Переосмысление парадигмы присутствия автора в научном письменном дискурсе: систематический обзор
Аннотация
Введение: Различные лингвистические механизмы применяются в академическом письме, чтобы сообщить мнение и оценки авторов и взаимодействовать с читателями. Концепции голоса автора, позиции и идентичности автора выделяются среди понятий, описывающих различные аспекты, связанные с автором в письменном академическом дискурсе.
Цель: Синтез знаний относительно механизмов репрезентации мнения и оценок авторского коллектива и его взаимодействия с читателями в теле рукописи в международных журналах с целью определения часто используемых и взаимозаменяемых терминов.
Результаты: В обзоре были обобщены 40 публикаций по связанным с автором концепциям, индексированным в базе данных Scopus. Документы были распределены по трем тематическим кластерам: Группа 1. Идентичность в академическом письме и концепции, связанные с автором. Кластер 2. Авторский голос в академическом дискурсе. Кластер 3. Позиция автора. Данные, извлеченные из рассматриваемых документов по ключевым концепциям авторов в академическом письме - голос, позиция и идентичность авторов - позволили обобщить определения и основные особенности, способствующие пониманию этих концепций. Обзор показал, что терминология в этой области является довольно нечеткой и неоднозначной. Ключевые концепции, как правило, используются взаимозаменяемо. Ограничения обзора были включены в некоторых критериях отбора, включая публикации на других языках, географию и типы публикаций. Будущие обзоры могут быть посвящены публикациям посвященным авторскому взаимодействию с читателями, которые будут проиндексированы в других базах данных, помимо Scopus, чтобы дать более реалистичную картину.
Выводы: Результаты данного обзора могут стать основой для будущих исследований авторского голоса, позиции, идентичности в академическом дискурсе, а также других связанных с автором концепций.
Скачивания
Литература
Ädel, A. (2022). Writer and reader visibility in humanities research articles: Variation across language, regional variety and discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.09.001
Alghazo, S., Al Salem, M.N., & Alrashdan, I. (2021). Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System, 103, Article 102681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102681
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/101080/1364557032000119616
Azar, A.S., & Hashim, A. (2022). Analysing authorial identity construction in the review article genre in applied linguistics. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 94-114. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21898
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
Baratta, A.M. (2009). Revealing stance through passive voice. Journal of Pragmatics, 1406-1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.010
Barbara, S.W.Y., Afzaal, M., & Aldayel, S. (2024). A corpus-based comparison of linguistic markers of stance and genre in the academic writing of novice and advanced engineering learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 284. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02757-4
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education.
Candarli, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Marti, L. (2015). Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.001
Chen, R. (2020). Single author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, Article 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100856
Chen, S. (2024). Mining emotions in academic writing: A subdisciplinary probe into medical research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 74, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.01.002
Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. University of Michigan Press.
Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jaing, F. (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001
de Magalhães, M.B., Cotterall, S., & Mideros, D. (2018). Identity, voice and agency in two EAL doctoral writing contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.001
Deng, L., Cheng, Y., & Gao, X. (2024). Engagement patterns in research article introductions: A cross-disciplinary study. System, 120, Article 103204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103204
Doncheva-Navratilova, O. (2021). Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
Dong, J., Liu, Y., & Lu, X. (2023). A discourse dynamics analysis of academic voice construction: Disciplinary variation, trajectories, and dynamic interaction patterns. System, 119, Article 103181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103181
Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2014). Measuring the voice of disciplinarity in scientific writing: A longitudinal exploration of experienced writers in geology. English for Specific Purposes, 34, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.10.001
Fløttum, K. (2006). Medical research articles in the comparative perspectives of discipline and language. In M. Gotti, & F. Salager-Meyer (Eds.), Advances in medical discourse analysis: Oral and written context (pp. 251-269). Bern.
Fløttum, K. (2010). A linguistic and discursive view on climate change discourse. ASp, 58, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1793
Fogal, G. G. (2020). Investigating variability in L2 development: Extending a complexity theory perspective on L2 writing studies and authorial voice. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz005
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Arnold.
Hanauer, D. I. (2015). Measuring voice in poetry written by second language learners. Written Communication, 32(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314563023
He, F. (2020). Identity construction in academic writing of student writers who use English as an additional language: A Literature Review. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 506-524. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2020-0033
Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice. The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 83-106.
Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795-2809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007
Hyland, K. (2005). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002
Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl
Hyland, K. (2012). Undergraduate understandings: Stance and voice in the final year reports. In K. Hyland & S. C. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp.134–150). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2018). “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2023). Interaction in written texts: A bibliometric study of published research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(4), 903-924. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.40220
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing (vol. 5). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ivanič, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and education, 18(3), 220-245.
Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 3-33.
Kashiha, H. (2024). Stance-taking in peer reviewer and thesis examiner feedback on Iranian scholarly contributions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68, Article 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101364
Khamkhien, A. (2025). The art of referencing: Patterns of citation and authorial stance in academic texts written by Thai students and professional writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 74, Article 101470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101470
Le Ha, P. (2009). Strategic, passionate, but academic: Am I allowed in my writing? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.003
Lee, K., & Ye, Y. (2023). Uncovering the dimensionality of authorial voice in the integrated writing task: A confirmatory factor analysis study. System, 117, Article 103115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103115
Li, A.W. (2024). Bilingual returnee scholars’ identity in academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 64, Article 101112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101112
Li, Y., & Deng, L. (2021). Disciplinarily capable and personally unique: Voicing disciplinary identity in personal statement writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, Article 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100949
Lillis, T. (2009). Bringing writers’ voices to writing research. Talk around texts. In A. Carter, T. Lillis, & S. Parkin (Eds.), Why writing matters. Issues of access and identity in writing research and pedagogy (pp. 169-187). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9
Matsuda, P.K., & Tardy, C.M. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
Mhilli, O. (2023). Authorial voice in writing: A literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8, Article 100550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100550
Mo, Z., & Crosthwaite, P. (2025). Exploring the affordances of generative AI large language models for stance and engagement in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 75, Article 101499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101499
Mu, C. (2024). Citation choices in L2 novices’ and experts’ literature review sections: A functional discourse analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68, Article 101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101361
Mur-Duenas, P., & Sinkuniene, J. (2016). Self-reference in research articles across Europe and Asia: A review of studies. Brno Studies in English, 42(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2016-1-4
Pearson, W.S., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2023). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review. Lingua, 293, Article 103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561
Qi, Q., & Zhao, C.G. (2023). Discoursal scholarly identity in research writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, Article 101052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101052
Ryan, E., & Wilde, G.A. (2024). Two voices, one paper: Using storywork to reassess the impact of academic language on “English Learners” in Alaska. Linguistics and Education, 84, Article 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101344
Shen, Q., & Tao. Y. (2021). Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. Plos One, 16(3), Article e0247981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247981
Stock, I., & Eik-Nes, N.L. (2016). Voice features in academic texts - A review of empirical studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006
Strauss, S., Feiz, P. (2013). Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. Routledge
Sun, Q., Kuzborska, I., & Soden, B. (2022). Learning to construct authorial voice through citations: A longitudinal case study of L2 postgraduate novice writers. System, 106, Article 102765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102765
Sun, Y., Yang, K., & Chen, G. (2024). The research trends of corpus-assisted stance research (2004-2023): a systematic literature review. Current Psychology, 43(48), 37167-37182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07130-x
Tan, X., Xu, W., & Wang, C. (2025). Voice in AI-assisted multimodal texts: What do readers pay attention to? Computers and Composition, 75, Article 102918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102918
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first-person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, Article S23eS39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5
Tardy, C. M. (2012). Current conceptions of voice. In K. Hyland, & C. Sancho-Guinda (eds.). Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp. 34-48). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825
Tardy, C.M., & Matsuda, P.K. (2009). The construction of author voice by editorial board members. Written Communication, 26(1), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308327269
Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D.J., Horseley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., & Akl, E.A. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–73. https://doi.org/107326/M18-0850
Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x
Xie, J. (2016). Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
Yang, W. (2016). Evaluative language and interactive discourse in journal article highlights. English for Specific Purposes, 42, 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.01.001
Yasuda, S. (2022). Natural scientists’ perceptions of authorial voice in scientific writing: The influence of disciplinary expertise on revoicing processes. English for Specific Purposes, 67, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.03.001
Yoon, H.-J. (2017). Textual voice elements and voice strength in EFL argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 32, 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.02.002
Yoon, H.-J., & Tabari, M.A. (2023). Authorial voice in source-based and opinion-based argumentative writing: Patterns of voice across task types and proficiency levels. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 62, Article 101228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101228
Zhang, G. (2023). Authorial stance in citations: Variation by writer expertise and research article part-genres. English for Specific Purposes, 70, 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.002
Zhang, J., Lee, G.I., & Chan, M.Y. (2024). Systematic Literature Review of Crosslinguistic Analysis of Stance Markers in EFL Learners’ Academic Writing in English. World Journal of English Language, 14(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n1p19
Zhang, W., & Cheung, Y.L. (2018). The construction of authorial voice in writing research articles: A corpus-based study from an APPRAISAL theory perspective. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/320261
Zhao, C. G. (2013). Measuring authorial voice strength in L2 argumentative writing: The development and validation of an analytic rubric. Language Testing, 30(2), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456965
Zhao, C.G., & Wu, J. (2022). Perceptions of authorial voice: Why discrepancies exist. Assessing Writing, 53, Article 100632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100632
Copyright (c) 2025 Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Авторы, публикующие статьи в журнале, соглашаются с условиями политики авторских прав.
