Компьютеризированная групповая динамическая оценка и способность к пониманию устной речи: роль самоэффективности
Аннотация
В данном исследовании изучалось влияние групповой динамической оценки с помощью программного обеспечения на способность иранских учащихся, изучающих английский язык как иностранный на уровне intermediate, к пониманию устной речи. Основной вопрос исследования заключался в том, влияет ли динамическая оценка с помощью программного обеспечения CoolSpeech на способность к пониманию устной речи у учащихся с высокой и низкой самоэффективностью. В рамках исследования группы из 120 иранских учащихся были отобраны 80 человек, изучающих английский на уровне intermediate, на основе результатов вступительного теста. Затем с помощью опросника самоэффективности отобранные участники были распределены на две экспериментальные группы: экспериментальную группу с низкой самоэффективностью (n20) и экспериментальную группу с высокой самоэффективностью (n20); также были выделены две контрольные группы по 20 участников в каждой. Во всех группах был проведен предварительный тест на способность к пониманию устной речи; значительной разницы между средними баллами не наблюдалось. После двухмесячного периода, в течение которого экспериментальные группы получали динамическую оценку с помощью программного обеспечения CoolSpeech, а контрольные группы — плацебо, всем группам был проведен посттест на понимание устной речи. Результаты анализа данных показали, что участники экспериментальной группы с высоким уровнем самоэффективности показали значительно более высокие результаты, чем участники других групп. Однако во второй экспериментальной группе значительных изменений не наблюдалось: ее участники не существенно превзошли контрольную группу. В исследовании сделан вывод, что метод групповой динамической оценки с помощью программного обеспечения может оказать значительное влияние на способность к пониманию устной речи у лиц с высокой самоэффективностью, изучающих английский как иностранный.
Скачивания
Литература
Alavi, S. M., & Taheri, P. (2014). Examining the role of dynamic assessment in the development and assessment of listening comprehension. English Language Teaching (ELT), 1(2), 23-40.
Alodail, A. (2014). Impact of technology (power point) on students' learning. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 3(4), 200-206.
Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2006). An assessment of student performances for power point presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computers and Education, 47(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.003
Arnold, J., & Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ashraf, H., Motallebzadeh, K., & Ghazizadeh, F. (2016). The impact of electronic-based dynamic assessment on the listening skill of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Language Testing, 6(1), 24-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.36844
Bernhardt, S. (1997). Self-efficacy and second language learning. The NCLRC Language Resource, 1(5), 1-13.
Berry, J. M., West, R. L., & Dennehey, D. M. (1989). Reliability and validity of the Memory Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 701-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.701
Bingham, S., & Larson, E. (2006). Using CALL as the major element of study for a university English class in Japan. The JALT Journal, 2(3), 39-52.
Brookhart, S. M., & DeVoge, J. G. (1999). Testing a theory about the role of classroom assessment in student motivation and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(4), 409-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1204_5
Chapelle, C. A. (1999). Technology and language teaching for the 21st century. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching. The Crane.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
Coleman, J. A. (2005). CALL from the margins: Effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 17(1), 18-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344005000315
Corbeil, G. (2007). Can power point presentations effectively replace textbooks and blackboards for teaching grammar? Do students find them an effective learning tool? CALICO Journal, 24(3), 631-656.
Doordinejad, F.G., & Afshar, H. (2014). On the relationship between self-efficacy and English achievement among Iranian third grade high school students. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 461-470.
Drasgow, F., & Olson-Buchanan, J.B. (1999). Innovations in computerized assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ehrman, M. E. (1996). An exploration of adult language learning motivation, self-efficacy and anxiety. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning motivation: pathways to the new century (pp. 23-46). The University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.
Gerard, R. W. (Ed.). (1967). Computers and education. McGraw Hill.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71,279-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
Gorban Doordinejad, F., & Afshar, H. (2014). On the relationship between self-efficacy and English achievement among Iranian third grade high school students. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 461-470.
Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Advances in assessment models, methods, and practices. In D. C. Berliner, & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 889-925). American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Hashemi Shahraki, S., Ketabi, S., & Barati, H. (2015). Group dynamic assessment of EFL listening comprehension: Conversational implicatures in focus. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(3), 73-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2014.955
Hill, K., & Sabet, M. (2009). Dynamic speaking assessments. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 537-545. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27785036.
Hosseini, S. M. H. (2007). ELT in higher education in Iran and India: A critical view. Language in India, 7, 1-11. http://www.languageinindia.com/dec2007/eltinindiaandiran.pdf.
Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 130-150. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-journals/evaluation-of-efl-materials-taught-at-iranian-public-high-schools.
Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life under-mines reform. Harvard University Press.
Koura, A. A., & Al-Hebaishi, S. M. (2014). The Relationship between multiple intelligences, self-efficacy and academic achievement of Saudi gifted and regular intermediate students. Educational Research International, 3(1), 48-70.
Kulik, J. A., Bangert, R. L., & Williams, G. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.19
Lau, R. W. H., Yen, N. Y., Li, F., & Wah, B. (2014). Recent development in multimedia e-learning technologies. World Wide Web,17, 189-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-013-0206-8
Lave J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S.Ageyev & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 99-116). Cambridge University Press.
Mashhadi Heidar, D., & Afghari, A. (2015). The effect of dynamic assessment in synchronous computer-mediated communication on Iranian EFL learners' listening comprehension ability at upper-intermediate level. English Language Teaching, 8(4), 14-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n4p14
Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2016). ZPD-assisted introduction via web 2.0 and listening comprehension ability. English for Specific Purposes World, 49(17).
Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 276-294.
Minick, N. (1987). The development of Vygotsky's thought: An introduction. In R.W. Reiber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology (pp. 17-36). Plenum Press.
Mohammadi, E., & Mirdehghan, S. S. (2014). A CMC approach to teaching phrasal-verbs to Iranian EFL senior high school students: The case of blended learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1174-1178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.531
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL speaking and listening. Routledge.
Nutta, J. (2013). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16(1), 49-62.
Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20(2), 240-254.
Pajares, F. (2000). Self-efficacy beliefs and current directions in self-efficacy research. http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/effpage.html.
Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. The Pennsylvania State University.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment. A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer International Publishing.
Poehner, M. E. (2009). Dynamic assessment as a dialectical framework for classroom activity: Evidence from second language (l2) learners. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(3), 252-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.8.3.252
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9, 233-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
Puakpong, N. (2008). An evaluation of a listening comprehension program. In F. Zhang & B. Barber (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-enhanced Language acquisition and learning. IGI Global.
Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners' self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 14-28.
Rahimi, M., & Hosseini, F. K. (2011). The impact of computer-based activities on Iranian high-school students' attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 183-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.031
Razmjoo, S. A., & Riazi, M. (2006). Is communicative language teaching practical in the expanding circle? A case study of teachers of Shiraz high schools and institutes. Journal of Language and Learning, 4(2), 144-171.
Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/GYMQ-78FA-WMTX-J06C
Rubin, J. (1995). An overview to a guide for the teaching of second language listening. In D. J. Mendelsohn, & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 7-11). Dominie Press, Inc.
Shabani, K., Alavi, S. M., & Kaivanpanah, S. (2012). Group dynamic assessment: An inventory of mediational strategies for teaching listening. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 30(4), 27-58.
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English Language Teaching Journal, 3(4), 237-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press.
Thiagarajan, S. (1999). Formative evaluation in performance technology. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(2), 22-24.
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in Action. Taylor & Francis.
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1984a. Sobranie Sochinenii, Tom chetvertyi: Detskaya psikhilogii[collected works (vol. 4: Child psychology). Izdatel'stvo Pedagogika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Infancy. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (pp. 207-241). Plenum Press.
Wang, Y. H. (2016). Promoting contextual vocabulary learning through an adaptive computer-assisted EFL reading system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 291-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12132
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and Language Learning: An overview Published online by Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970
Yildirim, A. G. O. (2008). Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and dynamic assessment in language learning. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 301-308.
Yusof, N. A., & Saadon, N. (2012). The Effects of Web-based Language Learning on University Students' Grammar Proficiency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 402-408.
Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24149478.
Copyright (c) 2020 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Авторы, публикующие статьи в журнале, соглашаются с условиями политики авторских прав.