministerio de Educación. (2009). Fundamentos del Ajuste Curricular en el sector de Idioma Extranjero, Inglés. Gobierno de Chile.
Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms: A guide for teacher initiated action. Prentice-Hall.
Ortega, L. (2011). SLA after the social turn. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 167-180). Taylor & Francis.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challengse: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In Conceptualising ‘learning' in applied linguistics (pp. 105-126). Palgrave Macmillan.
Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64-91). Sage Publications.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Blackwell Publishing.
Seedhouse, P., & Walsh, S. (2010). Learning a second language through classroom interaction. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising ‘learning'in applied linguistics (pp. 127-146). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Routledge.
Thornbury, S. (1996). Teachers research teacher talk. ELT Journal, 50(4), 279-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.4.279
Tsui, A. (1995). Introducing classroom interaction. Penguin.
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F1362168802lr095oa.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: language in action. Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh University Press.
Waring, H. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577-594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x
Waring, H. (2009). Moving out of IRF (initiation-response-feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796-824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x
Waring, H. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(2), 201-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2011.614053
Waring, H. (2012). Any questions?: Investigating the nature of understanding-checks in the language classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 46(4), 722-752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.48
Waring, H. (2019). The what and how of English language teaching: Conversation analytic perspectives. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1053-1070). Springer.
Waring H., Reddington, E., & Tadic, N. (2016). Responding artfully to student-initiated departures in the adult ESL classroom. Linguistics and education, 33, 28-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.12.001
Wong, J., & Waring, H. (2009). ‘Very good' as a teacher response. ELT Journal, 63(3), 195-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn042
Copyright (c) 2020 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
