Use of Nonlinear Dynamic Motivational Strategies to Manage L2 Academic Entitlement and Psychological Reactance

Keywords: academic entitlement (AE), psychological reactance (PR), nonlinear dynamic motivational strategies (NDMSs), complex dynamics systems theory (CDST)

Abstract

Expanding the dynamicity and nonlinearity of L2 motivation introduced by Bahari (2019a) based on the complex dynamics systems theory has served as the theoretical framework to introduce and contextualize nonlinear dynamic motivational strategies (NDMSs). The present study used the NDMSs to manage L2 academic entitlement and psychological reactance as two obstructive factors in the L2 learning-teaching process. For conceptualization purposes, a mixed methods approach was conducted among teachers as well as learners to examine the effectiveness of proposed strategies as a pedagogical tool to manage and minimize these obstructive factors in academic contexts. The observed effectiveness of the NDMSs at managing and minimizing the analyzed obstructive factors along with replacing teacher-centered and test-oriented L2 classrooms with a learner-friendly motivating L2 classroom has significant pedagogical and theoretical implications. The major finding of the study following a rigorous methodological triangulation of the data that was collected confirms the effectiveness of the NDMSs as an L2 teaching strategy to cater to the diversity of individual differences for the purpose of improving teacher-learner interactions. Drawing on the results, it can be safely concluded that the NDMSs as the independent variable of the study showed significant impact on managing and minimizing academic entitlement and psychological reactance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achacoso, M. V. (2002). What do you mean my grade is not an A? An investigation of academic entitlement, causal attributions, and self-regulation in college students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.

Bahari, A. (2018). Nonlinear dynamic motivation-oriented telecollaborative model of language learning via formulaic sequences to foster learner autonomy. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 65-81. http://www.tewtjournal.org.

Bahari, A. (2019a). FonF practice model from theory to practice: CALL via focus on form approach and nonlinear dynamic motivation to develop listening and speaking proficiency. Computers & Education, 130(3), 40-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.009

Bahari, A. (2019b). The Impact of applying FonF practice model on developing L2 listening and speaking with a focus on intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition in CALL context. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 14, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2019.10785

Bahari, A. (2020a). Mainstream theoretical trends and future directions of L2 motivation studies in classroom and CALL contexts. CALL-EJ, 21(1), 1-28.

Bahari, A. (2020b). Computer-Assisted Language Proficiency Assessment Tools and Strategies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 34-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1726738

Bjorklund, W. L., & Rehling, D. L. (2009). Student perceptions of classroom incivility. College Teaching, 58(1), 15-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903252801

de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(1), 7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732

de Bot, K., & Larsen Freeman, L. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5-24). John Benjamins.

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.

Brehm, S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.

Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and teachers' practices. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Hill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 66-84). Routledge.

Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04

Chartrand, T. L., Dalton, A. N., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2007). Nonconscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.003

Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of Psychology Test between Likert Scale 5 and 6 Points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399-403.

Chowning, K., & Campbell, N. J. (2009). Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students' externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 982-997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016351

Ciani, K. D., Summers, J. J., & Easter, M. A. (2008). Gender differences in academic entitlement among college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(4), 332-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.169.4.332-344

Clark, C. M., & Springer, P. J. (2007). Thoughts on incivility: Student and faculty perceptions of uncivil behavior in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(2), 93-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-4-3-2

Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility at the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64

Csizer, K., & Luk_acs, G. (2010). The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.001

Csizer, K., & Magid, M. (Eds.). (2014). The impact of self-concept on language learning. Multilingual Matters.

Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2

Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E.Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). Continuum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474212397.ch-009

Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self-images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63, 437-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005

Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & Muir, C. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. Routledge.

Dörnyei, Z., Ibrahim, Z., & Muir, C. (2015). Directed Motivational Currents: Regulating complex dynamic systems through motivational surges. In Z. Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.

Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.

Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1994). Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1006

Feldmann, L. J. (2001). Classroom civility is another of our instructor responsibilities. College Teaching, 49, 137-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2001.10844595

Fives, H., & Gill, M. G. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs. Routledge.

Fives, H., Lacatena, N., & Gerard, L. (2015). Teachers' beliefs about teaching (and learning). In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 249-265). Routledge.

Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 469-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00026-6

Fusella, P. V. (2013). Dynamic systems theory in cognitive science: Major elements, applications, and debates surrounding a revolutionary meta-theory. Dynamic Psychology, 1, 258-307. http://dynapsyc.org/2013/Fusella.pdf.

Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). Macmillan.

Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. P. (2008). Self- entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(10), 1193-1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9284-9

Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.

Henry, A., Davydenko, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2015). The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. Modern Language Journal, 99, 329- 345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12214

Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor states. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 20-28). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2501.8722

Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting Complexity Theory into practice. Modern Language Journal, 100, 741-756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12347

Hoover, E. (2007). Here's looking at you, kid: Study says many students are narcissists. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(27). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ757228.

Jiang, Y., & Dewaele, J. M. (2015). What lies bubbling beneath the surface? A longitudinal perspective on fluctuations of ideal and Ought-to L2 self among Chinese learners of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 331-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0015

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x

Kikuchi, K. (2015). Demotivation in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.

Kim, K. J. (2009). Demotivating factors in secondary English education. English Teaching, 64(4), 249-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.64.4.200912.249

Kim, S., Levine, T., & Allen, M. (2013). Comparing separate process and intertwined models for reactance. Communication Studies, 64, 273-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.755639

Lamb, M. (2012). A self-system perspective on young adolescents' motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62(4), 997-1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00719.x

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015a). Ten ‘lessons' from Complex Dynamic Systems Theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11-19). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-004

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015b). Complexity theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 227-244). Routledge.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., Proudfoot, D., & Fitzsimons, G, J. (2013). Response to restrictive policies: Reconciling system justification and psychological reactance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 152-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.06.004

Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049386

Liu, Y., & Thompson, A.S. (2018). Language learning motivation in China: An exploration of the L2MSS and psychological reactance. System, 72, 37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.025

Lombardi, J. V. (2007). The academic success entitlement. Inside Higher Education. http://www.insidehighered.com.

Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 57-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469809

MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing and idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037

Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60156-2

Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory-40 years later. Social Psychology, 37, 9-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9

Morrow, W. (1994). Entitlement and achievement in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13(1), 33-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074084

Moskovsky, C., Racheva, S., Assulaimani, T., & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 Motivational Self System and L2 Achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 641-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12340

Oxford, R. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Quick, B. L., & Considine, J. R. (2008). Examining the use of forceful language when designing exercise persuasive messages for adults: A test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Health Communication, 23, 483-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802342150

Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34, 255-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207300427

Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 655-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038648

Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39, 47-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x

Rusk, R. D., & Waters, L. (2015). A psycho-social system approach to well-being: Empirically deriving the five domains of positive functioning. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 141-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.920409

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge.

Serafini, E. J. (2017). Exploring the dynamic long-term interaction between cognitive and psychosocial resources in adult second language development at varying proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 369-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12400

Sheldon, K., Boehm, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Variety is the spice of happiness: The hedonic adaptation prevention (HAP) model. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 901-914). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0067

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.

Thompson, A. S., (2017). Don't tell me what to do! The anti-ought-to self and language learning motivation. System, 67, 38-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.004

Thompson, A. S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). Operationalizing multilingualism: Language learning motivation in Turkey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 314-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.985631

Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today's young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled - And more miserable than ever before. Free Press.

Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond Global English: Motivation to learn languages in a multicultural world: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 451-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12407

You, C., & Chan, L. (2015). The dynamics of L2 imagery in future motivational self-guides. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 405-430). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137457134_3

You, C., Dörnyei, Z. & Csiz'er, K. (2016). Motivation, vision, and gender: A survey of learners of English in China, language learning, 66(1), 94-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12140

Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z., & de Bot, K. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability, and context. Modern Language Journal, 98, 704-723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12118

Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of children's motivations for reading: An initial study (Research Rep. No. 34). National Reading Research Center.

Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420

Published
2020-03-31
How to Cite
BahariA. (2020). Use of Nonlinear Dynamic Motivational Strategies to Manage L2 Academic Entitlement and Psychological Reactance. Journal of Language and Education, 6(1), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10099