Data Commentary in Research Publications: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Introduction: The modality of scholarly written communication offers verbal and visual modes that are supposedly to be interrelated. The verbal component is thoroughly studied whereas the visual, including tables, charts, graphs and others are mainly described from a technical perspective. The editorial review aims to synthesize research on data commentary as a comparatively new rhetorical genre.
Method: The review adhered to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews, and the PPC framework. The eligibility criteria include problem, concept, context, language, types of sources,
Results: The searches and consequent screening by titles, abstracts, keywords and full texts identified 19 relevant publications – articles and books – mainly indexed in the Scopus and SpringerLink databases. The books on academic writing focused on the three themes: general guidelines on data commentary, functions, and rhetorical structure of such commentaries, figure legends and notes to tables. The functional analysis of the publications singled out a prevailing framework, including rhetorical, ontological, epistemological, and argumentative functions. The rhetorical steps in data commentaries follow patterns suitable for the type of a visual. The review outlines generic steps described and proved by the research publications included in the review.
Conclusion: Though the research field is scattered, and no definite trends were specified, the potential of the field is rising as the implications of such studies are significant. A constant trend towards more visualization of the new knowledge requires more research on the interrelations between the verbal and the visual, with a special accent on data commentary.
Downloads
References
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1364557032000119616
Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2013). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps. Wiley-Blackwell.
Clymo, R. S. (2014). Reporting research: A biologist’s guide to articles, talks, and posters. Cambridge University Press.
Cocchiarella, L. (Ed.). (2015). The visual language of technique (vol.2. Heritage and expectations in research). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Dougherty, J. & Ilyankou, I. (2021). Hands-on data visualization. Interactive storytelling from spreadsheets to code. O’Reilly.
Du, Z., Jiang, F., & Liu, L. (2021). Profiling figure legends in scientific research articles: A corpus-driven approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101054
Eriksson, A., & Nordrum, L. (2018). Unpacking challenges of data commentary writing in master’s thesis projects: an insider perspective from chemical engineering. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1460339
Franzblau, L. E., & Chung, K. C. (2012). Graphs, tables, and figures in scientific publications: The good, the bad, and how not to be the latter. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 37(3), 591-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.041
Goodwin, C. (2001). Practices of seeing visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157-182). Sage.
Graves, H. (2014). The rhetoric of (interdisciplinary) science: Visuals and the construction of facts in nanotechnology. Poroi, 10, 2, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1207
Gross, A. G., & Harmon, J. E. (2014). Science from sight to insight: How scientists illustrate meaning. University of Chicago Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Hemais, B.J.W. (2014). Word and image in academic writing: A study of verbal and visual meanings in marketing articles. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 2, 2, 113-133.
Jagadeesh, G., Balakumar, P., & Senatore, F. (Eds.). (2023). The quintessence of basic and clinical research and scientific publishing. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1284-1
Johns, A.M. (1998). The visual and the verbal: A case study in macroeconomics. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 2, 183-197.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Lövei, G.L. (2021). Writing and publishing scientific papers a primer for the non-English speaker. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0235
Lui, L., Jiang, F., & Du, Z. (2023). Figure legends of scientific research articles: Rhetorical moves and phrase frames. English for Specific Purposes, 70, 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.11.005
Miller, J.E. (2004). The Chicago guide to writing about numbers. The effective presentation of quantitive information. The University of Chicago Press.
Miller, T. (1998). Visual persuasion: A comparison of visuals in academic texts and the popular press. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 1, 29-46.
Mishra, P. (2004). The Role of abstraction in scientific illustration: implications for pedagogy. In C. Handa (Ed.), Visual rhetoric in a digital world: A sourcebook (pp. 177 – 194). Bedford/St. Martins.
Moghaddasi, S., Graves, H.A.B., Graves, R. (2019). “See Figure 1”: Visual moves in discrete mathematics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 56, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.08.001
Morell, T. (2015). International conference paper presentations: A multimodal analysis to determine effectiveness. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 137-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.002
O’Halloran, K. L. (2010). The semantic hyperspace: Accumulating mathematical knowledge across semiotic resources and modalities. In F. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 217-236). Continuum.
O’Toole, M. (1996). A systemic-functional semiotics of art. In P. Fries & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Parija, S.C., & Kate, V. (Eds.) (2017). Writing and publishing a scientific research paper. Springer Nature. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6
Parviz M., & Lan G. (2023). A corpus-based investigation of phrasal complexity features and rhetorical functions in data commentary. Journal of Language and Education, 9(3), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.16044
Prus, R. (1987). Generic Social Processes: Maximizing Conceptual Development in Ethnographic Research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16 (3), 250–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241687163002
Royce, T. (2002). Multimodality in the TESOL classroom: Exploring visual-verbal synergy. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 191-204. http://doi.org/ 10.2307/3588330
Saver, C. (2006). Tables and figures: adding vitality to your article. AORN Journal, 84(6), 945-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)63991-4
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
Tang, K.-S. (2023). Distribution of visual representations across scientific genres in secondary science textbooks: analysing multimodal genre pattern of verbal-visual texts. Research in Science Education, 53(2), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10058-6
Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D.J., Horseley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., & Akl, E.A. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–73. https://doi.org/10. 7326/M18-0850
van den Scott, L.-J.K. (2018). Visual methods in ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47, 6, 719-728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241618806972
Wallwork, A. (2023). English for writing research papers. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31072-0
Wallwork, A., & Sothern, A. (2020), 100 tips to avoid mistakes in academic writing and presenting. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44214-9
Wu, J., Zhao, C.G., Lu, X., & Jin, T. (2024). A rhetorical function and phraseological analysis of commentaries on visuals. English for Specific Purposes, 73, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.09.001
Zhang, L., Jang, R., & Zhang, J. (2024). ‘Table 1 shows that.’: A local grammar of graphic data commentary in discourse of Economics. English for Specific Purposes, 74, 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.01.001
Copyright (c) 2024 National Research University Higher School of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the Copyright Notice.
