Использование лингвистических инструментов на основе генеративного искусственного интеллекта в академическом письме: обзор предметного поля
Аннотация
Введение: Академическое письмо переживает трансформационные изменения с появлением в 2022 году генеративных инструментов на базе ИИ. Это подстегнуло исследования в развивающейся области, которые сосредоточены на применении инструментов, основанных на ИИ, в академическом письме. Поскольку технологии ИИ быстро меняются, регулярное обобщение новых знаний требует пересмотра.
Цель: Несмотря на то, что существуют обзоры предметного поля и систематические обзоры некоторых подобластей, настоящий обзор ставит своей целью определить границы поля, посвященного изучению инструментов на базе генеративного искусственного интеллекта в академическом письме.
Метод: Обзор соответствует алгоритму PRISMA для исследований предметного поля и рамочной конструкции PPC. Критерии приемлемости включают РРС - проблему, концепцию, контекст; язык, предметную область, типы источников, базу данных (Scopus) и период (2023-2024 гг.).
Результаты: Три кластера, установленные для 44 публикаций обзора, включают: (1) ИИ в совершенствовании академического письма; (2) вызовы ИИ в академическом письме; (3) авторство и этика. Потенциал языковых инструментов ИИ охватывает множество функций (генерация текста, корректура, редактирование, аннотирование текста, перефразирование и перевод) и обеспечивает помощь в исследованиях и академическом письме, предлагает стратегии для гибридного написания текстов с помощью ИИ в рамках различных заданий и жанров и улучшения качества письма. Инструменты на базе ИИ также изучаются в качестве инструмента обратной связи. Проблемы и опасения, связанные с использованием таких инструментов, варьируются от авторства до чрезмерного доверия к таким инструментам, введения в заблуждение или фальсификации, неточное указание источников, неспособность сформировать в тексте авторский голос. Результаты обзора соответствуют тенденциям, обозначенным в предыдущих публикациях, хотя все больше исследований посвящено механизмам интеграции инструментов гибридного написания текстов с использованием ИИ в различных контекстах. Дискурс в этой области переходит к пересмотру понятий авторства и оригинальности генерируемого ИИ контента.
Заключение: Направления исследований претерпели некоторую переориентацию, появились новые эмпирические данные и новые фокусы в этой области. Трансформация академического письма ускоряется, в академических кругах вырабатываются новые стратегии для решения проблем и переосмысления основных концепций в соответствии с изменениями. Необходимы дальнейшие регулярные обобщения нового знания, включая дополнительные обзоры всех существующих и возникающих подобластей предметного поля.
Скачивания
Литература
Ahn, S. (2024). The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: Current applications, challenges and future directions. The Korean Journal of Physiology & Ppharmacology: Official Journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology, 28(5), 393-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393
Alberth, A. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in writing: A blessing or a curse in disguise? Teflin Journal, 34(2), 337-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2/337-352
Alea Albada, N., & Woods, V.E. (2024). Giving credit where credit is due: An artificial intelligence contribution statement for research methods writing assignments. Teaching of Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241259750
Alexander, C. (2023). Best practices for using ChatGPT at the university of Nicosia [Training delivered to University of Nicosia faculty]. Nicosia.
Alkamel, M.A.A., & Alwagieh, N.A.S. (2024). Utilizing an adaptable artificial intelligence writing tool (ChatGPT) to enhance academic writing skills among Yemeni university EFL students. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10, Article 101095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101095
Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: A comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1347421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework.International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Atkinson, & Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Routledge.
Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal for English for Academic Purposes, 5, 97-116. http://doiorg/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
Bolaños, F., Salatino, A., Osborne, F., & Motta, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: Opportunities and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(9), Article 259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10902-3
Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative AI, synthetic contents, open educational resources (OER), and open educational practices (OEP): A new front in the openness landscape. Open Praxis, 15(3), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579
Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, authorship, ownership, academic ethics and integrity in a time of generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
Coffin, C., Curry, M.J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, M., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing; A toolkit for higher education. Routledge.
Eaton, S.E. (2023). Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology.International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), Article 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1
Fabiano, N., Gupta, A., Bhambra, N., Luu, B., Wong, S., Maaz, M., Fiedorowicz, J. G., Smith, A. L., & Solmi, M. (2024). How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools. JCPP Advances, Article e12234. http://doi.org/10/1002/jvc2.12234.
Gralha, J.G., & Pimentel, A.S. (2024). Gotcha GPT: Ensuring the integrity in academic writing. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 64(21), 8091-8097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01203
Gunawan, J., Aungsuroch, Y., & Montayre, J. (2024). ChatGPT integration within nursing education and its implications for nursing students: A systematic review and text network analysis. Nurse Education Today, 141, Article 106323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106323
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
Jarrah, A.M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), Article e202346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572
Johnston, H., Wells, R.F., Shanks, E.M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B.N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education.International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Kandeel, M.E., & Eldakak, A. (2024). Legal dangers of using ChatGPT as a co-author according to academic research regulations. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 13(1 Special issue), 289-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i1siart3
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, Article 100145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
Khlaif, Z.N., Mousa, A., Hattab, M.K., Itmazi, J., Hassan, A.A., Sanmugam, M., & Ayyoub, A. (2023). The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation. Medical Education, 9(1), Article e47049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47049
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2024). Exploring students' perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kim, S.J. (2024a). Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review. Science Editing, 11(2), 96-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.343
Kim, S.G. (2023). Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00381-x
Kim, S.J. (2024b). Trends in research on ChatGPT and adoption-related issues discussed in articles: A narrative review. Science Editing, 11, 3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.321
Kohnke, L. (2024). Exploring EAP students' perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning.Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279
Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024a) AI, will you help? How learners use Artificial Intelligence when writing. XLinguae, 17(1), 34-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.03
Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024b). Artificial intelligence tools in academic writing instruction: Exploring the potential of on-demand AI assistance in the writing process. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 72(6), 123-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh247206.8
Kurt, G., & Kurt, Y. (2024). Enhancing L2 writing skills: ChatGPT as an automated feedback tool. Journal of Information.
Technology Education: Research, 23, Article 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/5370
Li, J., Zong, H., Wu, E., Wu, R., Peng, Z., Zhao, J., Yang, L., Xie, H., & Shen, B. (2024). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of English academic papers by non-native English-speaking medical students - the educational application of ChatGPT. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y
Liao, W., Liu, Z., Dai, H., Xu, S., Wu, Z., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., Zhu, D., Cai, H., Li, Q., Liu, T., & Li, X. (2023). Differentiating ChatGPT-generated and human-written medical texts: Quantitative study. JMIR Medical Education, 9, Article e48904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/48904
Liu, J.Q.J., Hui, K.T.K., Al Zoubi, F., Zhou, Z.Z.X., Samartzis, D., Yu, C.C.H., Chang, J.R., & Wong, A.Y.L. (2024). The great detectives: Humans versus AI detectors in catching large language model-generated medical writing.International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), Article 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00155-6
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students' academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Mahyoob, M., Algaraady, J., & Alblwi, A. (2023). A proposed framework for human-like language processing of ChatGPT in academic writing.International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(14), 282-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.41725
Malik, A.R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I.W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., Marzuki (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student's perspective.International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, Article 100296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Maphoto, K.B., Sevnarayan, K., Mohale, N.E., Suliman, Z., Ntsopi, T.J., & Mokoena, D.Advancing (2024). Students' academic excellence in distance education: Exploring the potential of generative AI integration to improve academic writing skills. Open Praxis, 16(2), 142-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.649
Miao, J., Charat, T., Supawadee, S., Garcia Valencia, O.A., Qureshi, F., & Cheungpasitporn (2024). Ethical dilemmas in using AI for academic writing and an example framework for peer review in nephrology academia: A narrative review. Clinics and Practice, 14(10), 89-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14010008
Misra, D.P., & Chandwar, K. (2023). ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and scientific writing: What authors, peer reviewers and editors should know? Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715231181023
Mohammad, T., Alzubi, A.A.F., Nazim, M., & Khan, S.I. (2024). Paraphrasing prowess: Unveiling the insights of EFL students and teachers on QuillBot mastery.International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(5), 642-650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.5.2088
Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12234
Morreale, M.K., Balon, R., Beresin, E.V., Seritan, A., Castillo, E.G., Thomas, L.A., Louie, A.K., Aggarwal, R., Guerrero, A.P.S., Coverdale, J., & Brenner, A.M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and medical education, academic writing, and journal policies: A focus on Large Language Models. Academic Psychiatry. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-02071-w
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593
Ou, A.W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System, 121, Article 103225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225
Okaibedi, D. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, Article 100060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Parker, J.L., Richard, V.M., Acabá, A., Escoffier, S., Flaherty, S., Jablonka, S., & Becker, K.P. (2024). Negotiating meaning with machines: AI's role in doctoral writing pedagogy.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00425-x
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Rababah, L.M., Rababah, M.A., & Al-Khawaldeh, N.N. (2024). Graduate students' ChatGPT experience and perspectives during thesis writing.International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(3), 22-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48395
Rafida, T., Suwandi, S., Ananda, R. (2024). EFL students' perception in Indonesia and Taiwan on using artificial intelligence to enhance writing skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 987-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1520
Raitskaya, L., & Lambovska, M. (2024). Prospects for ChatGPT application in higher education: A scoping review of international research.Integration of Education, 28(1), 10-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.114.028.202401.010-021
Rao, K.N., Arora, R.D., Dange, P., & Nagarkar, N.M. (2023). NLP AI models for optimizing medical research: Demystifying the concerns. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14, 854-858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-023-01791-z
Shorey, S., Mattar, C., Pereira, T.L.-B., & Choolani, M. (2024). A scoping review of ChatGPT's role in healthcare education and research. Nurse Education Today, 135, 106121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106121
Tarchi, C., Zappoli, A., Casado Ledesma, L., & Brante, E.W. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in source-based writing tasks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00413-1
Temsah, O., Khan, S.A., Chaiah, Y., Senjab, A., Alhasan, K., Jamal, A., Aljamaan, F., Malki, K.H., Halwani, R., Al-Tawfiq, J.A.
Temsah, M.-H., & Al-Eyadhy, A. (2023). Overview of early ChatGPT's presence in medical literature: Insights from a hybrid literature review by ChatGPT and human experts. Cureus, 15, Article e37281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37281
Teng, M.F. (2023). Scientific writing, reviewing, and editing for open-access TESOL journals: The role of ChatGPT.International Journal of TESOL Studies, 5(1), 87-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230107
Tewari, S., Zabounidis, R., Kothari, A., Bailey, R., & Alm, C.O. (2021). Perceptions of human and machine-generated articles. Digital Threats: Research and Practice, 2(2), Article 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3428158
Thorp, H.H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), Article 313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Tikhonova, E., & Raitskaya, L. (2023). ChatGPT: Where is a silver lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and Large Language Models. Journal of Language and Education, 9(3), 5-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.18119
Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D.J., Horseley, T., Weeks, L.
Hempel, S., & Akl, E.A. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Tusting, K., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D. (2019). Academics writing. The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge.
Utami, S.P.T., Andayani, Winarni, R., Sumarwati (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
Williams, A. (2024).Comparison of generative AI performance on undergraduate and postgraduate written assessments in the biomedical sciences.International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00485-y
Yao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, S., & Zhu, X. (2024). A Qualitative inquiry into metacognitive strategies of postgraduate students in employing ChatGPT for English academic writing. European Journal of Education, Article e12824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12824
Copyright (c) 2024 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Авторы, публикующие статьи в журнале, соглашаются с условиями политики авторских прав.
