Role of Task Repetition and Content Familiarity in EFL Students’ Fluency and Accuracy in Narrative Tasks: A Case Study
Abstract
Developing writing skills has become a priority for many students in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. To this end, classroom practices should be facilitative of opportunities to communicate accurately and fluently in written and oral forms. Drawing on evidence which suggests that task repetition allows students to perform subsequent tasks more efficiently and accurately, the study examines the likely effect of procedural repetition with four narrative tasks (i.e. narrating stories in written form after watching short animated videos) on five EFL students’ fluency and accuracy (AF). To do this, the levels of the students’ AF were measured during the performance of each task. Moreover, qualitative data from questionnaires administered to the students after each task were also included to better understand the behavior of the AF levels in relation to their perceptions of the task performance and the familiarity with the content of the tasks. The evidence shows that the students’ AF tended to progressively increase as weeks went by. The highest AF levels were found in the tasks where the content was familiar to the students. The opposite was observed when the students claimed not to be familiar with the content. The argument that we put forward in this article is that task (procedural) repetition may be beneficial for enhancing students’ AF in writing task performance; however, if this practice combines with the students’ lack of content familiarity, AF may engage in a dynamic interaction in which trade-off effects can be observed.
Downloads
References
Abdi, M., Eslami, H., & Zahedi, Y. (2012). The impact of pre-task planning on the fluency and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners' oral performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2281-2288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.199
Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). Task repetition in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(3), 380-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs020
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners‟ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168811425433.
Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence, & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (vol. 2, pp. 89-195). Academic Press.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Bui, G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63-93). John Benjamins.
Bui, G., & Huang, Z. (2018). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: performance, measurement, and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 94-114. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168816656650.
Bygate, M. & Samuda V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in second language (pp. 37-73). John Benjamins.
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis, & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136-146). Heinemann.
Bygate, M. (1999). Task a context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(98)00048-7
Chang, Y. F. (1999). Discourse topics and interlanguage variation. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Representation and process: Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific Second Language Research Forum (vol. 1, pp. 235-241). PacSLRF.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in second language (pp. 3-34). John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474-509. %2FAMP042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/APPLIN
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104026130
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg, & F. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Foster, P. (1999). Task-based language learning and pedagogy. ELT Journal, 53(9), 69-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522961_2
Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners' attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168815570142.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernandez-Garcia, M. (1999). The effects 89 of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00102
Gery, W. R., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 835-850). Sage Publications.
Ghavamnia, M., Tavakoli, M., & Esteki, M. (2013). The effect of pre-task and online planning conditions on complexity, accuracy, and fluency on EFL learners' written production. Porta Linguarium, 20, 31-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.29559
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Heasly, B. (2006). Study writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Huitt, W. (2003). The information processing approach to cognition. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta State University. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/infoproc.html.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 57-71). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., Turner, C. E., Cahill, M., & Mertens, A. (2013). Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 Model. Journal of Writing Research, 5(2), 159-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.02.1
Khezrlou, S. (2019). Task repetition and corrective feedback: The role of feedback types and structure saliency. English Teaching and Learning, 43(2), 213-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-019-00025-2
Khezrlou, S. (2020). The role of task repetition with direct written corrective feedback in L2 writing complexity, accuracy and fluency. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(1), 31-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19025.khe
Kuhi, D., Rasuli, M. A., & Deylami, Z. (2014). The effects of type of writing on accuracy, fluency and complexity across proficiency. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1036-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.514
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085
Lambert, C., Robinson, P. (2014). Learning to perform narrative tasks: A semester-long classroom study of L2 task sequencing effects. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 207-230). Bloomsbury Academic.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
Lutz, S., & Huitt, W. (2003). Information processing and memory: Theory and applications. In W. Huitt (Ed.), Becoming a brilliant star: Twelve core ideas supporting holistic education (pp. 25-43). IngramSpark.
Lynch, T. & Maclean, J. (2001). Effects of immediate task repetition on learners' performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). Longman.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221-50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F136216880000400303.
Manchón, R. M, & Roca de Larios, J. (2011). Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners' perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning to write and writing to learn in an additional language (pp. 181-207). John Benjamins.
Manchón, R. M, & Vasylets, O. (2019). Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In J. W. Schwieter, & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 341-362). Cambridge University Press.
Manchón, R. M. (2014). Learning and teaching writing in the FL classroom: Fostering writing-to-learn approaches. In P. Driscoll, E. Macaro, & A. Swarbrick (Eds.), Debates in modern language education (pp. 96-107). Routledge.
Muranoi, H. (2007). Output practice in the L2 classroom. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language learning: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 51-84). Cambridge University Press.
Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 218-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.003
Qiu, X. (2019). Functions of oral monologic tasks: Effects of topic familiarity on L2 speaking performance. Language Teaching Research, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829021
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 161-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2007.007
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Skehan, P. (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance.John Benjamins.
Skehan, P. (2018). Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, assessment. Routledge.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120. 10.1111/1467- 9922.00071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071
Sohn, M., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 764-778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.764
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 61(1), 37-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00642.x
Van de Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bimmel, P. (2016). Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 300-320. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168815609616.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., &. Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawaii Press.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1
Copyright (c) 2021 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
